- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Couple (actually 105) Law Professors weigh in on whether DACA is constitutional
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:23 pm to gthog61
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:23 pm to gthog61
quote:
So they really want the president to have the power to wave his arm and make shite up?
Don't think they thought that through
Conservatives used to call what your inferring with the above as "judicial activism." Basing judicial opinions on what you want to be true personally, instead of what existing law says... I guess we call it Trumpism now. What Trump wants the law to be, is what his followers find a way to convince themselves it is.
2
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:25 pm to TBoy
105 lawyers will probably send the White House a bill.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:31 pm to TBoy
quote:The pertinent question for them should then be, is unilateral elimination of DACA by the Executive Branch Constitutional.
And their clear analysis is a good read. DACA is Constitutional
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:44 pm to TBoy
So the left found 100 lawyers to side with DACA?
:shockfacegif:
:shockfacegif:
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:48 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
What Trump wants the law to be, is what his followers find a way to convince themselves it is.
What are you referring to??
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:48 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
Basing judicial opinions on what you want to be true personally, instead of what existing law says... I guess we call it Trumpism now. What Trump wants the law to be, is what his followers find a way to convince themselves it i
the law as written by congress is clear. If anything, you have your analysis completely backwards. The EO authorizing privileges is contrary to the written law. 
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News