- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What is the logic of the slow reopening?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:49 am
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:49 am
Businesses still suffer - doesn't help much there.
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.
It would be far better to just go back to 100% open immediately. Business would have a chance at survival and we may be able to avoid mass poverty and starvation. As I think about it, the slow reopening strategy is a really stupid idea.
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.
It would be far better to just go back to 100% open immediately. Business would have a chance at survival and we may be able to avoid mass poverty and starvation. As I think about it, the slow reopening strategy is a really stupid idea.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:50 am to Landmass
quote:
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.
Please explain.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:50 am to Landmass
More or less to monitor for a potential explosion of the virus.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:51 am to Landmass
Create enough fear so that people will line up for a vaccine that will increase the likelihood of them getting the virus. At the end of the day, it's all about making money.
YT vid on cv19
YT vid on cv19
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:52 am to El Mattadorr
quote:Which part of it do you need to be explained?
Please explain.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:52 am to Landmass
quote:
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.
The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to Landmass
My guess is the goal is to avoid big spread events that would put a shite ton of people back in the hospital in 10-14 days. From a social engineering standpoint, I imagine they think that gradual reopening with a bunch of mask rules and distancing guidelines will provide a better chance of seeing the public actually adopt those things. Whereas if it was just "crisis over, everything reopen" they likely feel people would just disregard all of the measures all at once.
I don't know if that's a wise approach, but I think some of those assumptions are fair and provide part of the basis for staggered reopening.
I don't know if that's a wise approach, but I think some of those assumptions are fair and provide part of the basis for staggered reopening.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to El Mattadorr
quote:
lease explain.
I am struggling to understand what exactly I need to explain.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to Tri City Tigers
quote:
quote:
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.
The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.
Has anyone even TRIED to quantify this?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to Landmass
quote:
What is the logic of the slow reopening? by Landmass
I'll give it to you plain and simple.
Nobody has a clue about anything.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to Landmass
The state and local governments and CDC for that matter are just making up guidelines and rules as they go. It’s honestly pretty ridiculous.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to Landmass
Virus spreading is binary to you? Do you understand how rates work?
If we open slowly, the virus spreads more slowly, and we remain under our hospitals’ carrying capacity.
If we open slowly, the virus spreads more slowly, and we remain under our hospitals’ carrying capacity.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to Landmass
So if the "second wave" Doom and gloom happens, we'll be able to see it coming before it's too late. That's how I understand it from Abbott anyways.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to Tri City Tigers
quote:
The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.
I think we have enough data globally to show that this argument is null and void. Even the most open societies did not overwhelm their hospitals. Quit arguing against the data.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:55 am to Landmass
To ensure that any small business that hasn’t already been completely arse raped gets finished off so Walmarks and Amazon will be the only companies left standing.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:56 am to Mufassa
quote:
If we open slowly, the virus spreads more slowly
Yeah, that is the problem. Do you not understand how immunity works?
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:56 am to UnluckyTiger
They should have been opening as hospital capacity was available. The virus is not going away and people will continue to get it. Might as well have people get it when availability is there.
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:57 am to Landmass
The logic is it’s easier to spend tax dollars and get to that 90% pay out by FEMA
Posted on 5/5/20 at 10:00 am to Landmass
quote:
I am struggling to understand what exactly I need to explain.
The part where slowing the spread of a virus doesn't help mitigate the spread of the virus.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News