- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/19/18 at 9:50 pm to Wolfhound45
I know u agree with me but just pretend u didn’t see
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:17 pm to AmericaOverParties
quote:
If I can prove it can, should that be illegal?
Why should it be illegal? Did you not see that US v. Miller protects arms suitable as "ordinary military equipment"? Are you that uneducated or just stupid?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:19 pm to Clames
Dems quickly forget that the worst school shooting in the U.S was done with a standard 9mm and a .22.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 10:31 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
They ignore that fact, it's been posted several times. Bless their willfully ignorant little hearts... 
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:32 pm to weagle99
The AR-15 has a shorter barrel than a standard hunting type rifle making it a little less accurate for longer shots, but easier to swing in a tight spot and spray shots. It is designed for combat, not sniping. The AR is also designed to handle a high capacity clip to fire off many more rounds than a standard rifle.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:34 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Dems quickly forget that the worst school shooting in the U.S was done with a standard 9mm and a .22.
shite! Just think how many more people that SOB could’ve killed w/an AR!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 11:58 pm to Jbird
quote:
Charles Whitman University of Texas 1966 14 killed 32 wounded, all with a three round magazine.
Never underestimate the value of the high ground in the field of battle.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:31 am to MichiganTiger
quote:
The AR-15 has a shorter barrel than a standard hunting type rifle making it a little less accurate for longer shots, but easier to swing in a tight spot and spray shots.
I can buy and install as long a barrel as I want, the US military as well as foreign militaries use purpose-built AR rifles in DMR and Sniper roles. Accuracy is easily achieved. Also, in nearly 20 years in the Army I have yet to see anything about spraying shots. That is a bullshite talking point you are mindlessly parroting.
quote:
The AR is also designed to handle a high capacity clip to fire off many more rounds than a standard rifle.
First off, magazine. Second, any rifle that accepts a detachable box magazine can take higher capacity versions.
See, bolt-action "standard" rifle with detachable box magazine.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 1:24 am
Posted on 2/20/18 at 12:37 am to MichiganTiger
quote:
but easier to swing in a tight spot and spray shots
Spray shots? With a semi-automatic rifle?
Even if you could, why would you?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:15 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
exact
Not true...
No 3 rd burst or auto
Posted on 2/20/18 at 1:18 am to Clames
quote:
. Also, in nearly 20 years in the Army I have yet to see anything about spraying shots. That is a bullshite talking point you are mindlessly parroting.
Yep, even the worst untrained shooters hit the 3x4 target paper at 25m, maybe not the 500m target, but they are on the sheet.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 6:06 am to MichiganTiger
quote:
The AR-15 has a shorter barrel than a standard hunting type rifle making it a little less accurate for longer shots, but easier to swing in a tight spot and spray shots. It is designed for combat, not sniping. The AR is also designed to handle a high capacity clip to fire off many more rounds than a standard rifle.
You don't know what you're talking about. Please, be quiet and listen.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:14 am to MichiganTiger
quote:
The AR-15 has a shorter barrel than a standard hunting type rifle making it a little less accurate for longer shots, but easier to swing in a tight spot and spray shots.
Stop talking about guns, baw, particularly repeating talking points you heard from the media or politicians.
quote:
It is designed for combat, not sniping.
So, sniping isn't "combat"?
quote:
The AR is also designed to handle a high capacity clip to fire off many more rounds than a standard rifle.
How is the AR designed or constructed ANY differently than ANY other semiautomatic rifle ever, ever, that gives it this magical capability?
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 7:42 am to AmericaOverParties
What do you think the founders purpose of the 2nd Amendment was? 
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:09 am to MichiganTiger
quote:
MichiganTiger
You have already outed yourself as an uninformed poster.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:57 am to Clames
The crawfishing here is astounding lol.
"Tell me how it's different" ok...1..2..3... " no it's functionally the same. Ok so it's the same. "No, no no, it does 1...2...3..." So it's different? "No, no, it's the exact same thing as my ranch rifle."
And around we go. Banning a style of weapon will not prevent all mass shootings. But every single statistic and study ever conducted shows it reduces mass causality situations. I'm sorry but that is flat out a fact. You can bring up inner city deaths all you want but that not the issue. The issue is will a weapon that you say is functionally no different than any other semi-auto reduce mass casualties? That answer is a resounding yes. You're brainwashed or just plain ignorant to argue the contrary.
"Tell me how it's different" ok...1..2..3... " no it's functionally the same. Ok so it's the same. "No, no no, it does 1...2...3..." So it's different? "No, no, it's the exact same thing as my ranch rifle."
And around we go. Banning a style of weapon will not prevent all mass shootings. But every single statistic and study ever conducted shows it reduces mass causality situations. I'm sorry but that is flat out a fact. You can bring up inner city deaths all you want but that not the issue. The issue is will a weapon that you say is functionally no different than any other semi-auto reduce mass casualties? That answer is a resounding yes. You're brainwashed or just plain ignorant to argue the contrary.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 9:00 am
Posted on 2/20/18 at 8:59 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
But every single statistic ever conducted shows it reduces mass causality situations. I'm sorry but that is flat out a fact
Where are these studies?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:03 am to civiltiger07
Same place as his head.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 9:05 am to ShreveportHog94
How many AR’s do you think have been involved in mass shootings?
Page 17 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News