- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is ready for Artemis I? November edition
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to Roll Tide Ravens
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to Roll Tide Ravens
Launch scrubbed
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to Napoleon
Yep. Too bad. Lots of media there for this now on the phone with their travel agents.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to Napoleon
quote:
People who talk about NASA waste really have no clue all the tech that came from NASA or was created to support NASA.
NASA should be focused now on developing probes and leave the rocket development to the private sector. SLS is a fully expendable 4 billion dollars per launch. Starship will have launch costs of just a few million dollars per launch and be 100% reusable. Once Starship is human rated, there is no justification what so ever for SLS to continue to exist. SLS is only needed as a temporary bridge so that the Artemis program can get astronauts to the moon before Starship is human rated for launch.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to Roll Tide Ravens
Elon would have prevented this.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to Roll Tide Ravens
Scrubbed for today
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to StringedInstruments
Next earliest launch window will be Sept 2nd.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to StringedInstruments
It's embarrassing to learn that they wanted to see this in the wet dress rehearsal but couldn't because THAT was halted because of a leaky hose.
I mean seriously, what in the frick is going on here? We pay way too much foe this shite
I mean seriously, what in the frick is going on here? We pay way too much foe this shite
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to GeneralLee
quote:
bloated cost plus contracts on top of it.
We spent like $280 billion (in today's dollars) on Apollo.
Seems like the current project is a bargain so far
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Is the storage tank more protected than the rocket tank?
Not familiar with the hardware or systems but the storage tank is a ground system and can be as robust as needed. The flight tank would be as light as possible.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:40 am to Lonnie Utah
Friday launch seems like it’ll be more fun anyway.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:43 am to GeneralLee
quote:This is 100% true. Artemis has always been NASA's last hurrah. The future is not a government program space system but commercial systems. SLS is over-bloated.
NASA should be focused now on developing probes and leave the rocket development to the private sector. SLS is a fully expendable 4 billion dollars per launch. Starship will have launch costs of just a few million dollars per launch and be 100% reusable. Once Starship is human rated, there is no justification what so ever for SLS to continue to exist. SLS is only needed as a temporary bridge so that the Artemis program can get astronauts to the moon before Starship is human rated for launch.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:44 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
Launch scrubbed
need to update the OP
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:48 am to RATeamWannabe
SpaceX will be headed to Mars while NASA is still only on the Moon.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:51 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Is the storage tank more protected than the rocket tank?
So I'm pretty high, and on a yuge space let down... so i pulled out my grandpa's mini binder of space shite. I found this awesome handwritten section in it, but it didn't address lightning directly I love the title of it.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:51 am to TigerFanatic99
Probably thought the old engines would be fine
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:52 am to TigerGman
quote:
SpaceX will be headed to Mars while NASA is still only on the Moon.
SpaceX is part of this program, too.
Also, it’s not like SpaceX hasn’t had plenty of failures in their history. They do incredible work, but there are still flaws that arise. Yes, they're are ahead of NASA in many ways, but every space program has issues.
This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 8:52 am
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:54 am to TigerGman
quote:
SpaceX will be headed to Mars
By 2040 maybe.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:54 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Probably thought the old engines would be fine
According to the Apollo missions, ancient engines are superior to new.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:55 am to GetCocky11
quote:
By 2040 maybe.
Lol. I give it 7 years, tops
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News