- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:52 am to PhiTiger1764
quote:
Member when we failed to pass a modest overdue gas tax increase to fund infrastructure? I member...
why do we need more taxes? where are the current taxes going?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
why do we need more taxes? where are the current taxes going?
No one has answered that question yet. they just want more taxes!
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:59 am to PhiTiger1764
quote:
I’m ok with paying more taxes to fund the $14.5 billion dollar backlog of projects in this state.
Perhaps we should have a discussion about efficiencies and cutting the dead weight.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
why do we need more taxes? where are the current taxes going?
Can we stop playing this game with infrastructure funding? The gas tax hasn’t been raised in 30 years. The backlog of infrastructure needs in this state grows by hundreds of millions every year.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:52 am to member12
quote:
Louisiana has the death penalty, right?
Everyone at the DOTD deserves it. EVERYONE.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:54 am to member12
quote:
Who would expect there to be heavy traffic at rush hour in a growing mid market city with crappy highway infrastructure?
Well, I know we’re building shite, but is it actually growing or relocating?
Census Pop. %±
1810 469 —
1840 2,269 —
1850 3,905 72.1%
1860 5,428 39.0%
1870 6,498 19.7%
1880 7,197 10.8%
1890 10,478 45.6%
1900 11,269 7.5%
1910 14,897 32.2%
1920 21,782 46.2%
1930 30,729 41.1%
1940 34,719 13.0%
1950 125,629 261.8%
1960 152,419 21.3%
1970 165,921 8.9%
1980 220,394 32.8%
1990 219,531 -0.4%
2000 227,818 3.8%
2010 229,493 0.7%
Est. 2017 225,374 [36] -1.8%
U.S. Decennial Census[37]
2013 Estimate[38]
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 8:56 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:55 am to PhiTiger1764
where did the money go that funded the initial building of the infrastructure?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:57 am to Pecker
quote:
I don't ever want to be the guy constantly complaining about traffic. I feel like we have too many of that guy.
I feel like you're spoiled as a result of living among an educated society. We don't have that down here in Baton Rouge.
No experience with riots = No opinion
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:00 am to PhiTiger1764
quote:
Can we stop playing this game with infrastructure funding?
No, because the instant voters pass a "dedicated" tax, those useless fricks in the capitol will just take money that was being used for those purposes from other funds and start spending them elsewhere. No more money is spent on the "earmarked" purposes, we've got extra taxes to pay, and they get more money to steal. It's the same thing they did when the money was "earmarked" for education when the lottery started. It's the same thing they'll do any time money is "earmarked".
frick them. Don't give them more money. Make them explain why they're spending money on funding stupid bullshite instead of public infrastructure.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 9:02 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:00 am to PortHudsonPlaya
quote:
It’s like this everywhere
If you don’t like it, then leave
Here for my family
Am missing any excuses?????
Yeah if I live in Texas and have to live next to that fig PortHudsonplaya
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:02 am to Pecker
quote:
don't ever want to be the guy constantly complaining about traffic. I feel like we have too many of that guy.
I doubt traffic is an issue for someone in his Mommy's basement looking at animal pics and taking edgy Men's Health magazine stances.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:04 am to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
TigerstuckinMS
I think maybe we should meet at lunch, drink a few beers and chat.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:12 am to civiltiger07
quote:
where did the money go that funded the initial building of the infrastructure?
This is a vague question with no answer that will satisfy you. But yea, I’m aware that the money has been misused in the past.
That doesn’t change the fact that we have one of the oldest gas taxes in the nation, it hasn’t kept pace with inflation, and that our yearly needs are outpacing our funding by hundreds of millions of dollars.
I don’t think it’s impossible to learn from our mistakes and pass a tax dedicated 100% to infrastructure that can’t be raided by state police or anyone else.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:14 am to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
No, because the instant voters pass a "dedicated" tax, those useless fricks in the capitol will just take money that was being used for those purposes from other funds and start spending them elsewhere.
Is it really impossible to prevent this???
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:15 am to PhiTiger1764
quote:
Is it really impossible to prevent this
Yes, yes it is.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:36 am to civiltiger07
quote:Federal funds.
where did the money come from to build the "new" BR bridge?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:47 am to crewdepoo
quote:
What’s another solution? We don’t have money.
Tolls
I'd be willing to pay for alternate options
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:49 am to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
o, because the instant voters pass a "dedicated" tax, those useless fricks in the capitol will just take money that was being used for those purposes from other funds and start spending them elsewhere
Then "we", the public should make sure its truly dedicated when the tax is designed, and if someone tries to divert it we should, tell them to go to hell. Frankly there is no possible way the state can fix all of this stuff with existing funding options.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:05 am to NOLALGD
They have a nearly a billion dollars annually for capital outlay. Of the 14.3 billion dollar backlog, over 9 is bridges. If those idiots knew wtf they were doing and should some progress maybe, but I'm not sure they've brought in a project close to on time and on budget. They had to rework toll road to Fourchon because the turn wasn't designed correctly. The low bridges between fourchon and GI are being reworked because of poor design. Tide came up and shifted deck. And you want us to give them more money? How about some fricking pink slips first.
Popular
Back to top



1








