Started By
Message

re: What if the Nazis developed an atomic bomb first?

Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18497 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 4:37 pm to
They would have used it, but not in America. That’s a long way to fly, and they didn’t have carriers. Not to mention, by the time the Nazis would have hypothetically made a bomb, our navy and air force was so big, there’s no way it would have reached America. A more likely target would have been London or Moscow. Maybe Paris after the liberation of France.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51787 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

After watching The Bomb on PBS, I speculated this very possible scenario. Hitler surely would have destroyed New York, Washington, and Moscow.


It depends on when they discovered it and then assuming they would have an aircraft which could deliver it. By the time the Allies had detonated the first bomb at Alamogordo, the Soviets had already been in Berlin for a few months.

Let's say we move the clock back a few years to 1940 when the Nazis first bombed London. Had they had a nuke at that time they would have also pursued plane tech which could carry it (Little Boy weighed 9k lb). So if they have both, the war would have been pretty much over and they would have taken all of Europe.

Hitler was very anti-Communist so he would likely have turned his sites on the Soviet Union next. The Soviets at that time had a large military but their officer ranks had been decimated in the Great Purge and they were likely still smarting from the military rebuke in the Winter War. If Hitler had nukes at that time, Operation Barbarossa would likely have gone far different. The Nazis likely would have faced a drawn-out guerilla campaign in the wilderness, but Moscow and Leningrad's falls would have shut down any large-scale, organized military resistance.

Hitler was very aggressive, he didn't like waiting for his next conquest. While they may have ended up with the technology to deliver a nuke to North America after taking off from the UK, Hitler likely would have wanted plenty of boots on the ground to take active control after the dust cleared. That would meant likely taking Iceland to stage for Greenland, then Greenland to stage for New Foundland. From there, they could bring over troops to reinforce their hold then make eventual strikes against Ottawa and DC.

Once the US fell, whatever other part of the world Hitler wanted would have fallen as well. The trick after taking North America would be to consolidate an actual hold on all the territory they conquered.

While the Japanese wanted to take part of the US, I could see Hitler negotiating a deal for the Japanese to keep everything from New Zealand to Iran they could hold while the Nazis took all of North America, the Soviet Union and Europe. Africa, Central and South America would perhaps have been left for a while Axis powers solidified their holds on their gains.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51914 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

The nazis had discovered rockets and bombed London with them. It wouldn’t have taken them long to discover long range missiles. It would have taken something like a submarine bringing one to the shore for the us to be hit.


Dude……

It always cracks me up when people make shite up without considering….well….anything.

Just because a V-2 rocket existed doesn’t mean they were on the verge of being able to deliver a nuke with just a little extra hypothetical effort.

The first nukes were almost as big and heavy as the entire V-2 rocket.

It took another 12 years of research to both shrink nukes and upsize rockets enough to move them.
This post was edited on 1/28/24 at 1:25 am
Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat
Vidalia, La
Member since Nov 2013
4427 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

What if the Nazis developed an atomic bomb first?


Minorities think they’re oppressed now…
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
103905 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

What if the Nazis developed an atomic bomb first?
Less Commies?
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16513 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Maybe you should research it, in depth, and get back to us instead of expecting others to do your work in discounting numbers that have been reported in many sources for decades.


I didn't make the lazy claim. Someone else did. And pointed to a source that just echoed it.

If it's so well established then it should easy to reference some documentation. Go first.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16513 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Let's say we move the clock back a few years to 1940 when the Nazis first bombed London. Had they had a nuke at that time they would have also pursued plane tech which could carry it (Little Boy weighed 9k lb). So if they have both, the war would have been pretty much over and they would have taken all of Europe.


Yep.

This is where some posters are going astray. If Germany had it early on, then that's acway different scenario than say late '44.
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
1402 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:30 pm to
Lots of good insights. I just wondered if Hitler's talented physicists didn't go the heavy water route then they develop a prototype A bomb-possibly before we did.

They developed the Me-262 jet, so maybe Hitler relents and let's his engineers develop a long range bomber comparable to the B-17 or Lancaster instead of the hybrid fighter-bombers (Ju-88s).

Take out London first then turn attention towards Moscow. Getting any A bomb across the Atlantic would be formidable since the U boat advantage had been greatly crippled by then and his naval strength was so weakened.

Interesting to think about.

Something to ponder...
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58341 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

After watching The Bomb on PBS, I speculated this very possible scenario. Hitler surely would have destroyed New York, Washington, and Moscow. How different would today's world be? It was German scientists that discovered fission. What if?


Hell they still wouldn't have had a way to deliver the bomb to the continental US even if they had had one
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64718 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

They developed the Me-262 jet, so maybe Hitler relents and let's his engineers develop a long range bomber comparable to the B-17 or Lancaster instead of the hybrid fighter-bombers (Ju-88s).


Even the B-17 and Lancaster could not make a trip from Europe to the US, especially with a 10,000 lb bomb load. I’d have to check but I’m pretty sure not even the B-29 could pull that off.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12451 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:54 pm to
We knew that was a race we absolutely had to win. Einstein told FDR that in 1939. Fortunately, we did win it.
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
3997 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

After watching The Bomb on PBS, I speculated this very possible scenario. Hitler surely would have destroyed New York, Washington, and Moscow


He wouldn’t have gotten across the Atlantic to bomb the US.

He would have London, Moscow and maybe a second English city, Birmingham or something
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
5812 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:04 pm to
I think there are some movies and a tv show about this
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42947 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:07 pm to
Just be thankful we didn’t have to find out
Europe would definitely be different today
I don’t think the USA would be all that different though
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
1402 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:11 pm to
Right. A trans-Atlantic flight wouldn't have been possible. They would have needed a forward air base. Take out Moscow and Stalin probably just moves his production further east of the Urals.

Any documentation that Hitler's engineers flying-wing (B-2 concept) was more than a theory? I mean, they put the Me-262 into service and even with the small numbers it was more than formidable.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90817 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Blue eyed whites stacked Everyone else fricked I'd be fine with this.


My brown haired green eyed self of Scotch-Irish, French, and Italian ancestry says frick off
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90817 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:31 pm to
Hitler wouldn’t have come after the U.S. mainland. Germany didn’t have the population to hold territory far outside of Europe. He was losing a 2 front war, had he acquired a nuke Moscow would have been target 1. Get Russia out of the way and then nuke London. That would have brought the Allies to the table to negotiate. US would have likely pulled out and let Europe deal with it and like I said the Cold War would have eventually been the US and German empire instead of US and USSR. US probably agrees to end hostilities with Germany if Germany agrees to let UK and France remain independent outside of their control. Let Germany keep Poland, Hungary, etc and Germany occupies western Russia. Russia gets split between German occupation in European Russia and USSR holds eastern Russia and its Asian satellites
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55831 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

What if the Nazis developed an atomic bomb first?

that would have been very bad for the rest of the world
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20446 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:34 pm to
They wouldn't have reached North America with it. Odds are they nuke somewhere in France, and maybe somewhere in eastern Poland or Czechoslovakia, as a means to sue for peace.

For those insisting they would have found a delivery method, their industry was getting crushed. I just watched a Forgotten Weapons episode comparing the 3 semiauto battle rifles, and the Garand was 1, the SVT (Russian) was 2, the German gun was 3rd. That's because they were getting rocked so hard, while in comparison the US was untouched, and Russia had room to retreat and rope-a-dope to the East. Same thing applies to other tech.

If they used it, they would try to stop from being crushed, and most likely our carrier forces make it to the European theater (Japan was finished as a threat long before we smoked them). We likely come at them from the Mediterranean, or airbases in Spain (who would not have stayed neutral with Axis leanings, if Hitler nuked somewhere in Europe). We would have firebombed the shite out of Germany proper, from outside their range. And our own bomb program would have accelerated faster if the Germans deployed it... and our industrial might would not have diminished. So we nuke them from somewhere soon. We probably take out Berlin within a month of them using one.

Now, Europe would be charcoal still today, Britain may be gone, and the US and USSR would be a lot closer allies for a long time... because the Russians would be terrified of us. The Australians would be the heirs to the British Empire, and probably a world power today. They'd likely own most of SE Asia, as far over as India.
*They'd be the next major military bad guy, dealing with popular revolts all across Asia today.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4777 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

We’d be saved from the fricking worse liberals running our country


Imagine being so consumed by political tribalism that you’d prefer the Nazis to shared government with fellow Americans.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram