Started By
Message

re: 538 analysis: 'Herd immunity won't save us'

Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:24 pm to
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4459 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Good to see Nate Fake Gold is also a scientist.....


in addition to being incorrect.....again.




Nate has actually been pretty reasonable during all of this. He's consistently criticized media for irresponsible fear mongering and not reporting on good news.

The problem is basically everyone at 538 other than Nate is a stereotypical super soft, soy boy millennial type who can't maintain any objectivity in their writing. This specific article and model were some of these other 538 writers.
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4459 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:26 pm to
Nate has also been beating the drum for a while now that both NYC and NOLA likely developed some level of herd immunity in their populations, which is why their decline has been so much sharper than everywhere else.

That seems to run contradictory to this article.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10196 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

14,959 out of 1.8 million is a death rate of 0.008%. These are the best real world numbers we have.


I think it's 0.8% (almost 1%).
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Ooh, 3 women get together and decide to write an article.



During commercials while binge watching The Bachelor and The Masked Singer.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19440 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

I think it's 0.8% (almost 1%).


To keep it simplest and in perspective, 1% of 1,800,000 is 180,000 which is over 12 times the number of NYC deaths as of yesterday.

0.8% would come in at about 9.6 times the actual number of deaths.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10196 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:01 pm to
1% of 1,800,000 is 18,000 not 180,000
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19440 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

1% of 1,800,000 is 18,000 not 180,000


You're right. Brain fart on my side.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123855 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

So let’s go back to that 70 percent herd immunity threshold
Varies by virus, but 40% probably gets us there, FWIW
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29665 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I gotta be honest: I'm ok with a mass kill-off if the alternative is hiding in our houses until a vaccine is developed
yeah, we can't keep spending 4 or 6 trillion for every 80K or 100K deaths anyways

rip the band aid off already

95% with underlying conditions and 80% over 65

average age is 79

leas than 1% mortality rate, probably closer to half a percent

I like my chances and I crave liberty more than I fear death
Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3262 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

So let’s go back to that 70 percent herd immunity threshold. If the fatality rate is around 0.5 percent and 70 percent of Americans have to get sick before their immunity starts protecting others, that means more than 1.1 million people would die.


“ Both papers indicate, among other things, that the infection rate required to reach herd immunity is much lower than the simple first-order model indicates ”

LINK

The papers:

Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought

LINK



Individual variation in susceptibility or exposure to SARS-CoV-2 lowers the herd immunity threshold

LINK
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14819 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:34 pm to
Edited for math correction which someone already had pointed out.
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 4:39 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46010 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

tinized.

Nursing home deaths are driving the death rate. Less than one half of one percent of the US population, but are making up nearly 50% or more of all deaths.


Remove the NY and NJ nursing home deaths and the US mortality rate from Covid19 is probably well below 1%
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

NYC has about 8.5 million people so 21% is about 1.8 million who have had the virus. 14,959 out of 1.8 million is a death rate of 0.008%. These are the best real world numbers we have.


You didn’t move the decimal two places

Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76656 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15410 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:09 pm to
According to this guy, Hillary Clinton should be president right now.

There's more to life than being alive y'all.

I'm not giving up hugs, parties, restaurants, or handshakes. Especially based on anything that nerd who fails to see the forest for the trees may say.

I'll wear a mask to be polite for a while, but I kind of resent the intrusion because this seems to be the result of FOS freakout, and I'm not really sure it will do any good. So my fuse is probably pretty short on that one. Plus, I obsessively washed my hands 400 times a day & Cloroxed my countertops if I walked past them anyway.
I also, because I am vain and weird and love any home remedy for beauty - enjoyed a good bleach bath for exfoliation and to keep my skin looking nice - even before the Covid. You Baws who deal with rosascea, excema, or skin allergies - check it out. Trust me. I'm a skin products amateur, vain, well kept woman of a certain age professional in this department.

I'm pretty much done with this shite. I've been researchign new hairstyles on Pinterest all day and I'm going full cut and color on Tuesday. You'll recognize me because I'm going to be the lunatic strutting around the grocery store in a cocktail dress, a full hair blow out and false eyelashes at 2:30 in the afternoon on a Wednesday. Because it's my day. And thank God hair salons are back in action.

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Individual variation in susceptibility or exposure to SARS-CoV-2 lowers the herd immunity threshold


Yep. Also consider what happens to the IFR once all of the nursing homes have been infected, which they probably have in NYC. Nowhere to go but down.
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
10329 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

What we do know so far

Do we really? What I “suspect” is a huge helping of liberal msm bullshite associated with this whole “disease.”
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98864 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

If 1.1 million people die, and 1.05 million of those were going to die within a year anyway due to pre-existing conditions,


That’s a lot of savings in Medicare and Social Security.

Thanks COVID
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8141 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:23 pm to
The article assumes that a path to herd immunity post-infection is just mass infection of everyone; however, the IFR is not the same for every age group. Nearly 70% of the US population is under the age of 60, and the estimated IFR for those under 60 is significantly less than the 0.5% figure used in their analysis.
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
16189 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:34 pm to












first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram