Started By
Message

re: Yesterday i learned that Chernobyl is now a bustling forest and wildlife haven.

Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:11 pm to
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47788 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

One of my coworkers is from Belarus. She was a teenager when it happened and remembers it all very well
I am not positive but think that Belarus is only 5-10 miles from the Chernobyl border.
This post was edited on 6/27/20 at 5:23 pm
Posted by jennyjones
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Apr 2006
10007 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

50 thousand people use to live here


.. now it’s a ghost town


Our so called leaders prostituted us to the west
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Great photo


The Cyrillic writing on the bottom of the sign says, "Epstein Didn't Kill Himself."
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15341 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:46 pm to
Did anybody see the 60min piece on it years ago?

It showed the glowing red hot graphite core shot from a chopper flying over.
I bought a bargain table book at Waldenbooks on the Chernobyl disaster. It told about a guy that lived near the plant that got a nuclear tan from being outside his house. He didn’t even know it had happened.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31644 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

There's tours. I couldn't imagine being on one with Geiger counters constantly making noise.

So let me give you your radiation lesson for today.

You likely won’t carry around a Geiger counter. You’ll wear a dosimeter. They are small and look like a pager and will give you a reading of your total dose received and your instantaneous dose rate. Dose in America is measured in Roentgen Equivalent In Man (REM). 1 REM = 1000 miliREM

Most areas surrounding the plant are now down to less than 50 mrem/hr. NRC allows you 2000 mrem/year. Sure there are hotspots, but you would plan your trip based upon readings and you’d factor your stay times accordingly. Certain things you wouldn’t want to get close to or loiter around. Move along. And certain areas you just wouldn’t go. Remember they operated the other reactors at the site for years after the accident.

Contamination is what you should really be worried about. Soils, dirt, dust all can have high levels of radioactive contamination that you can pick up on a boot, glove, clothing, etc. These can be very bad as they can spread radioactivity to places you don’t want it. The hazmat suits you see people wearing in the movies are to protect against contamination, not radiation. You’re getting the dose no matter what you’re wearing.
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


You think Napoleon invaded Russia for pot?
You think Ukraine is Russia.
Posted by farad
Member since Dec 2013
12754 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:10 pm to
Posted by jimlsu1
Ellicott City, Md
Member since Oct 2008
1647 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:39 pm to
Lol. Why do you KNOW this? BTW, you are wrong.
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Faulkner County
Member since Jun 2009
15778 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

oh please, go Crimea river!!

You win the internets today.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
15168 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:50 pm to
When no people, nature flourishes.
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:51 pm to
It's where Putin got his superpowers. He spent his summers studying geopolitical philosophy in Chernobyl
Posted by FightingTigers138
In your thoughts
Member since Dec 2016
6009 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

The Cyrillic writing on the bottom of the sign says, "Epstein Didn't Kill Himself."


Make a meme of this with the photo and it will be very popular.
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19326 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 6:52 pm to
Saw a report a few years back that Chernobyl isn't really seeing a higher occurrence of animal mutations. That happened in the immediate aftermath, but appeared to return to normal rates within a few years.

What scientists suggested, and I don't know how soon this would happen, was that mutations may begin to be expressed more often as the radiation accumulates through generations of offspring. Don't know if that's happening now since that report came out, however.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Humans are more harmful to nature than a nuclear meltdown.
quote:

Is that the message, or is the message that nature is more resilient than we thought?

Why not both? Lack of human activity is a huge part of the reason for the prevalence of wildlife in that area.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42797 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Humans are more harmful to nature than a nuclear meltdown.


Are humans not responsible for nuclear meltdowns?
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Saw a report a few years back that Chernobyl isn't really seeing a higher occurrence of animal mutations. That happened in the immediate aftermath, but appeared to return to normal rates within a few years.

What scientists suggested, and I don't know how soon this would happen, was that mutations may begin to be expressed more often as the radiation accumulates through generations of offspring. Don't know if that's happening now since that report came out, however.

I can imagine an experiment where animals were exposed to various levels of radiation and then studied over generations. Logically you would think that:
- At extremely high levels of exposure, the animals would die before reproducing.
- At moderate exposure levels, the animals reproduce but can’t sustain a population, either due to sterility or mutations in offspring. The number of generations before extinction varies depending on exposure.
- At low exposure levels, the animals thrive for generations, eventually becoming immune through natural selection.

The interesting thing about Chernobyl is that it’s not a closed system. So you’ve had animals entering and leaving the exclusion zone, being exposed to various amounts of radiation, for many years. I don’t think anyone really knows what the long term impacts of that will look like.
Posted by Warheel
Member since Aug 2011
2306 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Mmmmm radioactive moose meat


First you make a roux,,,
Posted by sand mountainDvalues
Member since Oct 2018
8718 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 8:38 pm to
Life finds a way
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49928 posts
Posted on 6/28/20 at 2:34 am to
Parts of it will still melt your face but animals can just avoid those areas
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30775 posts
Posted on 6/28/20 at 7:27 am to
yeah, but you noticed no night pictures of the animals, the glow they emulate at night would of messed up the shots.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram