Started By
Message

re: VIDEO: Florida woman kills man. . .over WalMart parking space. NSFW Could be SYG or murder

Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:38 pm to
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6727 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:38 pm to
Just curious. I didn't read or watch the full video but are you allowed under law to pull a gun and shoot someone dead over a disagreement between 2 people who are visibly having a verbal confrontation only? Thats going to be the question in court. I mean they arent fighting or he isnt trying to subdue her physically. I cant understand how this is legal in her favor. Say whatever about him advancing on her, she was also arguing with him and they were in a verbal disagreement regardless who is following who. He didnt pull a gun out, she did. Is that grounds to shoot someone dead because your in an arguement? She could have also gotten in her car and left but she didnt. She pulled a gun and shot the guy when he got close enough. How is this in her favor. That wasnt a life or death situation to pull a gun.

The man, when he noticed the gun should have removed himself. Dude is completely stupid and paid ultimately for it.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 6:49 pm
Posted by dieabeatyou
Member since May 2024
20 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:44 pm to
If I were on the jury I'd vote to acquit. Stand your ground isn't just for YT. Veteran or not don't run up on a scared fellow citizen who has a gun, multiple times. You are not the main character and you don't have plot armor. I am a white.
Posted by Oneforthemoney
A town near you, la
Member since Dec 2013
2556 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:46 pm to
You can find 50% of them on social media saying it was self defense. They reinforce the 50% of them being legally retarded every chance they get.

quote:

In the US: 16% of the Black Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 40% of Hispanic Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 50% of White Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. 65% of Asian Americans have an IQ of 100 or above. However, 50% of Black Americans have an IQ below 85.The highest of all races. Why does this matter? According to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), American Psychiatric Association and numerous clinical psychologists, an IQ under 75 indicates cognitive disability, a childlike approach to problems, struggle with long-term consequences and a propensity to violence due to lack of emotional intelligence & communication skills.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

are you allowed under law to pull a gun and shoot someone dead over a disagreement between 2 people who are visibly having a verbal confrontation only?


A woman is certainly going to have an easier time getting away with it than a man.

You have to be in immediate fear for your life to shoot someone in self defense. You have to be defending yourself while in what a reasonable person would consider a life threatening situation.

Posted by Oneforthemoney
A town near you, la
Member since Dec 2013
2556 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

The usual animals that have destroyed Cortana, mall of Louisiana, and everything else they’ve touched.


White people build civilizations. They ten flock to it and destroy it. They do this in every country they are in.

Name one democrat run city by them or country run by them in the world that isn't a sheet hole. Just one.
Posted by Oneforthemoney
A town near you, la
Member since Dec 2013
2556 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:51 pm to
He should have walked away and called the cops. They wold have arrested the low IQ animal for brandishing a gun and he would be alive.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6727 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:54 pm to
I agree with what your saying but her saying "she feared for her life" is bullshite because then it can easily be proved by video she wasnt afraid for her life cause although she was waking away she didnt attempt to get into her car and leave, instead she choose to pull a gun and use it over a verbal arguement no matter who follows who. He didnt pull a gun, she did. Jmo. Imo, she is wrong for shooting the guy. If he wanted to physically assault her he surely wasnt in a hurry to do so. Id say she could have full proof case if he had advanced on her at the point of him attempting to physically assault her. Then id say fafo but she also, like I said, could have easily left the scene also and didnt.

I still say if your in arguement with someone and they pull a gun, gtfo and leave pronto. She might have been stupid but he was beyond stupid and it cost him his life.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 7:53 pm
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
6305 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

It was likely directed at the handful of posters who absolutely would have made it a race thing if the additional context/video was not added.


Context doesn't matter to the handful of posters you are talking about. They are consistently obtuse as evidenced by this thread and so many others.

Posted by BPTiger
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2011
6289 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:06 pm to
After seeing the full video I don’t think there is a chance the state could get a conviction. I would guess no charges will be filed.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
26279 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:07 pm to
What is the reason that she pulled the gun in the first place. Seems like that’s a big deal. Not saying this is what happened, because I don’t know, but If you brandish a gun because you disagree with someone and want to intimidate them, then they advance at you and you shoot them, won’t you be at fault?
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
58333 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:10 pm to
quote:


Dude should have backed off when she pulled the gun.


well he got the parking spot in the end
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6727 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:11 pm to
You'd have to watch the video to see.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
26279 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:15 pm to
Is there a video that shows what was said? The ones I saw didn’t have that.
Posted by LSUDAN1
Member since Oct 2010
11433 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:16 pm to
If the white shot the black lady instead, cities would be burning tonight
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
74134 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:17 pm to
Why can't this ever happen to Cart Narc? Oh yeah he walks away. Still surprised nobody has beat him, but he definitely runs away if needed.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72710 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:21 pm to
Idk how it is in Florida but in many states, you arent required to retreat. Hence the change to the thread title - she probably has a right to stand her ground in Florida.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10967 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

What is the reason that she pulled the gun in the first place. Seems like that’s a big deal. Not saying this is what happened, because I don’t know, but If you brandish a gun because you disagree with someone and want to intimidate them, then they advance at you and you shoot them, won’t you be at fault?


Has to be a reasonable fear that life was in danger in the first place. If she initiated the deadly threat there are steps that can be taken where justification can come back in play.

quote:

776.041 Use or threatened use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use or threatened use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force or threat of force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use or threatened use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use or threatened use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use or threatened use of force.
History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102; s. 7, ch. 2014-195.


I read she came out of her vehicle brandishing her gun, but I don’t know if she did enough to regain justification or if it was reasonable for her to fear that her life was in danger.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8842 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:25 pm to
IQ tests are racist...
Posted by Dissident Aggressor
Member since Aug 2011
5810 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:27 pm to
she will easily be acquitted…
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6727 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 7:40 pm to
No doubt but as he passed her she walked forward at him with the gun pointing at him over the top of her vehicle and when he turned around and walked towards her calmly she backed up. I feel like she was 100% involved in an arguement with him not a recessive participant and instigated it as much as he did and played the stand your ground game, like i said she could of gotten in her car and left. He never touched her , if he had wanted to he had lots of time to do so but he didnt. Arguing with someone and the other person pulls out a gun instead of getting in their car and/or calling the cops and/or leaving or going to get help from the store to me, seems more intentional that she was going to show him than "standing her ground" to "save her life at that exact moment". It was a verbal arguement not an attack. On the other hand, this guy was on another level of stupid to even remain once he saw she pulled a gun. People have to watch the whole thing, there is more to the video, while he followed her while they argued, he wasnt in an attack mode or trying to get her in broad daylight, they were just arguing. Neither let the arguement go imo. Both of them could have made a choice to end the arguement and physically leave. Neither did so. Dude is a complete idiot but I feel like the woman over reacted instead of safer options jmo. People will say she had a right to stand her ground. Stand her ground for what? He had just as much right to stand his, he got killed instead. She did have the upper hand for while cause she had a gun and he didnt.
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 7:49 pm
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram