Started By
Message

re: Breaking: Garland is unsealing the search warrant

Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:24 pm to
BREAKING
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10359 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:26 pm to
If he does this then it’s bad for trump. Garland wouldn’t do this if he wasn’t damn sure that they got what they wanted and it’s serious af.

Conversely, if trump knew that they didn’t find what they wanted, he would have yelled it from the top of the highest social media platform on the internets.
He’s been quiet.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Garland wouldn’t do this if he wasn’t damn sure that they got what they wanted and it’s serious af.


Lolz
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
24959 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

If the receipt list is a bunch of stuff that Trump stole, then the affidavit is less important.


Given the FBI’s tenuous relationship with legitimate affidavits as of late, and against this President, it’s actually the preeminent issue at hand. Try again.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115517 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Garland wouldn’t do this if he wasn’t damn sure that they got what they wanted and it’s serious af.


have you been paying attention the last decade?

They have gotten to the point where they very openly don't care anymore
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50248 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

If the receipt list is a bunch of stuff that Trump stole,


LOL. Chasing all that underage tail has you groomers really thinking outside the box, I see.

Goodness y'all have totally lost the plot.
Posted by umrebel2009
Member since Feb 2010
7284 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

black coverups


African American cover-up, don't be racist
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17448 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

BREAKING


To bad it wasn’t that liberal POS’s neck? He has 100% weaponized the DoJ and FBI.
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3201 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

He’s been quiet.


So apparently Trump was scheduled to give a deposition regarding (as I understand it..) this whole document thing. Suddenly, the FBI raids his home days before he is supposed to give his deposition.

The reason he is quiet is because the FBI jumped the shark and his lawyers (rightfully) advised him to keep his mouth shut..

Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
4717 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:49 pm to
Let me know when hilldawg decides to return the 28k in furniture they "stole" from the Whitehouse.
Posted by keltonAve
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2022
202 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

He can't unseal it, it's a judge ruling. The judge could say no, though that would be pretty crazy.


You do realize that it was the DOJ that obtained the court order, right?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Let me know when hilldawg decides to return the 28k in furniture they "stole" from the Whitehouse.
This is so stupid.

When the Clintons left the WH, they took a bunch of stuff (like $200k) that they believed to have been personal gifts, and they provided a highly-detailed list of every item. Some watchdog group saw the list and asserted that some of the stuff did not constitute personal gifts, but rather gifts to the American people (the White House). The Clinton's promptly returned ALL of those items, apparently without contesting any of these assertions.
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5830 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Let me know when hilldawg decides to return the 28k in furniture they "stole" from the Whitehouse


Bill declassified that furniture before they left. Before it went to the White House it was in Roswell, NM and now it has good home in Chappaqua.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

He can't unseal it, it's a judge ruling. The judge could say no, though that would be pretty crazy.
quote:

You do realize that it was the DOJ that obtained the court order, right?

Oates is correct.

Though the DoJ requested the sealing initially and has now requested unsealing, the DoJ cannot either "seal" or "unseal" unilaterally. That must be done by the judge.

The judge COULD theoretically sua sponte rule to keep it sealed, but that would be unusual (as Oates said). It is also possible that someone could intervene in the proceeding and attempt to keep it sealed. For instance, Trump MIGHT do this, though I don't know WHY he might want to do so.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101321 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

This is so stupid.

When the Clintons left the WH, they took a bunch of stuff (like $200k) that they believed to have been personal gifts, and they provided a highly-detailed list of every item. Some watchdog group saw the list and asserted that some of the stuff did not constitute personal gifts, but rather gifts to the American people (the White House). The Clinton's promptly returned ALL of those items, apparently without contesting any of these assertions.



Hey, have you been able to find any sort of detailed accounting and inventory for all the documents Obama took from his presidency, for which you were chiding Trump over for daring to try to compare to his situation?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Hey, have you been able to find any sort of detailed accounting and inventory for all the documents Obama took from his presidency, for which you were chiding Trump over for daring to try to compare to his situation?
Transferring possession of unclassified dox to a presidential library is SOP. Is there a list somewhere out there? I am sure there is. Will there be much news coverage of such a non-event? Probably not.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
22051 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

You do realize that it was the DOJ that obtained the court order, right?


Doesn't matter. That power resides solely with the judge that put the seal order in place. I'm sure he'll unseal it but Garland can't just do it himself.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101321 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:05 pm to
How was it determined that all of Obama's documents were "unclassified" versus whatever Trump took?

ETA, Outside of you being "sure" but not quite really knowing, of course. Anything besides that?
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 3:07 pm
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22496 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:09 pm to
And who has seen this unicorn?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Outside of you being "sure" but not quite really knowing, of course. Anything besides that?
I am not particularly interested in a routine non-event.

If you are as interested as would seem to be the case, why don't you do some research and get back to us?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram