Started By
Message

re: And .... like clockwork, here comes the dirt on Charlie

Posted on 9/17/25 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86294 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Literally every quote is accurate. The only people outraged by this are the same ones outraged by everything. This doesn't move the needle one bit. fricking losers.



Well they are all missing context.
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5302 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 12:59 pm to
I already said I liked the guy. No reason to try to convince me with all these quotes.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
13780 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

they are objectively problematic.

How so? Please elaborate. What's problematic about them? Refute any of them.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79265 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:00 pm to
They are trying so hard to justify the murder that each and every one of them are complicit to…all of them have blood on their hands…

CK went into their “sanctuaries” had not only destroyed them with facts, opened up 1000s of young people’s eyes and giving them a voice but also held up a mirror forcing them to look at what they truly are…vile human beings…
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20645 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Remember the other day when you said you were conservative?

LOL

The next time he says something conservative will be the first.

Conservatives don't use words like "problematic" in the first place unless they're repeating something from a leftist.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86294 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

If JD is the front runner for the ‘28 ticket, he has a chance to be that figure to move beyond hate that seems to consume our politics and try to bring everyone back towards the middle a little bit.



Your ignorance knows no bounds.

JD and Kirk were good friends. He ain’t going to the middle.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21871 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

I honestly didn’t even see any of those that would objectively problematic other than the oft-cited one about gun deaths.

“Prove me wrong” being cited is hilarious.

True, but you and I don't read like Leftist's do. My point is even a Leftist should be able to listen to Charlie Kirk and go, "what the frick, I don't agree with him very much but he's hardly the hater I've been told he is."
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5302 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

am a conservative.


I find that highly unlikely.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125556 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:10 pm to
Sure.

But if you buy the premise, you buy the bit.

If you believe he’s a Christofascist, racist, homophobe, then you see these quotes and think “These are probably some of his tamer quotes. He is probably praising Hitler somewhere in the hours of tape.”
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
9482 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:11 pm to
I wonder why a British tabloid has decided to weigh-in on this topic?

I did see some clips of Kirk debating at Oxford and Cambridge. It was sort of comical to watch the students all thunderously applaud for every leftist trop uttered.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
27917 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Which one am I supposed to be offended at


I was reading these and my brain was going Agree, Agree, Agree, Agree, Agree


Where's the bad part
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125556 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:12 pm to
Because the Marxists at the Guardian are advocating for the Revolution. Same as every other day ending in Y.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8055 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:


I am a conservative. That doesn’t change the objective divisive nature of these statements.

i dont think you know what the word objective means.

quote:

He was a beloved figure and voice to those on the far right who agreed with him.

please list out his "far right" positions, and be specific
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
10327 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:20 pm to
I don’t understand what he said that was wrong
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25193 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Literally every quote is accurate. The only people outraged by this are the same ones outraged by everything.


And they're all quotes taken out of context from a larger set of comments. The one sentence quote they cherry picked about a black pilot was part of a larger conversation about the dangers of DEI hiring practices where companies would select a lesser qualified candidate because they checked off the right boxes for race, gender, etc and how it puts the public in danger when their lives are in the hands of someone who got hired because of their race rather than their qualifications.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63272 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:26 pm to
Not a false statement in the bunch

I'll think all about how racist it is the next time I'm watching a video of some black guy pissing on a white kid in a movie theater.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67567 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:28 pm to

Somebody hasn’t read the actual words of the Framers when discussing and drafting the Constitution, especially when it comes to religion.

Also, he seemed awfully concerned about black Americans randomly attacking white people for fun in the city and especially about a black pilot flying a plane.
You can’t “prove wrong” thiose types of opinion. They’re simply personal beliefs and prejudices…
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8366 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Ok are you refuting any of these?

If actually said, they are objectively problematic.


only to pussies and swishes
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25193 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

I am a conservative. That doesn’t change the objective divisive nature of these statements.


The statements are divisive because they're being taken out of context. The lefties parroting those statements are cherry picking one sentence out of a much larger conversation and context. When taken out of context, the statements seem really bad. But if you actually listen to the whole context, its not controversial sounding anymore.

Snopes on the black pilot statement

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297390 posts
Posted on 9/17/25 at 1:30 pm to
How do we move forward with people who think words = violence, and disagreement means youre a racist or homophobe?


There is no path forward with them.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram