- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:17 pm to Hermit Crab
quote:
Is he going to get sponsors to pay for it?
Brought to you by McDonalds and Diet Coke
Eta: this is a dumb idea and the optics are horrible
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:19 pm to Shexter
This awesome. Not the arch, that is ok.
What's awesome is that KingTrump can rustle the jimmies of our prog filth like no other. It's gets better because we have...... 3+ more years of this!!!!!!!!
What's awesome is that KingTrump can rustle the jimmies of our prog filth like no other. It's gets better because we have...... 3+ more years of this!!!!!!!!
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:20 pm to c on z
quote:
So all of the cries about the debt from November 2024 to February 2025 was virtue signaling?
I have no problem with government spending....now....read what I am about to type very slowly so you and everyone else can understand.....
I work for the government however my department is severely underfunded. If you would see what our operating budget is you wouldn't believe it.
If that 'DOGE' money that the found went into actual local municipalities you would likely have a nice city.
However we are constantly fighting with council about spending money on critical things. Im in an essential department and we are told to constantly cut corners or find a cheaper way. That thinking almost always leads to a project being more expensive.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:24 pm to Harry Caray
quote:
I was told republicans are the fiscally responsible ones
What part of "privately funded" are you retards not understanding?
Serious question. I can break it down for you if you're having trouble
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:27 pm to SallysHuman
quote:Mexico will pay for it, amirite?
judging from Trump's way of doing things, it probably won't be by increasing the debt.
That wall, tho.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:31 pm to Shexter
Checks for usual melters
Wasn't disappointed
Wasn't disappointed
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:31 pm to deltadummy
quote:
Cuck boy! TDS!
I guess it shouldn’t be terribly surprising that you like the Arc de Temu
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:34 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
What part of "privately funded" are you retards not understanding?
I understand it just fine
another bribe
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:34 pm to Joshjrn
Would you like it if it was architecural perfection? And if so, can you MS Paint what that looks like for us left brained losers?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:34 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Friendly reminder that we are 38 Trillion in debt.
I think he's paying for it.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:38 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Would you like it if it was architecural perfection?
I’m honestly still rolling around how I feel about a triumphal arch as a gateway to a cemetery, but I appreciate that’s getting ticky tack. Ignoring that, sure, as long as it’s actually privately funded and doesn’t prominently list those funders as though they are sports sponsors.
quote:
And if so, can you MS Paint what that looks like for us left brained losers?
Nope
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:40 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Nope
Jerk
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:41 pm to Darth_Vader
I don’t know why people are so against this. I think it looks nice and is fitting for the 250th. Plus it serves as a symbolic gateway to our most treasured national cemetery.
It’s privately funded so what’s the issue?
It’s privately funded so what’s the issue?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:42 pm to ElJefe686
quote:
The irony of someone who never served in the military asking for a monument named after himself in our national (and almost exclusively military and military affiliated) cemetery is not lost on me.
As if it’ll actually be named for him
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:43 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s privately funded so what’s the issue?
I think it's mostly architectural preference disputes at this point. We're working through them.
I bet Trump would be open to suggestions from the people, since he's the people's president.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I don’t know why people are so against this.
Beside it being totally worthless, I suppose.
I think hes the only one who cares about it.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:44 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Jerk
Jokes about my artistic talents (of which I have none) aside, I’m willing to withdraw my objections, even the triumphal arch at a cemetery bit, if we can get a guarantee that Trump’s name won’t be anywhere on or around the monument. Think he’d take me up on that?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:46 pm to Indefatigable
It’s the same people who tried to cancel the Betsy Ross flag and National Anthem.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 5:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Beside it being totally worthless, I suppose. I think hes the only one who cares about it.
All monuments are “worthless”. If we’re going to build something for the 250th, which I in no way oppose, what’s the issue.
Tons of nations have something similar commemorating a similar occasion.
It could be way way worse. What specifically is your issue with it? Or will we just oppose everything next July because Trump planned it.
Page 8 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News