
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any takers for a discussion about “Marxian economics”?
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:28 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:28 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
NC_Tigah
I have a lot to share with you about school privatization! Will probably have to start a different thread another time but I thought of you when I was reading about “disimagination” and grit in the context of charter schools.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:30 am to AmishSamurai
quote:
Notice how the OP selective picks responses that correlate to their worldview and constantly ignores the facts being posted in this thread
I generally ignore posters whose posts primarily consist of petty grievances and/or personal attacks. That’s not why I’m here.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:33 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I generally ignore posters whose posts primarily consist of petty grievances and/or personal attacks
Then explain your MIC comment(s) in light of the Federal Budget numbers I posted ...
Or should we just skip to the part where you kick over the pieces, shite on the board and declare victory?
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 11:35 am
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:36 am to AmishSamurai
Your numbers don’t dispute that private contractors have found a way to secure significant public dollars through the “cost-saving” measure of privatizing government services.
You’re trying to argue that the military doesn’t account for most of our spending but that was not my point.
You’re trying to argue that the military doesn’t account for most of our spending but that was not my point.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:41 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Your numbers don’t dispute that private contractors have found a way to secure significant public dollars through the “cost-saving” measure of privatizing government services.
You started the thread arguing for Marxism ...
Just like a pigeon you kick over my King with this straw man ... after arguing that the "largest parts" of our budget aren't solved by private markets ... in order to even start/make this argument, you have to actually know what are the "largest parts" of our budget ... Military spending is a pittance.
Be sure to wipe after the shite ...
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 11:47 am
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:44 am to lurking
quote:zing!
You chose to wear the girdle, fig.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:45 am to 4cubbies
Back when you were conservative
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:46 am to 4cubbies
I tried to start a conversation about this very topic while waiting in line to vote, but the lady at the vote sign in table said, "Sir, please enter the booth and cast your vote, and please stop talking."
People don't care to engage in any kind of high-level intellectual conversation these days.
People don't care to engage in any kind of high-level intellectual conversation these days.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:47 am to 4cubbies
quote:
generally ignore posters whose posts primarily consist of petty grievances and/or personal attacks. That’s not why I’m here.
Or posts that destroy your argument.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:49 am to Champagne
quote:
I tried to start a conversation about this very topic while waiting in line to vote, but the lady at the vote sign in table said, "Sir, please enter the booth and cast your vote, and please stop talking."
People don't care to engage in any kind of high-level intellectual conversation these days.
Lucky for us we have the PT forum.
Extremely high IQ individuals on this forum, and one in particular will remind you how high their IQ is.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:50 am to beerJeep
quote:
Or posts that destroy your argument.
One day people will understand she’s not interested in legitimate discussion and will ignore her ridiculous threads. They all play out exactly the same way.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:52 am to 4cubbies
quote:
“Marxian economics”
Translation: How to starve millions of people
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:52 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Extremely high IQ individuals on this forum, and one in particular will remind you how high their IQ is.
I was a PhD candidate in Economics at MIT in the 90s ...
I haven't shared my IQ yet ...
/s
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:53 am to AmishSamurai
quote:
I was a PhD candidate in Economics at MIT in the 90s
I taught you at MIT
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:54 am to ShoeBang
quote:
I taught you at MIT
I left in first year.
The Marxist professors drove me back into the tech start-up world and haven't looked back ...
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:55 am to AmishSamurai
quote:
I left in first year. The Marxist professors drove me back into the tech start-up world and haven't looked back ...
Thank you for listening to me
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:56 am to AmishSamurai
quote:
Notice how the OP selective picks responses that correlate to their worldview and constantly ignores the facts being posted in this thread ... Like playing chess with a pigeon.
Like every thread she starts. Divert, ignore, red herring. Every time.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 11:57 am to ShoeBang
quote:
Thank you for listening to me
Posted on 11/3/26 at 12:03 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Your numbers don’t dispute that private contractors have found a way to secure significant public dollars through the “cost-saving” measure of privatizing government services.
You’re trying to argue that the military doesn’t account for most of our spending but that was not my point.
Speaking of federal government contractors.
I watched a Nick Shirley vid this morning where he was talking with a GSA supervisor. This GSA supervisor showed Shirley the receipts on some of the billions of dollars the Illegitimate Biden Regime gave to NGOs to process and relocate an estimated 300k-400k unaccompanied children from 2021 through 2024. A lot of the NGOs were in and around the Tucson AZ area, Nck decided to pay them a visit and see where the millions of taxpayer dollars went along with all the children.
Guess what? Not one NGO wanted to talk about it.

Popular
Back to top


0








