- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:07 pm to Oilfieldbiology
You brought up the 97%. However it’s most likely in the 80-90 range
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:08 pm to udtiger
The real solution is to plant more weed. Weed cures cancer and it cleans the air. It has been shown to also inhibit plaque growth on the brain which causes Alzheimer's.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:08 pm to agregime1
Great man
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:08 pm to agregime1
No problem with someone giving their own money to a cause they choose.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:09 pm to crewdepoo
quote:
You brought up the 97%. However it’s most likely in the 80-90 range
1.6% unless you are omitting those scientists who abstained. Then that really isn't a consensus, is it?
This post was edited on 2/17/20 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:13 pm to BugAC
They surveyed climate experts. Maybe this is why your confused. Scientists and climate experts might not be bunched together:
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:15 pm to crewdepoo
leased 70 widebody aircraft to overnight your wife's rubber dog shite order to your house, then uses your money to fund "climate change" 
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:17 pm to BugAC
This is from a 2013 bray and von storch survey of the perceptions of climate scientists on the subject. 7 being very much convinced and 1 being not convinced. The top 3 equal 80%.
The question was on their belief that the recent or future cc is due to human activity.
This post was edited on 2/17/20 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:18 pm to crewdepoo
quote:
You brought up the 97%. However it’s most likely in the 80-90 range
Right. It's not even a debate. The real debate here is how much we can change the climate, ranging from not much at all to a lot.
This post was edited on 2/17/20 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:18 pm to agregime1
So Amazon will stop doing business with China??? Or is this all bullshite and he doesn't actually want to solve anything just pander.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:18 pm to agregime1
Some corrupt UN organization is licking their lips right now 
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:20 pm to agregime1
The ex wife is hotter than the silicone new girl
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:22 pm to crewdepoo
1,Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+% : 64
2,Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimize: 922
3,Implicitly endorses AGW without minimizing it: 2910
4,No Position: 7970
5,Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW: 54
6,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify: 15
7,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50%: 9
2,Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimize: 922
3,Implicitly endorses AGW without minimizing it: 2910
4,No Position: 7970
5,Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW: 54
6,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify: 15
7,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50%: 9
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:23 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
no I don’t. Humans are irrelevant to a planet
Hmmmm…..what's ironic is that humans absolutely, without any doubt, have the power to render life extinct. Yet, accelerating thermal trends is ridiculous.
ok
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:24 pm to geauxtigers456
quote:
People still deny climate change?
I don’t deny the climate is changing, I’m just not arrogant enough to believe that humans have any control over it.
It’s cyclic. Science, Baw.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:26 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
I do wish him and other billionaires would focus a ton of their efforts on two environment things:
- Water cleanup in Asia (India and China), trying to pull trash out of those rivers that is going into the ocean
- Re-forestation. Planting millions and millions more trees would be great for our planet.
If they focus on those two things, they won't ruffle political feathers and would do a bunch of good for the world.
I would agree with this.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:27 pm to tenderfoot tigah
quote:
As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.
Genesis 8:22
Oh the irony...
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:27 pm to agregime1
quote:
announced he'd start the Bezos Earth Fund
does not equal
quote:
giving $10 billion to fight climate change
He just started a foundation which he controls. He's shifted money from one account to another and will take tax deductions etc.
Good for him. He was pressured by his lib employees and he's confused them with bullshite.
Posted on 2/17/20 at 2:28 pm to BugAC
Are you just pulling numbers and words out of your arse
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News