Started By
Message

re: Who is ready for Artemis I? November edition

Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42242 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to
Launch scrubbed
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45721 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:36 am to
Yep. Too bad. Lots of media there for this now on the phone with their travel agents.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13103 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to
quote:

People who talk about NASA waste really have no clue all the tech that came from NASA or was created to support NASA.



NASA should be focused now on developing probes and leave the rocket development to the private sector. SLS is a fully expendable 4 billion dollars per launch. Starship will have launch costs of just a few million dollars per launch and be 100% reusable. Once Starship is human rated, there is no justification what so ever for SLS to continue to exist. SLS is only needed as a temporary bridge so that the Artemis program can get astronauts to the moon before Starship is human rated for launch.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18357 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to
Elon would have prevented this.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24803 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:37 am to
Scrubbed for today
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23887 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to
Next earliest launch window will be Sept 2nd.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27510 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to
It's embarrassing to learn that they wanted to see this in the wet dress rehearsal but couldn't because THAT was halted because of a leaky hose.

I mean seriously, what in the frick is going on here? We pay way too much foe this shite
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51262 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to
quote:

bloated cost plus contracts on top of it.



We spent like $280 billion (in today's dollars) on Apollo.

Seems like the current project is a bargain so far
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16401 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Is the storage tank more protected than the rocket tank?



Not familiar with the hardware or systems but the storage tank is a ground system and can be as robust as needed. The flight tank would be as light as possible.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
24803 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:40 am to
Friday launch seems like it’ll be more fun anyway.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45721 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:43 am to
quote:

NASA should be focused now on developing probes and leave the rocket development to the private sector. SLS is a fully expendable 4 billion dollars per launch. Starship will have launch costs of just a few million dollars per launch and be 100% reusable. Once Starship is human rated, there is no justification what so ever for SLS to continue to exist. SLS is only needed as a temporary bridge so that the Artemis program can get astronauts to the moon before Starship is human rated for launch.
This is 100% true. Artemis has always been NASA's last hurrah. The future is not a government program space system but commercial systems. SLS is over-bloated.
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25945 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Launch scrubbed



need to update the OP
Posted by Palmetto98
Where the stars are big and bright
Member since Nov 2021
2145 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:48 am to
Once again, fake news
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11192 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:48 am to
SpaceX will be headed to Mars while NASA is still only on the Moon.

Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
17891 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Is the storage tank more protected than the rocket tank?

So I'm pretty high, and on a yuge space let down... so i pulled out my grandpa's mini binder of space shite. I found this awesome handwritten section in it, but it didn't address lightning directly I love the title of it.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37043 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:51 am to
Probably thought the old engines would be fine
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42242 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

SpaceX will be headed to Mars while NASA is still only on the Moon.

SpaceX is part of this program, too.

Also, it’s not like SpaceX hasn’t had plenty of failures in their history. They do incredible work, but there are still flaws that arise. Yes, they're are ahead of NASA in many ways, but every space program has issues.
This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 8:52 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51262 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

SpaceX will be headed to Mars


By 2040 maybe.
Posted by Palmetto98
Where the stars are big and bright
Member since Nov 2021
2145 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Probably thought the old engines would be fine


According to the Apollo missions, ancient engines are superior to new.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11192 posts
Posted on 8/29/22 at 7:55 am to
quote:

By 2040 maybe.


Lol. I give it 7 years, tops
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram