Started By
Message

Would you take a lie detector test

Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:39 pm
Posted by muttenstein
Member since Oct 2012
3194 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:39 pm
If you had a loved one who was missing or deceased in order to try and exclude you as a suspect?

Innocent or guilty, I would personally avoid this at all costs. Science is not settled. Too much to lose, IMO.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
2905 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

If you had a loved one who was missing or deceased in order to try and exclude you as a suspect?

Innocent or guilty, I would personally avoid this at all costs. Science is not settled. Too much to lose, IMO.




Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45362 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:40 pm to
I got nothing to hide.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
21898 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:40 pm to
lawyers advise not to
Posted by TigerReb7
Oxford
Member since Sep 2020
655 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:43 pm to
Absolutely not
Posted by muttenstein
Member since Oct 2012
3194 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:43 pm to
Do you understand the question?
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
4366 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:44 pm to
Probably some innocent guy on death row would advise against it.
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
24007 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:46 pm to
Absolutely not. I'd fail even if I were 100% innocent due to my nervous nature.
Posted by Lou
Modesto, CA
Member since Aug 2005
8917 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:47 pm to
Would you take a breathalyzer test if it was optional ?
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
24169 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:47 pm to

I might be wrong, but I seem to remember that a prereq for accuracy from a polygraph is that the subject isn’t emotional, as in distraught or angry. How can I guarantee that I’m not upset about a missing loved one?
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
2601 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Science is not settled


Actually it is

They're bullshite.

Which is why they are excluded from courts.
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
30577 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:50 pm to




Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15582 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:54 pm to
“Remember, Jerry, it’s not a lie if you believe it”
Posted by Barrister
Member since Jul 2012
5330 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 6:55 pm to
How would you know if I told you the truth?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37648 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:01 pm to
Your goal would be to convince the police if you are taking the lie detector test. In which case I don't know if you can do that successfully.

There are objective things that you can demonstrate like where you were. If you want to demonstrate innocence give that information to your lawyer.

I voluntarily gave a DNA sample once when a person with a similar name was allegedly in the presence of a person who was murdered later that night. In retrospect I regret the amount of overcompliance FWIW the murderer in that case turned out to be a policeman who was romantically involved with the victim. The process gave me more sympathy to the innocent people around the person who died. It makes you feel guilty just going through the interview with police and submitting to their requests
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 7:04 pm
Posted by jasonbr1975
Lafayette, LA
Member since Sep 2024
2384 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:03 pm to
It depends on what the question was and if I would be lying or telling the truth to answer it.
Seriously, I would take it in a heartbeat. Won't bother me.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
33180 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:06 pm to
Lie detectors are just this side of voodoo. The science itself is shaky at best, but on top of that, the results are heavily influenced by the individual performing the test. Innocent or guilty, it’s not worth doing, not dissimilar to Standard Field Sobriety.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 7:07 pm
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
24007 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:06 pm to
quote:


It depends on what the question was and if I would be lying or telling the truth to answer it.
Seriously, I would take it in a heartbeat. Won't bother me.


Do you honestly trust the cops that are trying to secure evidence to even tell you the truth on if you passed or not? You're usually not asked to even take one unless you are the suspect in the crime.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75735 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:13 pm to
They aren't admissible in court for a reason.

ETA: And the machine doesn't "detect lies", the person running it is supposed to. You're wholly at the mercy of that person's training and perceived expertise, or lack thereof.
This post was edited on 5/19/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37389 posts
Posted on 5/19/26 at 7:29 pm to
No, and if I “needed” to get excluded as a suspect I would lawyer up immediately and not say a word.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram