- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Wuz Kangz. Early Britons were Black.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:33 am to fr33manator
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:33 am to fr33manator
quote:That theory will not be allowed to have holes shot in it
haven’t they recently found a being that predates Lucy in the Balkans somewhere that shoots holes in the out of Africa theory?
Ancient Greeks were black too
and Cleopatra
And Muslims in Spain
and Columbus
4
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:33 am to Pectus
quote:
All humams started off African...twice
Wrong. My people were lovingly creates in the garden of Eden
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:36 am to The Boat
Sounds like shite science.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:36 am to el Gaucho
quote:
My people were lovingly creates in the garden of Eden
You mooslim
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:55 am to The Boat
What’s with the shitty chin hair? Why depict it that way? That alone makes me think this is junk science.
This post was edited on 2/8/18 at 6:56 am
Posted on 2/8/18 at 6:59 am to tilco
So what does this do for the Reparation argument?
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:05 am to The Boat
How could they possibly know this? I call bullshite.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:07 am to The Boat
Then I guess I am into black men.
With the name Cheddar Man & that likeness, this all seems straight out of a horror movie.
With the name Cheddar Man & that likeness, this all seems straight out of a horror movie.
This post was edited on 2/8/18 at 7:08 am
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:20 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
How could they possibly know this?
The article answers your question.
This post was edited on 2/8/18 at 7:20 am
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:25 am to 0
quote:
No protection from the sun will make anybody look like that.
Tanning from being in the sun wouldn’t show up in your DNA.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:30 am to Kafka
quote:
and Columbus
Ah shite...who is to blame for the genocide of Native Americans and eventual colonialism then?
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:33 am to The Boat
buncha insecure white people up in here 
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:34 am to The Boat
Bet they had some nice casinos.
This post was edited on 2/8/18 at 7:35 am
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:36 am to The Boat
I welcome our new baby Jesus
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:36 am to The Boat
I can personally refute this story.
I just tried to dance and rap and I am still terrible at both.
I just tried to dance and rap and I am still terrible at both.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:37 am to The Boat
That chin hair makes me think he’s from Lafayette
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:37 am to The Boat
Looks like a black Lou Diamond Phillips
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:41 am to Masterag
quote:
There weren’t two random Homo sapiens popping up in completely different parts of the world.
there are theories about this. we have three distinct groups (caucasoids, mongoloids, and negroids)
also there are theories that neanderthal-human breeding created caucasoids
this information isn't that ground-breaking anyway. "white people" didn't come into Europe until like 8,000 years ago
quote:
Now, a new study from the same team drills down further into that remarkable data to search for genes that were under strong natural selection—including traits so favorable that they spread rapidly throughout Europe in the past 8000 years.
quote:
When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European’s skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.
quote:
But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.
Then, the first farmers from the Near East arrived in Europe; they carried both genes for light skin. As they interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:45 am to Kafka
quote:
That theory will not be allowed to have holes shot in it
this is probably also true
separate evolution of the different "races" will NEVER be allowed to be accepted, even if it's 100% true
science is very political and not this unbiased source of objective analysis like many believe, especially when it comes to areas that show differences in groups that mirror societal marginalization (you still see studies on this related to sex, so you still see the vitriol in response)
Posted on 2/8/18 at 7:45 am to Salmon
quote:
buncha insecure white people up in here
According to the article, pale skin originated in the Middle East.
That would send the PoliBoard into a frenzy.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News