- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California votes AGAINST making the human trafficking of a minor a serious felony...
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:28 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:28 pm to AggieHank86
You think voting against this is odd? That’s the best way you can describe this?
Pedo Hank at it again
Pedo Hank at it again
1
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:29 pm to RollTide1987
Can't wait for Newsome to get on the stage with DeSantis next year.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:32 pm to udtiger
quote:
Considering their state is intersected by a major fault line (and the merging of two tectonic plates), you'd think they'd be a little more careful in upsetting the Almighty.
They don’t believe in the Almighty
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:37 pm to DawgCountry
quote:You truly ARE illiterate, aren't you?
You think voting against this is odd? That’s the best way you can describe this?
quote:In smaller words, just for you:
assuming that the legislation was “clean,“ however, this does seem like an odd result.
"Sometimes, bad stuff gets tacked onto good bills. Maybe that happened here. If not, it is odd that this bill was killed in committee."
Then I read the bill. The trafficking is ALREADY a felony. The bill basically sought to add generic "trafficking" to a list of CAPITAL offenses, for purposes of California's recidivism statute. It is not entirely unreasonable for a legislator to think that the State need not treat trafficking the same way that it treats murder.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:37 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s n
it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
For society, its worse
If you understood cause/effect, you wouldn't struggle with this
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:40 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
“trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
Spoken like a true groomer
quote:
It is not entirely unreasonable for a legislator to think that the State need not treat trafficking the same way that it treats murder.
Yep, this groomer is going to groom
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:40 pm to RollTide1987
They are not serious people
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:41 pm to AggieHank86
Groomer
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:43 pm to Bourre
quote:
Spoken like a true groomer
Cmpartmentaized bubble dweller living in gated communities and has never lived in the real world
Thats the recipe for believing the fairy religion too
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
I doubt that. The bill would have added the measure to the three strikes law. Thus the equivalence is not murder, but such things as residential burglary and weapon related offenses
If your analysis is correct then what someone was stating is that “no someone that sells a child for the THIRD time isn’t as bad as that person who happened to use a weapon in a fight but didn’t hurt someone”
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is not entirely unreasonable for a legislator to think that the State need not treat trafficking the same way that it treats murder.
Trafficking children should be treated as murder. Don't you agree?
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:53 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Once again, you put your illiteracy on open display.quote:For society, its worse. If you understood cause/effect, you wouldn't struggle with this
it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
I did not say that I agreed with that sentiment. I said that one of the legislators on that committee could easily have reached that conclusion.
My grandfather once told me "Don't get angry until you are certain that he said what you THINK he said." You should listen to my grandfather, Roger.
You should also try to understand the legislation in question.
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:55 pm to Bourre
quote:Another moral paragon who thinks that forcing a kid to pick tomatoes is as bad as killing the kid.
Bourre
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:56 pm to RollTide1987
There is no hope for California. This is what happens when a state is governed by Democrats.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:58 pm to jrobic4
quote:
Hes more concerned for his peers than victims
Don't forget his donors.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:59 pm to dukkbill
quote:you clearly do not understand recidivism laws. They do not require three instances of conviction of the same felony. They require three instances of conviction of any felony on the list.
If your analysis is correct then what someone was stating is that “no someone that sells a child for the THIRD time isn’t as bad as that person who happened to use a weapon in a fight but didn’t hurt someone”
In this case, assume a 2-time felon who is then convicted of trafficking a kid. This bill would have dictated treatment the same as if that their conviction had been for a capital felony.
Maybe you think that is good policy. Hell, maybe it is good policy. But it is clear that most posters whining about this vote do not understand that this is EVEN the issue. They are utterly convinced that this is a "grooming" issue.
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
forcing a kid to pick tomatoes is as bad as killing the kid.
PedoHank thinks forcing kids to pick tomatoes is the same as being sold into sex slavery. Totes the same to a groomer
All crimes against kids should have the harshest consequences. You are more worried about the perps life, I care about the children’s lives and the pieces they have to pick up after it being destroyed. Children being sold into slavery (either labor or sexual slavery), through child trafficking; should be dealt harshly
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:01 pm to RollTide1987
Whoops there it is the biggest immoral Legis bill since Sodom and the US will be soon judged by the Worlds creator.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:01 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:Depends upon the reason for the trafficking.
Trafficking children should be treated as murder. Don't you agree?
Trafficking them to sell to someone to sacrifice the kid in a satanic ritual? Absolutely.
Trafficking the kid for sexual exploitation? Probably.
Trafficking the kid to pick avocados? No, not at all. Felonly? Yes. Capital offense? You are out of your mind.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was told that this was only promoted as a partisan issue when a particular letter was referenced.
Yes, clearly not partisan:
quote:
No Democrats who serve on that committee were willing to vote "yes" on the bill. The lone "yea" vote came from one of two Republicans currently serving on the committee. The other Republican was absent.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News