Started By
Message

re: Breaking: Garland is unsealing the search warrant

Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3201 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

quote:...


Interesting
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:50 pm to


That judge in California had a wicked sense of humor.

Hewlett-Packard was involved in some nasty litigation and had a tendency to heavily-redact everything they filed, so the Judge faux-redacted his own Order, with the substance of his ruling stuck in (an unredacted) footnote.

It was pretty damned funny.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 4:08 pm
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8061 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:56 pm to
Don't have a link, but magistrate judge gave DJT until 3pm Friday to oppose the motion to unseal.

Interesting development. The DoJ looks eager to get this stuff into public record.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35373 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Let me know when hilldawg decides to return the 28k in furniture they "stole" from the Whitehouse.

They returned that within 3 weeks of leaving the WH. Trump is about 18 months removed and has been asked nicely for all the stuff for many many months.

Likewise, none of the stuff the Clinton's took with them were considered classified documents.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
9134 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:07 pm to
Sure phaggot, ok.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34010 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:13 pm to
Now we all know why Senate Republicans didn't want Garland anywhere near the Supreme Court
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22242 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:28 pm to
I'm sure info that can even remotely be perceived as damning has nothing to do with it. Not political at all. Not choreographed at all.

You're watching the definition of "Ends justifying the means" unfold before your very eyes.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
22925 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:43 pm to


Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6076 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 5:05 pm to
It is not a warrant.

It is a non-host generated invitation to the FBI.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 5:07 pm to
Imagine thinking that’s an analogous statement.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25410 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 5:21 pm to
Came out an hour late and when his voice wasn’t trembling and crackling in fear it was weapons grade platitudes & word salad. That dude is a giant pussyfart.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 5:22 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19418 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

The warrant will only tell us what we already know.


The FBI didn't need a warrant for what they already had access to. I suspect that they just want to hide Crossfire Hurricane evidence of their own malfeasance and maybe plant bugs. I hope Trump has all of the digital files they were printed from.
Posted by guy4lsu
shreveport
Member since Aug 2004
2867 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

If the receipt list is a bunch of stuff that Trump stole, then the affidavit is less important. Not unsealing the affidavit basically says that the criminal case is ongoing.

Trump still has the right to object to the unsealing of the receipt list and warrant. Let's see what he does.


It’s paper. Your telling us that they needed 30 armed agents to raid an ex presidents home for some boxes of paper?
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Theoretically, another party could intervene to oppose unsealing the information.

Trump?
You know it is not included in their plans for you to make it.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9249 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 7:15 pm to
They found it

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
15036 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

Interesting development. The DoJ looks eager to get this stuff into public record.


I want to know. I guess we all do.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23559 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

I want to know. I guess we all do.

not everyone... it's interesting, b/c this very same info that the DOJ is trying to unseal has been in possession of the Trump Team for over 72 hours now... if they wanted us to know, they would have released it by now to show how much this is to do about nothing... just like if the whole story about the place being absolutely wrecked by the FBI were true, we'd have seen pics of it by now, but we haven't...

all i'm saying is it's going to be very interesting to see what the reasoning is going to be when Team Trump elects to keep it sealed, even though all week every Republican with a decent microphone in their face has clamored for transparency on the reason for the raid... and coming on the heals of pleading the 5th, after saying, for years, that ANYONE pleading the 5th is doing so b/c they are guilty and hiding the truth...
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73335 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

all i'm saying is it's going to be very interesting to see what the reasoning is going to be when Team Trump elects to keep it sealed, even though all week every Republican with a decent microphone in their face has clamored for transparency on the reason for the raid... and coming on the heals of pleading the 5th, after saying, for years, that ANYONE pleading the 5th is doing so b/c they are guilty and hiding the truth...


Saying for YEARS lulz
He said once 8yrs ago
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47701 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 8:00 pm to
Breaking: Garland is a bold faced communist liar.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23559 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

He said once 8yrs ago

not quite...
but don't take my word for it...
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram