Alex Jones Blaming The US For Spain Invasion Of Moroccan's

Alex needs clicks, and he sees the easiest way to do that is to turn against Trump.

Notice that it all started when he realized that Elon was not defending Alex to help him out, but rather to protect rights on X?

Alex is bitter, and legal bills and judgments are killing him financially.

Waiting for Spain to be labeled as nazis for deporting people.

quote:

---

Alex needs clicks, and he sees the easiest way to do that is to turn against Trump.

---

Do you disagree with his take on what is happening in Spain?

I haven’t looked into the Spanish situation myself, but it seems plausible that what he’s suggesting could be true based on the legislation he cites.

I flat out don’t understand our foreign policy strategy currently relative to what I thought he wanted in the general election.

I'm convinced that it was 100% a coordinated invasion by the Moroccan government. I'm sure our intelligence agencies at minimum knew it was happening, but I doubt Trump personally signed off on it.

I hope the Muslims continue to invade Spain and give the Socialists there exactly what they voted for.

Why not both?

If you look at jones family tree...you can see clearly that he is controlled opposition.

quote:

---

Is there anything that isn’t Trump’s fault? It’s so tiresome.



Anything that isn't his fault is the Jews.


And then if that fails just blame Putin.

---

Nailed it.

quote:

---

Do you disagree with his take on what is happening in Spain?

I haven’t looked into the Spanish situation myself, but it seems plausible that what he’s suggesting could be true based on the legislation he cites.

---

I'm wondering why Jones didn't highlight the very next sentence in the committee notes that says the committee encourages Spain and Morocco to reach a diplomatic agreement.

It kind of goes against the claim that the US sponsored the invasion, doesn't it?

This is also after just accepting that the highlighted sentence acknowledging that the disputed Spanish-owned cities are in Moroccan territory somehow means that the US is sponsoring, or even just in agreement with, an invasion.

There is literally nothing in the provided text to suggest the US was behind the invasion, so I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that it was "plausible" that the US provided material support for it.

You don't find it weird that this bill provides money for the invasion yet neither Jones nor Massie included the text that would supposedly support their claim?

You think an unwritten "wink and a nod" is justifiable reason to blame the US for the actions of muslims?

No proof, just "trust me, man. The words aren't there, but I know what it really means. You'll see the invisible meaning too if you hate the same people I do." Sadly, that's all it takes for many conservatives these days.

quote:

---

I flat out don’t understand our foreign policy strategy currently relative to what I thought he wanted in the general election.

---

I don't remember Trump ever mentioning the Spain/Morocco territorial dispute during his campaign. You are trying to tie Trump to this invasion simply because the House allocated funds to Morocco.

How exactly does an invasion by muslims into a Spanish city in Morocco and the House voting on a spending bill mean that Trump is backtracking on his foreign policies from the campaign?

I need actual words and actions from Trump that support a shift in narrative concerning this specific incident. Generalities and inferences don't apply. How does this muslim invasion into Spanish cities explicitly contradict Trump's foreign policy objectives mentioned in the campaign?

Did he promise to protect the Spanish homeland? Did he promise an end to mass migration in foreign countries?

It's a real stretch to tie this to Trump.

quote:

---

Alex Jones

---

Fatigue.