- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not happy with this Walther...
Posted on 5/10/16 at 11:13 pm to Propagandalf
Posted on 5/10/16 at 11:13 pm to Propagandalf
quote:
It just sounds like you're relying on an external safety to relieve you of some of the safe gun handling reaponsibilities.
Not really. That trigger is way sensitive after that first shot. I have run 1 1/2 boxes of ammo through it and it worked just fine. I just never have begun to feel comfortable with it. That second shot and thereafter requires much less trigger travel than the DA first shot and I understand why. It's quite sensitive and requires much less effort to fire than the DA first shot. If any of my wheel guns fired that easily, I'd get rid of them. And yes, I know that wheel guns have a heavier trigger weight than semi-autos and I fully understand why they are both designed that way. If anything, I am way safer in handling the PPX than anything I own. As I said before, this is the first semi-auto I've ever owned. I thought they all had external safeties. I now know better. My mistake. I've learned a lot from yall's input. Much more has changed with semi-autos than just frame composition in the last 50 years and I've learned that the hard way. This ain't the first mistake I ever made. I once bought a VW Beetle.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 6:52 am to BFIV
quote:
BFIV
The majority of the shooters on this board that are "arguing" with you are simply trying to at least show you logically that your fears are unfounded.
If you haven't done a lot of handgun shooting, there are lots of myths that have spread like wildfire, either from Hollywood or from the good ole days. So we are simply talking you through the process logically as to show you that clearly. Arguing and disagreeing with someone is one of the best ways to force you to think for yourself. That's all.
I, along with others, think you should pursue some training, and not just because you prefer a safety. Those who are less familiar with handguns can greatly benefit from a firearms training class. You learn how to handle yourself through higher levels of stress and how to shoot from many unconventional positions. It is true defensive handgun training that I think anyone can benefit from.
Good luck in your searches.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 7:19 am to BFIV
After doing a ton of research I came to the conclusion that the safest possible gun for me was a hammer fired DAO with no external safeties whatsoever. No trigger, grip, or slide safeties that would prevent me firing the gun if I needed to, but the existence of a hammer that would aid me in not firing the pistol if I didn't want to. The first, and last, thing I touch when holstering, or grabbing in general, the gun is the hammer with my thumb, hold that down and it absolutely will not fire. It feels really natural. It's also very natural to move your thumb when squeezing the trigger, since you end up wrapping it around the grip for stability.
The trigger pull is quite long, and it stages as well. I literally don't think it possible to 'hit' the trigger and make it fire, even if you threw it on on a spike right in the trigger guard.
The trigger pull is quite long, and it stages as well. I literally don't think it possible to 'hit' the trigger and make it fire, even if you threw it on on a spike right in the trigger guard.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 7:31 am to bapple
I've always been an advocate for training, but if he's uncomfortable with it, he's never gonna use it. I mean, would you CC a desert eagle?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 9:14 am to Scoob
quote:You apparently didn't pay close attention to Hickok45. Go back and listen at the 10:00 mark, and listen again at the 15:50 mark that you referenced.
Dawg- I just watched Hickok45's video, and it is neither DAO, nor striker fired. It's a SA hammer-fired gun. He points this out- you don't get a second strike on a dud, you can see the hammer cock when you rack the slide.
Hickok said it isn't a "pure" DA trigger. ATF says it is a DAO -- just like Glocks and M&P's are classified by ATF as DAO (even though they differ from a "pure" DAO that allows a 2nd strike capability).
Second strike capability doesn't define DAO pistols -- even though some misguided souls would like to think so.
Hickok45 didn't say that that this is a single action pistol -- you said that. Pulling this trigger (just like with a Glock) completes the cocking of the hammer (striker in a Glock), and then releases the hammer/striker. You can see this in the video -- pulling the trigger cocks the hammer.
Glocks, M&P's, the PPX and other modern DAO pistols partially cock the hammer/striker when you rack the slide, and it happens again when a round is actually fired. ATF has deemed that since the hammer/striker is only partially cocked, and since pulling the trigger completes the cocking and releases the hammer/striker, it's a DAO pistol.
Sorry if this sounds confusing. And to some extent it may be a matter of semantics. The overarching concept is that this pistol's trigger works no differently from those found in the most popular, best selling handguns on the market (Glocks and M&P's). If people like the OP are scared of a modern trigger, they need to (a) quit trying to convince people that these triggers are unsafe, (b) accept their own shortcomings relative to training, and (c) go buy a gun that they like.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 9:42 am to Scoob
quote:Thank you. It's amazing how many of the gun folks here do not understand the difference. I would think dawg would get it. It's truly disappointing.
Dawg- I just watched Hickok45's video, and it is neither DAO, nor striker fired. It's a SA hammer-fired gun. He points this out- you don't get a second strike on a dud, you can see the hammer cock when you rack the slide.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 11:09 am to Scoob
quote:
Steer him to something more in his comfort zone; there are plenty of guns that fit his wants. We don't all have to have the same pistol, we just have to support each other's desire and right to own one if he so chooses.
My comment was directed only to the concept of carrying a loaded firearm without a holster, which, in my opinion, is inexcusable.
That the guy wants an external safety is fine.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 11:12 am to BFIV
quote:
In order as you listed, my preferences are:
1. glove box and CC, external safety
2. right handed
3. DA/SA is preferred
4. Metal or polymer frame is fine
5. I have big hands. I want one that fits big hands. I don't want anything with a grip that does not accomodate all four fingers.
6. Does not have to be 16 rounds. After 50 years, anything over 6 rounds is a plus.
P30?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 12:48 pm to bapple
quote:
It is true defensive handgun training that I think anyone can benefit from.
I agree. If a qualified instructor in this area ever offers one of these classes, I'd love to enroll. I always wanted to take one of Jeff Cooper's classes, but California is and was a long way from here.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:00 pm to AlxTgr
quote:I recall your posting this here a year or three ago. I'm sure you an Scoob are sincere in wanting to understand the differences between the traditional Single Action (SA) pistol, the traditional double action (DA) pistol, the hammer-fired Double Action Only (DAO) pistols and the striker-fired DAO pistols.(None of which is defined by a "second strike capability.")
Thank you. It's amazing how many of the gun folks here do not understand the difference. I would think dawg would get it. It's truly disappointing.
Here's a link to a site that will explain the differences between SA, traditional DA, and DAO pistols. Beginners Guide
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:18 pm to dawg23
I understand it completely. Thanks.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:23 pm to dawg23
quote:
understand the differences between the traditional Single Action (SA) pistol, the traditional double action (DA) pistol, the hammer-fired Double Action Only (DAO) pistols and the striker-fired DAO pistols.(None of which is defined by a "second strike capability.")
We're not too far apart on this issue, Dawg, but with a traditional DA pistol (my experience is overwhelmingly with examples of this type - blowback designs, Classic Sig and Beretta M9/92F models) - you do have a "second strike" capability, in that you can hit the primer again without any other manual of arms, simply repeating the trigger pull.
That's how I read the "second strike" comment. Feel free to disabuse me of that notion. Personally, my immediate action is to rack the slide and get a fresh round, but I can understand some folks may pull the trigger again.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:42 pm to Ace Midnight
Nothing to disabuse -- we're on the same page.
I'm just saying that while traditional DA pistols usually (virtually always) have a 2nd strike capability, the absence of a second strike capability doesn't "automatically" (no pun intended) mean the pistol is classified as SA. (Which is what I understood Scoob to sorta be saying earlier).
I'm just saying that while traditional DA pistols usually (virtually always) have a 2nd strike capability, the absence of a second strike capability doesn't "automatically" (no pun intended) mean the pistol is classified as SA. (Which is what I understood Scoob to sorta be saying earlier).
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:49 pm to dawg23
quote:
the absence of a second strike capability doesn't "automatically" (no pun intended) mean the pistol is classified as SA.
Got it. Agree.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 2:16 pm to BFIV
quote:Actually Gunsite is in Arizona. But, unfortunately, Col. Cooper passed away a few years ago. The academy is still lthere, and is still a top-tier school.
I always wanted to take one of Jeff Cooper's classes, but California is and was a long way from here.
But you don't need to travel that far. This guy teaches quite a few classes in Virginia each year. He is highly qualified, and is highly respected in the gun training world.
Greg Ellifritz
Greg's "Assumptions & Biases"
Posted on 5/11/16 at 2:38 pm to dawg23
Dawg - you (or Bap) recommend any rifle/carbine classes in CENLA?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 3:15 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Dawg - you (or Bap) recommend any rifle/carbine classes in CENLA?
I took Intro, Tac Carbine 1 & 2 at VATA in Slidel and it was awesome. I also took Carbine 1 & 2 at Advantage Group near Hammond. Both were excellent but I'm partial to VATA.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 5:26 pm to dawg23
quote:Yeah, I'm following ya. And yeah, I didn't watch all of that video from start to finish, I skimmed to spots where he was breaking it down (that's usu where he discusses the action).
Nothing to disabuse -- we're on the same page.
I'm just saying that while traditional DA pistols usually (virtually always) have a 2nd strike capability, the absence of a second strike capability doesn't "automatically" (no pun intended) mean the pistol is classified as SA. (Which is what I understood Scoob to sorta be saying earlier).
I was going by what I did see of it-
gun has a hammer.
You rack the slide, hammer is cocked (or pre-cocked as he said).
In my limited viewing, and in my understanding, I took that to mean "fully cocked"; like thumbing back the hammer of say, a 1911 (or any hammer-fired DA/SA, going to SA mode).
So you're saying the gun is partially cocked, but requires additional pulling of the trigger to complete the cocking, prior to firing... if I understand it right.
If so, my bad. As these styles of pistols don't interest me, and I was getting ready to go to bed for the night (had to work), I just did a quick search.
2 things did jump out at me (outside of the fact that Hickok was very accurate with it).
Sounds like the gun has a good, nice, light trigger. Just my own opinion, I'm not fond of a pistol in what I would consider SAO with a light trigger, and no external safety or ability to decock and switch to DA (longer pull). Closest thing I could think of with that is a Tokarev, but even they have the half-cock option. now, I'm not a cop, or otherwise carrying all the time and partially expecting that I may need to draw. I can't carry at work legally, and for home defense, I prefer a little secondary safety.
Other thing that jumped out at me was how big that gun looked. I'm not saying get a mouse gun, but jeez, it looked bigger than a GI 1911 in his hands. Not as long maybe, but taller.
One other thing- there was a mention of the gun being used for truck and CC. Without knowing Virginia's laws, I'd think taking a class is mandatory if you're going to conceal carry.
I guess I was able to interpret BFIV's complaints a little more; I remember my dad was also old school. There was 3 types of pistols in his book: revolvers, 1911's, and "goddam pieces of junk". He was ex-military and an engineer, but there was no getting past his personal preferences. I recall discussing a possible purchase in the early 80's and couldn't sell him on a Hi Power
And by that, he acknowledged it was well designed and should function fine, but it was still not desired by him. (Oh yeah, he was also ok with Savages).
To be fair, he did steer me towards the Tokarev, although he didn't want one himself. Said the design was strong and simple, and plenty accurate (and it was), so I figured out the various complaints were simply a version of "I know what I like, and that's what I will get".
Posted on 5/11/16 at 6:03 pm to Ace Midnight
ETA: SORRY - just noticed that your question pertained to rifle/carbine classes. My response (below) pertains to handgun classes. Disregard.
While I don't claim to be an expert on this topic, I have trained with quite a few "top tier" instructors ---- Massad Ayoob, Clint Smith, Tom Givens, Andy Stanford, John Farnam, Jeff Gonzales, James Yeager (before he went off the reservation), and Jerry Miculek to name just a few.
I always recommend Tom Givens (www.rangemaster.com) as a "first" (initial) class. Tom comes to BR about once a year, but you can usually find a class within a few hours driving time (Beaumont, TX, Bastrop, TX & Franklin, TN come to mind as places he teaches at periodically) if you don't want to wait until next year for a BR class.
The reason I think it's important to go to the "right" first class is that in almost any class there will be a few things you should ignore (In some classes there will be a lot of stuff you should ignore). When Gomez was around we often discussed this -- and agreed on this concept.
By "stuff to ignore," I'm referring to things that are at variance with "mainstream doctrine." For example, if 19/20 instructors are recommending "A" as a tactic or technique, and you're in a class where you're being told to never do "A," there's probably something wrong.
Two classes where I don't think you'll ever be taught anything that's stupid, or outside mainstream doctrine, would be Clint Smith at Thunder Ranch & Tom Givens. Gunsite would probably be another, but I haven't trained there, so I don't know this from personal experience.
After you have taken a few classes, you'll have a pretty good feel for "mainstream doctrine" -- but in your first class, you may not.
I don't usually recommend Thunder Ranch as a first class, only because few people want to travel to Oregon, toting 1500 rounds of lead-free ammo, and pay the "high" tuition that Clint charges. Don't get me wrong -- he's worth every cent he charges. But he charges more than most other instructors because he can fill classes months (sometimes a year) in advance even at pretty high rates. The man is that good. (Clint is teaching a defensive handgun class next February in Texas, but that class is already full).
Tom Givens is equally good. And his fees are more in line with what others charge for a class (usually ~ $425-450 for a two day class). LINK
PLUS -- If you ever have to defend yourself in court, pointing to Tom as "the guy who taught me that I should do what I did in that situation" means you'll be pointing to one of the gurus of the gun training world. (And if you're a former student, he'll show up as an expert witness to assist you and your attorney with your legal defense). I don't know of any local instructors who have that standing/reputation in the training world.
While I don't claim to be an expert on this topic, I have trained with quite a few "top tier" instructors ---- Massad Ayoob, Clint Smith, Tom Givens, Andy Stanford, John Farnam, Jeff Gonzales, James Yeager (before he went off the reservation), and Jerry Miculek to name just a few.
I always recommend Tom Givens (www.rangemaster.com) as a "first" (initial) class. Tom comes to BR about once a year, but you can usually find a class within a few hours driving time (Beaumont, TX, Bastrop, TX & Franklin, TN come to mind as places he teaches at periodically) if you don't want to wait until next year for a BR class.
The reason I think it's important to go to the "right" first class is that in almost any class there will be a few things you should ignore (In some classes there will be a lot of stuff you should ignore). When Gomez was around we often discussed this -- and agreed on this concept.
By "stuff to ignore," I'm referring to things that are at variance with "mainstream doctrine." For example, if 19/20 instructors are recommending "A" as a tactic or technique, and you're in a class where you're being told to never do "A," there's probably something wrong.
Two classes where I don't think you'll ever be taught anything that's stupid, or outside mainstream doctrine, would be Clint Smith at Thunder Ranch & Tom Givens. Gunsite would probably be another, but I haven't trained there, so I don't know this from personal experience.
After you have taken a few classes, you'll have a pretty good feel for "mainstream doctrine" -- but in your first class, you may not.
I don't usually recommend Thunder Ranch as a first class, only because few people want to travel to Oregon, toting 1500 rounds of lead-free ammo, and pay the "high" tuition that Clint charges. Don't get me wrong -- he's worth every cent he charges. But he charges more than most other instructors because he can fill classes months (sometimes a year) in advance even at pretty high rates. The man is that good. (Clint is teaching a defensive handgun class next February in Texas, but that class is already full).
Tom Givens is equally good. And his fees are more in line with what others charge for a class (usually ~ $425-450 for a two day class). LINK
PLUS -- If you ever have to defend yourself in court, pointing to Tom as "the guy who taught me that I should do what I did in that situation" means you'll be pointing to one of the gurus of the gun training world. (And if you're a former student, he'll show up as an expert witness to assist you and your attorney with your legal defense). I don't know of any local instructors who have that standing/reputation in the training world.
This post was edited on 5/11/16 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 5/11/16 at 7:28 pm to dawg23
Been a long time since I subscribed to Guns & Ammo. I really enjoyed Colonel Cooper's articles and I was aware he had passed away several years ago. He had a brusque attitute which "put off" some people, but I liked his style. He would "tell it like it is.". Matter of fact, every issue, I always flipped to his article and read it first. I had forgotten his school was in Arizona. The magazine was published in California, if I remember correctly. The one thing I have always remembered and kept in mind was Colonel Cooper's advice on situational awareness. That advice has always stayed with me.
Popular
Back to top


2






