Favorite team:Ohio State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:OSU Football, Cincinnati Football and Baskeball, and Video Games
Occupation:Electrical Engineer
Number of Posts:15753
Registered on:3/8/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

which sec team do you coach, baw?


So he cant make this point about the SEC coaches without being one?

Shut the whole board down! How can we possible post and talk about sports on the MSB without participating in said level of sport.
Dumb question that no google search can answer easily for me.

Do you have to have a "Real ID" to vote or can you vote with a standard state issued ID?
quote:

So Indiana beating Bama by 35 doesn't matter because Bama has 3 more guys invited to the combine?


:lol:

Also, good thing Texas A&M won it all with their 13 combine invites!
quote:

Yeah you make the claim

Then say yeah I would love to see what I claimed.

fricking never go full powermullah.


No, I said I wonder what the pork in the bill was and got told why it doesn't matter. You need to learn to read good.
quote:

Link to the pork pedo?


Like I said in my OP, I would love to see the pork in this bill. If none then the dems who voted against this are pedophile protectors.


I know you like calling anyone anyone who isnt MAGA pedophiles but actually prove something for once.
quote:

Pedos are vile.

You can disagree all that you like, but they are vile.


Who disagrees that all pedos are vile? Not me. Bondi seems to though. :dunno:
quote:

Why would spend my time watching congressional theatrics? My time is more important than watching that circus.


Im sure you love them when the dems are under scrutiny. Please dont pretend otherwise.

quote:

Do you have an opinion on Colorado dems not giving life sentences to child sex traffickers? Dems in Virginia are also trying to do the same thing. It’s a simple question


See my OP. To add to that, I am sure like everyone else they are for life sentences for child traffickers, assuming that was the only thing in the bill, which is unlikely. Dont play dumb, you know how the partisan politics work on BOTH sides.
quote:

It could have been stand alone and your ilk would have still voted the same way.

They are vile.


So your admitting its not standalone and are still projecting.

Per my other response just now, watch the Bondi hearings and try again to call anyone not MAGA vile.
quote:

It’s a shame you leftist can’t criticize members of your own party for letting child sex traffickers get away with a slap on the wrist


Apparently you didn't watch the Bondi hearings :lol:
quote:

This is just a terrible answer to the damn question. How long will it take people to understand that, yes, the full disclosure of this shite can not only crash the markets, but topple our entire government? It's been said in plain frickin English.

This Epstein stuff has more to do with global finance than it does sex trafficking. The sex trafficking stuff is just the shite that is used to distract from the fact that the players involved are global banking cartel members. Perversion is just the tool of control.



quote:

Guaranteed she has a higher IQ than you


She certainly has an IQ higher than most of us, but that high of an IQ cannot make up for and explain away the shite show this has been.
quote:

Whine about ad hominems and keep not answering.


I am IMPLYING that you IMPLIED the same "both sides do it" argument.

Pedal faster bro.

quote:

I watched the entire hearing today. She was lighting them ALL up. She has shite prepared for every single Democrat that tried to go after her. Don't listen to these people who are trying to paint it as anything other than her kicking arse. She was restricted within their "rules", but what she did is she asked for time from GOP members to go back and address what the DNC arse clowns asked her but wouldn't let her answer.

She called each and every one of them out as clowns and multiple Democrats ended up storming out of the hearing because of it.

She clowned them all.


This is literally the exact opposite of what happened. If she was in control she would have had actual answers. Instead she changed the subject quickly and used her oppo research to completely go off on tangent trying to obfuscate, and often times would resort to cheap insults. These were not trick questions and she couldn't even answer most of the basic ones.

I get it...this is like asking either party who won in a debate, but I just dont know how you watched this and didn't come away wondering WTF the AG and her cronies have been doing.

Edit: Let me add that while there were attempts to implicate Trump, the majority of the hearing was criticizing the redaction and release of the files and subsequent lack of action.
quote:

I’ve made no such argument. Dumb or dumber.


You have, you just aren't intelligent enough to know what the word "imply" means.
quote:

Joe had 4 years. YOU haven't answered my ONE question about why he didn't release anything.


You CLEARLY are lost because I am not who you adressed that question to. With that said you still made the argument that "both sides do it" is not a reasonable response despite making the SAME argument.



quote:

quote:

That’s the excuse from Democrats every single time. “Both sides do it… ”.reactions.



There has been a steady diet of "well democrats could have released the Epstein files as well, but didn't" arguments on the PT board today but somehow you completely overlook that and argue the same thing from the opposing perspective.



Would also love a response on this but I assume I won't get one.
quote:

Like who? Name one. Cite where I've ever copied any of these so called 'conservative' arguments


Pretending to ignore your whole MTV board schtick is laughable but you know that.

quote:

.
A claim as empty as the space between your Dopey ears. ?



Ad hominem attack right on queue per PT board standards.

Edit:

At what point do your arguments evolve into something credible?