- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:31 pm to TBoy
Has anyone actually sued to get this in the Supreme Court? Let's just settle the Constitutionality of it once and for all.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:34 pm to TBoy
That's about the same number of people who believe Sandy Hook was staged.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:34 pm to TBoy
Their letter conveniently forgets to cite that the Bush administration's deferred action after Katrina was for students legally in the US previous.
Everything they cite is not similar in this case because their examples all involved people who were in the country legally before hand.
This is nothing more than liberal law professors stretching the law.
Everything they cite is not similar in this case because their examples all involved people who were in the country legally before hand.
This is nothing more than liberal law professors stretching the law.
This post was edited on 9/5/17 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:35 pm to Hightide12
quote:
Their only claim is prosecutorial discretion. IOW their case is being made on the basis of a President refusing to enforce the law.
quote:
Which would be an argument if he didn't grant 'privileges' to these illegals.
WINNER WINNER CHICKEN DINNER!!!
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:36 pm to Andychapman13
Exactly!!!! My professors could not handle the real world practice!
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:40 pm to ShortyRob
9th Circuit in March - "YOU CAN'T DO THAT!"
Now: "YOU CAN DO THAT!"
Now: "YOU CAN DO THAT!"
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:45 pm to TBoy
Does it even address the privileges granted?
(You know the part that is actually unconstitutional?)
(You know the part that is actually unconstitutional?)
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:46 pm to HubbaBubba
The Trump bootlickers say anything. It's amusing, actually. Keep going. I'd like to read more legal opinions from y'all.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:49 pm to TBoy
quote:
I'd like to read more legal opinions from y'all.
Like I said, go read up on Turley And Dershowitz then get back to us.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:49 pm to TBoy
quote:I notice you dutifully ignore how pathetically insignificant 105 is.
The Trump bootlickers say anything. It's amusing, actually. Keep going. I'd like to read more legal opinions from y'all.
You thought that number sounded compelling.
Turns out, it's basically nobody.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:50 pm to TBoy
quote:
DACA is constitutional
So is doing away with it interestingly.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:52 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:quote:
I'd like to read more legal opinions from y'all.
Like I said, go read up on Turley And Dershowitz then get back to us.
He probably wouldn't understand what he was reading until he got it parsed from DU.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:55 pm to TBoy
quote:
Does it even address the privileges granted? (You know the part that is actually unconstitutional?)
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:56 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:I've never said legally, that Trump had or didn't have the authority to limit immigration. I've only questioned whether politically if it was the right call. As it seems to be a rather unpopular move. As evidenced by the amount of pearl clutching done by Democrats and even members of the Republican party.
In February Trump was Hitler and has no authority over the borders. Now the President can do whatever he wants with immigration.
You people.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 4:58 pm to TBoy
What to actual lawyers think?
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:01 pm to TBoy
Well then, I guess undoing DACA will be constitutional as well
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:09 pm to TBoy
Literally making up laws out of whole cloth is "prosecutorial discretion"?
So, under the "analysis" of these far left whackjobs, a President can instruct his cabinet departments to not enforce any law he doesn't like and that is considered "prosecutorial discretion"?
So, if Trump can't get his Tax legislation through, he can just sign an Executive Order directing the IRS to not make corporations pay more than 15% and telling the IRS to not enforce nor require anyone to file an AMT return or an Estate tax return, and that would be justified under the Executive Branch's "prosecutorial discretion"?
Then why would the President need to go to Congress and NEGOTIATE to get any law passed. He can just issue EOs out of his a$$ and say F*CK YOU to any Congress who doesn't do exactly as he instructs them to do.
You have to be one seriously f*cked-in-the-head HACK to even begin to think that these "professors" aren't complete f*cking left-wing NUTJOBS.
So, under the "analysis" of these far left whackjobs, a President can instruct his cabinet departments to not enforce any law he doesn't like and that is considered "prosecutorial discretion"?
So, if Trump can't get his Tax legislation through, he can just sign an Executive Order directing the IRS to not make corporations pay more than 15% and telling the IRS to not enforce nor require anyone to file an AMT return or an Estate tax return, and that would be justified under the Executive Branch's "prosecutorial discretion"?
Then why would the President need to go to Congress and NEGOTIATE to get any law passed. He can just issue EOs out of his a$$ and say F*CK YOU to any Congress who doesn't do exactly as he instructs them to do.
You have to be one seriously f*cked-in-the-head HACK to even begin to think that these "professors" aren't complete f*cking left-wing NUTJOBS.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:18 pm to TBoy
quote:
The Trump bootlickers say anything. It's amusing, actually. Keep going. I'd like to read more legal opinions from y'all.
Prosecutorial discretion is right there in the first paragraph of the letter you posted. Don't blame us that you don't comprehend what that means.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:20 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
So you think 105 law professors know more about the law than Trump?
The only difference between 1 sheep and 105 sheep is that 105 sheep make more noise and spread more shite.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News