Started By
Message
locked post

Why aren’t battles from recent wars in our consciousness like past wars?

Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:34 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:34 pm
Many people can rattle off battles from WW2 or the War Between the States for example, but hardly anyone talks about our recent battles in the desert.

Different type of warfare? Public doesn’t care as much?

This post was edited on 4/22/19 at 8:35 pm
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:35 pm to
Put down the weed hippie
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61485 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:35 pm to
Every war since WWII has been pointless so no one really cares
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88334 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:36 pm to
That's how history works.

Are you retarded?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

That's how history works.


Desert Storm was what, 30 years ago roughly? Is that long enough ago to be historical?

Just an example.

This post was edited on 4/22/19 at 8:40 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
197914 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:40 pm to
Darth will drop in and tell you more than you want to know
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
158988 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:43 pm to
Audie Murphy was The Last War Hero. No soldiers were celebrated from Korea, and by the time of Vietnam things had changed so much that at a Chicago restaurant in 1966, a visibly wounded veteran was asked to leave by a waiter b/c his presence "was depressing the other customers".

Film critic Andrew Sarris wrote: "At that moment I realized the Vietnam War was lost. In WWII, that waiter would have been strung up on the spot."
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132599 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Desert Storm was what, 30 years ago roughly? Is that long enough ago to be historical?


There werent really defined battles in that. Our tanks just rolled through and raped once we had air superiority within the first 24 hours
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
7381 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:58 pm to
Perpetual warfare/modern technology

The only climatic stuff maybe the ambassador thing/rescuing that chick from the taliban/bin laden raid.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14976 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 8:59 pm to
We don’t really have any sustained battles anymore.. There are some good Docs on ambush battles of Afghanistan outposts and patrols.. There some good stuff out on Fallujah as well
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118270 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:00 pm to
The enemy is the Democratic Party. They’re not in the desert. They’re all over this country.

They’re based out of Washington D.C.
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5170 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:04 pm to
The United States hasn't fought a war on the scale of WW2 since then. An entire generation was committed to the war effort. The more recent wars have been fought by an increasingly small group of professional military
Posted by VolsOut4Harambe
Baw Land
Member since Sep 2017
14898 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:05 pm to
Simple. WWII and the Civil War were much more interesting than any of the other wars. You have evil, good, heroes, villains, the western civilizations and world powers going at it with each other, genocide, and military-industry complex. Nothing recent compares.
Posted by hottub
Member since Dec 2012
3659 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Every war since WWII has been pointless so no one really cares


Afghanistan, in the beginning, was not pointless. What we are doing now and for the last 8ish years has been pointless.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
158988 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

The United States hasn't fought a war on the scale of WW2 since then. An entire generation was committed to the war effort.
The interesting thing is how united the country became then, and how divided it would be now in a similar situation. How many Americans would be supporting the other side?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:11 pm to
Different type of warfare, fewer casualties
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42394 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Different type of warfare? Public doesn’t care as much?


Because we really didn't win shite......There was no planting the flag on Mt. Suribachi type moment
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39643 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:14 pm to
We haven’t had a real war since WWII
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:15 pm to
Blackhawk Down made the incursion into Somalia a household thing, but still it had relatively few casualties compared to wars fought with epic battles
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 9:20 pm to
Fallujah was a pretty damn big battle that Marines definitely remember.

But we haven’t really had a true foe that could really threaten our military since WWII/Chinese at the Chosin Reservoir.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram