- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why do we subsidize bad behavior in the US
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:02 am
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:02 am
Every government program we create always turns into path discouraging work ethic.
I realize we will always have poor people. But in the past 30 years we have had technology that can easily keep track of abusers.
Is it to keep down crime? The most crime ridden locations have very accessible welfare.
Is it to artificially prop up retail and grocery? Why can't Walmart and other big box stores pay the full wages for the labor they require.
Keep politicians funded by agriculture and housing lobby? The same thing is possible with a stable economy and low wage workforce. Arguably better since people will get better positions and thus earn taxable income.
So. What gives?
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:03 am to volod
sorry your rebeloke thread wasnt getting you enough attention
hope this one fares better
hope this one fares better
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:04 am to volod
I’m actually gonna give this one an upvote.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:05 am to volod
Cause the recipients who are abusing the handouts are voters.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:06 am to volod
Because subsidizing bad behavior makes people vote for you
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:07 am to volod
Giving black people free stuff stops them from robbing white people at a higher rate.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:08 am to volod
quote:
Is it to artificially prop up retail and grocery? Why can't Walmart and other big box stores pay the full wages for the labor they require.
I'm not sure what you mean by this? I agree with your overall premise, but anyone over the age of about 7 could work a cash register. If you can count money you can scan groceries and hand someone their change. I don't know why people think they deserve more money to do something a second grader could do and would probably not be a miserable a-hole like most register attendants.
ETA: and the answer to your question is if you give people free shite you lock them into your vote forever. Especially when you're pandering to a generally uneducated demographic.
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 9:33 am
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:14 am to volod
quote:
Is it to artificially prop up retail and grocery? Why can't Walmart and other big box stores pay the full wages for the labor they require.
Walmart pays at least minimum wage.
Why should someone that scans items and hits enter even rate the money they do?
It's unskilled labor.
What they need to do, is have stores that have necessity items.
I remember when I lived in California they had WIC stores. Of course they could go to any other store that accepts it, but it would make ppl feel better they aren't using welfare for crab legs or smokes.
Yes, I know the difference between WIC and SNAP/FOOD STAMPS. just using as example.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:17 am to volod
vote buying passed off as compassion.
There is no question that black people were still very much second class citizens in the early 1960's and that civil rights changes needed to happen. However, does anyone REALLY believe that LBJ genuinely had the best interest of black people in mind when he push the civil rights act through? A southern Democrat from Texas? Give me a break. It was done to make sure black people voted D after Kennedy had started the trend in his campaign.
Certainly I'm not one who agrees lock step with conservative principles and changes for women, minorities needed to happen (though I think it eventually would have happened on it's own accord simply through the evolution of the populace). But to think that these social program are anything more than a handout in exchange for votes is naive
There is no question that black people were still very much second class citizens in the early 1960's and that civil rights changes needed to happen. However, does anyone REALLY believe that LBJ genuinely had the best interest of black people in mind when he push the civil rights act through? A southern Democrat from Texas? Give me a break. It was done to make sure black people voted D after Kennedy had started the trend in his campaign.
Certainly I'm not one who agrees lock step with conservative principles and changes for women, minorities needed to happen (though I think it eventually would have happened on it's own accord simply through the evolution of the populace). But to think that these social program are anything more than a handout in exchange for votes is naive
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:21 am to Cosmo
quote:
Because subsidizing bad behavior makes people vote for you
THIS.
Democrats are just modern day slave owners.
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 9:22 am
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:27 am to volod
Bureaucracies are in the business of perpetuating themselves. Once the agency/organization/Institution has sufficient strength it shifts its primary focus to fortifying and protecting itself . It becomes about protecting the organism against external threat instead of what it’s initial mission was. The surest way to test this theory is to introduce some uncomfortable Truth to the Institution and watch how quickly the focus become you as an external organism attacking them instead of what the issue is. It doesn’t matter if it’s a government agency, your church, your kid’s school , your HOA , anything.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:29 am to volod
quote:
Is it to artificially prop up retail and grocery? Why can't Walmart and other big box stores pay the full wages for the labor they require.
They do have jobs that pay well at those stores...just not the cashier and shelf stocking jobs. Management positions pay well. The problem you have is that those lower paying jobs (cashier, shelf stocking, retrieving shopping carts) were jobs meant to be filled by teenagers looking to get some work experience and to make money for going out on the weekend, but so many of those positions end up being filled by workers in their 30's and 40's who have families to support but don't have a marketable skill to get them better paying jobs.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:35 am to PenguinNinja
quote:
Cause the recipients who are abusing the handouts are voters.
And minorities......you can't leave that part out
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:37 am to Tiger Prawn
That's another problem.
People with jobs who aren't on welfare and are under qualified think they rate the same bennies (insurance, time off, etc) as everyone else.
Don't like it, fix yourself.
There's just as many issues on the positive side.
People with jobs who aren't on welfare and are under qualified think they rate the same bennies (insurance, time off, etc) as everyone else.
Don't like it, fix yourself.
There's just as many issues on the positive side.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:38 am to volod
Buying votes under the guise of trying to help the poor.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:49 am to volod
quote:
Why do we subsidize bad behavior in the US
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:51 am to volod
Its all about money and power.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:52 am to volod
"Progressive" Era
16th Amendment
17th Amendment
19th Amendment
16th Amendment
17th Amendment
19th Amendment
Posted on 1/2/18 at 9:57 am to volod
Soros/Antifa plot to install a constitutional monarchy in this country. They hate George Washington. They want to scrub our history books of the mention of his wooden teeth because they consider it racist which is social Marxism.
Also chemtrails, bigly.
Also chemtrails, bigly.
Popular
Back to top

30











