Started By
Message

Wetlands question

Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:21 am
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1396 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:21 am
For a parcel of family-owned property a judicial determination by the US Army Corps of Engineering was done a few years ago.
A portion of this property is 38% wetland.

Is there a legal way to reduce this percentage?
Posted by arbe25
Member since Sep 2017
395 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:28 am to
You in swla? That’s not terrible. Not great either. I’ve delineated 1000’s of acres in swla and many of the soil types have 40-60%. Pimple mounded topography makes it difficult to delineate without just giving an overall percentage. You could hire a different consultant although they may come up with something higher.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8841 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Is there a legal way to reduce this percentage?


Yes, haul alot of dirt and plant crops then call them back.

They determine wetlands by the vegetation.
Posted by Duckhammer_77
TD Platinum member
Member since Nov 2016
2894 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:04 am to
If the corps has already made a determination, then it's in the books and you can get fed charges if you destroy any of it. The legal way to get rid of it is buy credits from a wetlands bank and then receive permission from the Corp to alter/destroy them. The market rate is expensive and O&G companies always buy them out and keep the rates high. What you can do is create a wetland on another part of the property, let it sit 8-10 yrs, have it delineated by the corps, and sell the credits to yourself.
Posted by KemoSabe65
70605
Member since Mar 2018
5466 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:24 am to
Why couldn’t he get that property into the bank and sell credits like Dore,Miami,vermilion,etc do?
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12930 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:54 am to
quote:

The market rate is expensive and O&G companies always buy them out and keep the rates high.

Not at all true in Louisiana.
quote:

What you can do is create a wetland on another part of the property, let it sit 8-10 yrs, have it delineated by the corps, and sell the credits to yourself.

And not typically accepted in Louisiana, except under certain circumstances.

OP, from experience dealing with the Corps, if you have a determination, there's no changing it...unless it's a preliminary determination. JDs are only good for so long (5 years) regardless of status (approved or preliminary).

If you seek an Approved Jurisdictional Determination, I believe there are some appeal rights that come with that. I never had a client go through on an appeal, mostly because we never went beyond a prelim. There is more involved for an approved, and none of our clients cared about having one--most just wanted to know what they needed to do to develop the land.

Fun fact: SWLA (and one consultant in particular) is the only place I've ever seen percents used in the state. I suspect that land has some type of Savannah or prairie plant community on it, or, at the very least, the "pimple mound" geography once common to the region.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 7:57 am
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1396 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:36 am to
Yes, the parcel is located south of the Maplewood section of Sulphur. Providence Engineering of Baton Rouge did the evaluation. It was described as pimple mound topography.

Some of the relatives wanted to cut a few trees to allow for additional sunlight to dry some damp areas and move some topsoil around.

Plans are to list it for sale as soon as a few title corrections can be taken care of. It is presently zoned as light industrial.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
16284 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:40 am to
The JD should include a map showing wet, etc. Since you're on the radar I wouldn't jack with it (at least in the wet areas)just list/sell it if that's what the end goal is.
Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
17356 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Yes, haul alot of dirt and plant crops then call them back.


I would highly advise against doing this.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Yes, haul alot of dirt and plant crops then call them back.

They determine wetlands by the vegetation.


If I could only get the Corps to go along with this approach!!!!

P.S.- OP, do not do this.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 8:53 am
Posted by arbe25
Member since Sep 2017
395 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:54 am to
quote:

relatives wanted to cut a few trees


Perfectly legal.


quote:

move some topsoil around.


Illegal. You can cut trees down with a chainsaw, but you can't disturb the soil, so removing the treetops with heavy equipment may be a problem. Absolutely no mechanized land clearing.

I wouldn't worry about the wetlands issue. It will probably sell without a problem and the developer will need to get the permit. If wetlands really caused a problem, then we wouldn't have all this development going on right now.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
84147 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:54 am to
quote:

What you can do is create a wetland on another part of the property, let it sit 8-10 yrs, have it delineated by the corps, and sell the credits to yourself.


This is a very complicated process. There's an environmental lawyer in BR that specializes in this. I have had to learn about it due to damages caused by over spray.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12930 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Plans are to list it for sale as soon as a few title corrections can be taken care of. It is presently zoned as light industrial.

Wouldn't do a thing with it then. You have a JD. Hand that to the would-be purchaser, and if they want to deal with it, let them.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
28903 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 3:03 pm to
I did wetlands work for a long time, a long time ago.

quote:

Wouldn't do a thing with it then. You have a JD. Hand that to the would-be purchaser, and if they want to deal with it, let them.


This is the correct answer. While the percentage of wetlands on the property is "high", at with a determination in hand, the buyer will have an idea of what's there going in. They won't have to fork out the thousands of $$$ that it would take to conduct a determination.
Posted by mthorn2
Planet Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
1415 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 3:48 pm to
Its on the COE radar since they determined jurisdiction. Do NOT drive any equipment within the wetland area. You may cut trees, by hand, but don't clear cut anything. Honestly 38% wetland isn't a deal killer most industrial developers won't even blind at having to mitigate those wetlands.

Don't attempt to "solve" the problem ...its been determined. Its 38% wetlands. Move on. You can't claim to not have known they are wetlands because you have a JD. The COE will hit you with a first offense $20,000 fine. Not worth it.
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19459 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:16 pm to
Just be glad they didn’t also find an arrowhead out there then you’d be really fricked
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
136982 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Yes, haul alot of dirt and plant crops then call them back.

They determine wetlands by the vegetation.

Might want to wait until the JD expires before doing that. Even then it's probably not smart
Posted by CharleyLake
Member since Oct 2006
1396 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:31 pm to
Certainly a persuasive argument for my out-of-state owners in division. Thanks to all that know about these things for your helpful comments.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12930 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

You can cut trees down with a chainsaw, but you can't disturb the soil, so removing the treetops with heavy equipment may be a problem. Absolutely no mechanized land clearing.

That's not necessarily true. For example, if the land is in timber production, you can cut it all down and replant it with no issues. As long as it's in timber production, there's no problem.

Obviously, the OP isn't talking about a silviculture operation, so that doesn't apply here and you are correct in that regard. Just thought I would point out that there are exceptions to the "no mechanized clearing" issue.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
18894 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 8:22 am to
Can manipulating a wet land get you in a shite ton of trouble? That falls under multiple federal jurisdictions I would think. I would be careful
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram