- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:38 pm to Roaad
Just curious. I didn't read or watch the full video but are you allowed under law to pull a gun and shoot someone dead over a disagreement between 2 people who are visibly having a verbal confrontation only? Thats going to be the question in court. I mean they arent fighting or he isnt trying to subdue her physically. I cant understand how this is legal in her favor. Say whatever about him advancing on her, she was also arguing with him and they were in a verbal disagreement regardless who is following who. He didnt pull a gun out, she did. Is that grounds to shoot someone dead because your in an arguement? She could have also gotten in her car and left but she didnt. She pulled a gun and shot the guy when he got close enough. How is this in her favor. That wasnt a life or death situation to pull a gun.
The man, when he noticed the gun should have removed himself. Dude is completely stupid and paid ultimately for it.
The man, when he noticed the gun should have removed himself. Dude is completely stupid and paid ultimately for it.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:44 pm to Roaad
If I were on the jury I'd vote to acquit. Stand your ground isn't just for YT. Veteran or not don't run up on a scared fellow citizen who has a gun, multiple times. You are not the main character and you don't have plot armor. I am a white.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:46 pm to Roaad
You can find 50% of them on social media saying it was self defense. They reinforce the 50% of them being legally retarded every chance they get.
quote:
In the US: 16% of the Black Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 40% of Hispanic Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 50% of White Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 65% of Asian Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. However, 50% of Black Americans have an IQ below 85.The highest of all races. Why does this matter? According to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), American Psychiatric Association and numerous clinical psychologists, an IQ under 75 indicates cognitive disability, a childlike approach to problems, struggle with long-term consequences and a propensity to violence due to lack of emotional intelligence & communication skills.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:47 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
are you allowed under law to pull a gun and shoot someone dead over a disagreement between 2 people who are visibly having a verbal confrontation only?
A woman is certainly going to have an easier time getting away with it than a man.
You have to be in immediate fear for your life to shoot someone in self defense. You have to be defending yourself while in what a reasonable person would consider a life threatening situation.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:49 pm to jnethe1
quote:
The usual animals that have destroyed Cortana, mall of Louisiana, and everything else they’ve touched.
White people build civilizations. They ten flock to it and destroy it. They do this in every country they are in.
Name one democrat run city by them or country run by them in the world that isn't a sheet hole. Just one.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:51 pm to Roaad
He should have walked away and called the cops. They wold have arrested the low IQ animal for brandishing a gun and he would be alive.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:54 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I agree with what your saying but her saying "she feared for her life" is bullshite because then it can easily be proved by video she wasnt afraid for her life cause although she was waking away she didnt attempt to get into her car and leave, instead she choose to pull a gun and use it over a verbal arguement no matter who follows who. He didnt pull a gun, she did. Jmo. Imo, she is wrong for shooting the guy. If he wanted to physically assault her he surely wasnt in a hurry to do so. Id say she could have full proof case if he had advanced on her at the point of him attempting to physically assault her. Then id say fafo but she also, like I said, could have easily left the scene also and didnt.
I still say if your in arguement with someone and they pull a gun, gtfo and leave pronto. She might have been stupid but he was beyond stupid and it cost him his life.
I still say if your in arguement with someone and they pull a gun, gtfo and leave pronto. She might have been stupid but he was beyond stupid and it cost him his life.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:57 pm to Dadren
quote:
It was likely directed at the handful of posters who absolutely would have made it a race thing if the additional context/video was not added.
Context doesn't matter to the handful of posters you are talking about. They are consistently obtuse as evidenced by this thread and so many others.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:06 pm to facher08
After seeing the full video I don’t think there is a chance the state could get a conviction. I would guess no charges will be filed.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:07 pm to sharkfhin
What is the reason that she pulled the gun in the first place. Seems like that’s a big deal. Not saying this is what happened, because I don’t know, but If you brandish a gun because you disagree with someone and want to intimidate them, then they advance at you and you shoot them, won’t you be at fault?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:10 pm to ItzMe1972
quote:
Dude should have backed off when she pulled the gun.
well he got the parking spot in the end
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:11 pm to SUB
You'd have to watch the video to see.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:15 pm to sharkfhin
Is there a video that shows what was said? The ones I saw didn’t have that.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:16 pm to SUB
If the white shot the black lady instead, cities would be burning tonight
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:17 pm to Roaad
Why can't this ever happen to Cart Narc? Oh yeah he walks away. Still surprised nobody has beat him, but he definitely runs away if needed.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:21 pm to sharkfhin
Idk how it is in Florida but in many states, you arent required to retreat. Hence the change to the thread title - she probably has a right to stand her ground in Florida.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:25 pm to SUB
quote:
What is the reason that she pulled the gun in the first place. Seems like that’s a big deal. Not saying this is what happened, because I don’t know, but If you brandish a gun because you disagree with someone and want to intimidate them, then they advance at you and you shoot them, won’t you be at fault?
Has to be a reasonable fear that life was in danger in the first place. If she initiated the deadly threat there are steps that can be taken where justification can come back in play.
quote:
776.041 Use or threatened use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use or threatened use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force or threat of force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use or threatened use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use or threatened use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use or threatened use of force.
History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102; s. 7, ch. 2014-195.
I read she came out of her vehicle brandishing her gun, but I don’t know if she did enough to regain justification or if it was reasonable for her to fear that her life was in danger.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:25 pm to Oneforthemoney
IQ tests are racist...
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:27 pm to Roaad
she will easily be acquitted…
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News