Started By
Message
locked post

What is the logic of the slow reopening?

Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:49 am
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
26159 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:49 am
Businesses still suffer - doesn't help much there.
Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.

It would be far better to just go back to 100% open immediately. Business would have a chance at survival and we may be able to avoid mass poverty and starvation. As I think about it, the slow reopening strategy is a really stupid idea.
Posted by El Mattadorr
Member since Mar 2019
2374 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.

Please explain.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24763 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:50 am to
More or less to monitor for a potential explosion of the virus.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26695 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:51 am to
Create enough fear so that people will line up for a vaccine that will increase the likelihood of them getting the virus. At the end of the day, it's all about making money.

YT vid on cv19
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Please explain.
Which part of it do you need to be explained?
Posted by Tri City Tigers
Member since Oct 2018
2343 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:


Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.


The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to
My guess is the goal is to avoid big spread events that would put a shite ton of people back in the hospital in 10-14 days. From a social engineering standpoint, I imagine they think that gradual reopening with a bunch of mask rules and distancing guidelines will provide a better chance of seeing the public actually adopt those things. Whereas if it was just "crisis over, everything reopen" they likely feel people would just disregard all of the measures all at once.

I don't know if that's a wise approach, but I think some of those assumptions are fair and provide part of the basis for staggered reopening.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
108752 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to
Thanks Trump
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
26159 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

lease explain.


I am struggling to understand what exactly I need to explain.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111654 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

quote:

Virus still spreads - doesn't help much there.


The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.


Has anyone even TRIED to quantify this?
Posted by AUriptide
Member since Aug 2009
7459 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

What is the logic of the slow reopening? by Landmass


I'll give it to you plain and simple.

Nobody has a clue about anything.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43714 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to
The state and local governments and CDC for that matter are just making up guidelines and rules as they go. It’s honestly pretty ridiculous.
Posted by Mufassa
Member since Aug 2012
1718 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to
Virus spreading is binary to you? Do you understand how rates work?

If we open slowly, the virus spreads more slowly, and we remain under our hospitals’ carrying capacity.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to
So if the "second wave" Doom and gloom happens, we'll be able to see it coming before it's too late. That's how I understand it from Abbott anyways.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
26159 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

The theory is the virus still spreads, but at a much lower rate. A rate that would not put our hospitals over capacity.


I think we have enough data globally to show that this argument is null and void. Even the most open societies did not overwhelm their hospitals. Quit arguing against the data.
Posted by TulaneFan
Slidell, LA
Member since Jan 2008
14092 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:55 am to
To ensure that any small business that hasn’t already been completely arse raped gets finished off so Walmarks and Amazon will be the only companies left standing.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
26159 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

If we open slowly, the virus spreads more slowly


Yeah, that is the problem. Do you not understand how immunity works?
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8620 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:56 am to
They should have been opening as hospital capacity was available. The virus is not going away and people will continue to get it. Might as well have people get it when availability is there.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42786 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 9:57 am to
The logic is it’s easier to spend tax dollars and get to that 90% pay out by FEMA
Posted by El Mattadorr
Member since Mar 2019
2374 posts
Posted on 5/5/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I am struggling to understand what exactly I need to explain.

The part where slowing the spread of a virus doesn't help mitigate the spread of the virus.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram