- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/30/18 at 6:46 am to FT
BS. You are a dem and the line has been drawn. All in for open borders, socialism and an elite wealthy ruling class. With whites marginalized to second class citizenship and eventually stamped out.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:00 am to FT
The democrats taking the House by a small number of seats is not "wave." The most likely scenario is the Dems take over the House and republicans gain in the Senate.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:09 am to FT
quote:
Blue wave, or not?
Democrats would have to flip 63+ seats in the house to have a blue wave
Why more than 63? Because that is how many house seats Obama lost in 2010
That was a red wave.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:12 am to FT
quote:
Tell that to the Tea Party. They won the House is 2010 but couldn’t win the Senate.
That was absolutely seen as a red wave.
the movement that basically split the GOP into 2 was a "red wave"?
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:18 am to FT
quote:
That was absolutely seen as a red wave.
It depends on the magnitude of the change.
If it is merely a historical shift of 20+ votes, that is not a wave - that is just the normal way things work. People don't celebrate high tide every day.
IF the DEMs gain 60+ seats - then that is a wave comparable to 2010
IF the DEM gain is less than 20, it is a huge defeat for the DEM expectations.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:05 am to FT
You know why it's a blue wave if they flip it, regardless of the number of seats? Because, Speaker Pelosi, Low IQ Maxine chairman finance committee, impeachment proceedings, etc.
That's a win for them.
That's a win for them.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:13 am to FT
I’m really digging all of the posturing in this thread. 
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:19 am to Decatur
quote:You're referring to continued use of the term "Blue Wave" by lefties?
I’m really digging all of the posturing in this thread.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:20 am to Decatur
There’s is no definition of a wave election so it’s all semantics so who cares?
I vote to say it’s no wave unless you overperform the historical averages. I don’t think you need to take both chambers however.
I vote to say it’s no wave unless you overperform the historical averages. I don’t think you need to take both chambers however.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:22 am to FT
quote:
Tell that to the Tea Party. They won the House is 2010 but couldn’t win the Senate.
That was absolutely seen as a red wave.
The Republicans gained 6 Senate seats in 2010. The Dems will net 0 or less in 2018.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:24 am to DallasTiger11
quote:Of course there is. It is an election in which a single parties gains significantly exceed norms.
There’s is no definition of a wave election so it’s all semantics so who cares?
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:30 am to FT
haven't you made threads like this before and you welch?
you are fully trolling nowadays because not even you would still support HRC. do you want HRC to run for POTUS again?
you are fully trolling nowadays because not even you would still support HRC. do you want HRC to run for POTUS again?
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 8:31 am
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:33 am to FT
I’ll take that bet but you don’t have anything I want except maybe your dignity.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:41 am to MrLSU
he has no dignity
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:45 am to FT
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:54 am to FightnBobLafollette
quote:
FightnBobLafollette
You are a very delicate snowflake
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:59 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
It depends on the magnitude of the change. If it is merely a historical shift of 20+ votes, that is not a wave - that is just the normal way things work. People don't celebrate high tide every day. IF the DEMs gain 60+ seats - then that is a wave comparable to 2010 IF the DEM gain is less than 20, it is a huge defeat for the DEM expectations.
In the last 21 midterm elections only twice has the party that controlled the White House held the House during Midterms.
The average number of seats lost to the Presidents party is 30.
The Democrats may indeed win the House but it will be by at most 10 seats.
There is no Blue Wave.
Of course if democrats actually win the house by even 1 seat they will consider it a MANDATE!!! and a complete and utter repudiation of Trump and his policies.
They will ignore the shellacking their savior Obama took in 2010 when their party lost a historic 63 seats.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 9:00 am
Posted on 10/30/18 at 9:49 am to FT
I don’t see how taking over the house means there is a blue wave when Republicans still have the senate the White House . It sounds like your already downto hoping to be able to win the house .
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:04 pm to Kraut Dawg
quote:
Blue Wave 2020? No, your wave was to be this year. That's been the sentiment & the talking point since 2016.
Incorrect. A lot of very traditional Republican areas this year. 2020 is going to be an absolute Slaughter.
quote:
If Republicans can hold on to the House, your Blue Wave will have turned into a Blue Waffle.
Thats a cringe worthy sentence, bud.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News