- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Kari Lake loses trial to overturn Arizona Governor election - Vows to appeal
Posted on 12/26/22 at 5:27 pm to Wednesday
Posted on 12/26/22 at 5:27 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The further away in time and geography from an Election Day polling place, the greater the chance of frickery. There is no substitute for in person voting. None.
They know, and they love it.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 5:28 pm to David_DJS
quote:
So I'm clear what you're suggesting, please explain the control that's lost.
Anomalies in results that conflict with other polling places, historical results, demographic makeup, etc.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 5:35 pm to moneyg
quote:
Anomalies in results that conflict with other polling places, historical results, demographic makeup, etc.
There's # of votes cast by voters from a particular geography (or precinct or district), but that's not lost by being able to vote wherever you want. I'm not sure what demographic information you're talking about.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 6:30 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There is NOTHING wrong with our message!*** ***except that the majority of the country does not like it.
The vast majority of Americans never get to hear the America First message….you know that, you’re not an idiot. Turn on any Gaslight Media propaganda outlet of your choice and listen for 1 hour, 12 hours, a day, a week…..you’ll never hear one stitch of positive news about America First let alone any stories on what America First stands for or their beliefs. I offer the same challenge in our universities….it would be a rare occurrence to find a university professor espousing true conservative or America First beliefs to impressionable young adults…..it’s all progressive Wokeism.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 6:48 pm to Bass Tiger
That isn’t true nobody cares what the media says anymore they just want hand outs and the federal government to enforce their ideological bs down everybody’s throats
Posted on 12/26/22 at 7:01 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Cheating is now officially ok as long as you label it a “mishap”.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 8:14 pm to Flats
quote:
Being against laws that make illegal activity more difficult makes me think you’re perfectly happy with these laws being broken because it helps your candidates. Dems have a hard time winning without harvesting from the lazy and disinterested, because you have large numbers of them that love your policies.
I have said multiple times that broken laws need to be charged and prosecuted. The issue is you want to stop ballot harvesting not because of potential illegalities but because of what you said above. You don’t want the “lazy and disinterested” voting because they don’t vote the way you want. Unfortunately, their votes count. The GOP should actually try appealing to them rather than demonizing them.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 8:48 pm to LSU2ALA
We need more programs and handouts
Posted on 12/26/22 at 10:03 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
You don’t want the “lazy and disinterested” voting because they don’t vote the way you want.
I don’t want them to vote, period. If they’re not willing to expend the same effort to vote as they do for a buying a lottery ticket I’d just as soon they opt out. It’s telling that you think that will disproportionately impact liberals, but I happen to agree.
quote:
The GOP should actually try appealing to them rather than demonizing them.
Again, this is telling. The ideals I think government should encourage (to the extent they’re involved at all) don’t appeal to the lazy and disinterested. I don’t think those are qualities that should be encouraged, but you obviously disagree.
You can try to spin this however you like, but based on the measures the left opposes you don’t give two shits about election integrity. I’d be perfectly fine with everyone who chooses, left, right, an-caps, whatever, showing up at the polls on a given day, producing an ID to prove they’re not disenfranchising real voters and casting their ballot. Maybe they all vote for Bernie; if so, then at least I know the election was legitimate. You good with that?
Posted on 12/26/22 at 10:13 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
The issue is you want to stop ballot harvesting not because of potential illegalities but because of what you said above.
bullshite. Someone else filling out a ballot and dropping it into a drop box isn’t representative of a “lazy or disinterested” voter.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 10:35 pm to Flats
quote:
I don’t want them to vote, period. If they’re not willing to expend the same effort to vote as they do for a buying a lottery ticket I’d just as soon they opt out. It’s telling that you think that will disproportionately impact liberals, but I happen to agree.
Ballot harvesting is a joke.
Voting by mail is bad enough, but the idea a person can be paid to go out and fish for votes for the guy paying the wages is ridiculous.
Another problem is how the "disinterested voter" is enticed to become interested enough to produce the ballot that's harvested.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 10:57 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Ballot harvesting is a joke.
Of course it is, and I suspect they know that.
Posted on 12/26/22 at 11:06 pm to Flats
I’m not sure they even do that in Russia.
That’s what I’m going to sleep with anyway.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 5:12 am to Wednesday
quote:
There is no substitute for in person voting.
There doesn't need to be, if the goal is to allow people to vote.
Of course, if the goal is to only allow certain people to vote, it's plainly obvious why someone would have a problem with voting by mail.
It's 2022. There's no legitimate reason to limit voting to in person only.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 5:52 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
There's no legitimate reason to limit voting to in person only.
How do you verify that it is the right person who is submitting the ballot?
trust??
let's play poker - I'll shuffle the deck any way I want and deal out your cards to you - no cut - You make your bet and show me your hand - then I'll deal me a hand and decide what the rules of the game are, and if I want to call your bet or not - ok???
Posted on 12/27/22 at 6:56 am to ChineseBandit58
Now, take a deck with 30 blue cards and 22 red cards and deal two hands with EVERYONE watching. You can only win with red hands, and your opponents can only win with blue hands.
There need not be sleight of hand for your opponent to win more hands than you.
There need not be sleight of hand for your opponent to win more hands than you.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:22 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Of course, if the goal is to only allow certain people to vote, it's plainly obvious why someone would have a problem with voting by mail.
Lol, nonstop peddling of this talking point like the Russian Collusion Big Lie
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 7:23 am
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:25 am to DEG
You were just chomping at the bit to race out to vote against Trump in 2020? An eternity ot felt like you had to wait before you were able finally show Trump your disapproval. I bet it was tough, crossing off each day on that damn ole calendar. One of those suburban househusbands.
The ironic part is that Trump wouldn’t want your support anyway. Too sensitive, too flighty.
The ironic part is that Trump wouldn’t want your support anyway. Too sensitive, too flighty.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:29 am to davyjones
quote:Trump is a politician, albeit an unconventional one.
The ironic part is that Trump wouldn’t want your support anyway.
He will gladly accept any vote he is given.
Popular
Back to top



0






