- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bunk, yesterday we took out another boat full of "fishermen"
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
So, you concede the drugs are bound for the US. No further questions for the witness.
1
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:15 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Did we need judges vs the Barbary pirates.
It's a close call...and I was going to say that even the people who drafted the war clause didn't seem to have a problem sending the Marines to Tripoli without a declaration of war.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:16 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Well, of course it is. Any country that doesn't exclusively deal oil in US dollars is an enemy of the Deep State.
Maybe I am too cynical. I just think blasting boats so many miles away from our shores shows that this is more to rattle the sword at Venezuela than it is to battle drugs.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Hold on. DoW was invoked just no judges involved like today’s world. 
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:17 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
So, you concede the drugs are bound for the US. No further questions for the witness.
If the drugs were bound for the US, why not follow them and execute/arrest the people closer in the chain to the US?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:18 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Good question but…see current judges.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:21 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Good question but…see current judges
Amen.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
After they've been divvied up to who knows how many final (or even more intermediate) delivery people? Easier to whack them closer to the source. We know at this time and place those drugs are there.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:25 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I feel so much safer. Thank you Donny for ending the drug trade by knocking off some small boats.
Whew
You're right. Doing nothing is much better.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:25 pm to TX Tiger
quote:None of which relates to the OP.
is more to rattle the sword at Venezuela than it is to battle drugs.
Well, of course it is. Any country that doesn't exclusively deal oil in US dollars is an enemy of the Deep State.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
hope you guys support a POS Dem SOS and SecDef arbitrarily deciding we are in a new war on terror and conducting extrajudicial executions whenever and wherever they wish.
I won't because it will almost certainly be retarded and unjust rather than smart and just.
Easy
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:26 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
After they've been divvied up to who knows how many final (or even more intermediate) delivery people? Easier to whack them closer to the source. We know at this time and place those drugs are there.
Fair point.
I notice Hegseth didn't even claim these particular drugs were destined for the US. Does that matter? Is it okay to bomb any drug running boat?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:26 pm to stout
I cannot like this enough. And you’ve never dealt with weaning a family member off fentanyl carried across JoeTato’s wide open border, you can STFU, and GFY
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:29 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I hope you guys support a POS Dem SOS and SecDef arbitrarily deciding we are in a new war on terror and conducting extrajudicial executions whenever and wherever they wish.
Remember when Repubes voiced concerns over Obama’s increasing reliance on drone strikes to fight terrorism?
This post was edited on 10/22/25 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:30 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:So, you're for taking away guns so that no family has to deal with the murder of a loved one. Correct?
I cannot like this enough. And you’ve never dealt with weaning a family member off fentanyl carried across JoeTato’s wide open border, you can STFU, and GFY
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:32 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
None of which relates to the OP.
Genuine question: has it ever been the policy of the US to blow up vessels suspected of drug running in international waters without even attempting interdiction?
The OP is about blowing up a vessel in the "eastern Pacific" without reference to the drugs being bound for the U.S. I am just speculating that this new policy is centered around dominating northern South America rather than about stopping drugs.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:33 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
I cannot like this enough. And you’ve never dealt with weaning a family member off fentanyl carried across JoeTato’s wide open border, you can STFU, and GFY
This is the kind of emotional crap that will get our guns taken away. This is the same exact argument progressives use to go after firearms.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Progressives use the death of drug smugglers to go after legal guns?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:36 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
So, you're for taking away guns so that no family has to deal with the murder of a loved one. Correct?
Exactly. I wonder if that poster is named David Hogg?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 5:38 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Progressives use the death of drug smugglers to go after legal guns?
How in the living hell did you come up with this?
Page 6 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News