- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Update: woman will NOT be charged in Walmart parking lot shooting
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:58 pm
ABC News link
Original TD thread
Original TD thread
quote:
A Florida woman who fatally shot a man in the parking lot of a Walmart during a confrontation over a parking space won't face charges, prosecutors announced Thursday.
The Broward County State Attorney's Office said Florida's "stand your ground" law makes the shooter, who said she was acting in self-defense, immune from prosecution in connection with the June 30 shooting in North Lauderdale.
quote:
DiGuglielmo "inexplicably abandoned his car in the through lane of travel" and went into the store, before shortly returning to his vehicle, according to the memo. Multiple witnesses reported hearing him say he was going to "mess her car up" and "---- her s--- up," before driving off at a high rate of speed, parking and then walking toward Payne's vehicle, according to the memo. A witness described him as being "visibly angry" while looking at Payne, according to the memo.
Payne exited her vehicle holding a phone in her left hand and a firearm in her right and said, per a witness, "If you keep coming up to me, I'm going to ------- shoot you!" the memo stated.
The witness reported that "despite those warnings," DiGuglielmo continued to approach, and video showed him "aggressively approach" Payne, according to the memo.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 8:59 pm to Ingeniero
This was the logical outcome.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:01 pm to Ingeniero
Called it in the original thread. Especially with the longer video, this guy was very much in the wrong.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:02 pm to Ingeniero
Not sure how they could make a case. He was behaving aggressively, she retreated and gave him a chance to back off, and he still came at her.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:03 pm to Ingeniero
Might be the right call, but black people act like this all the time. Curious to see if the shoe still fits when it's on the other foot.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:04 pm to forkedintheroad
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:07 pm to Ingeniero
I’d think her going to get her firearm and exiting her vehicle with it would negate not being charged when she could have driven off. Has she been inside of her car and he approach then yes. Not taking his side, he was an idiot.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:09 pm to Dixie2023
It's Broward county.
Prosecutor knew this would never be successful
Prosecutor knew this would never be successful
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:14 pm to Ingeniero
Dude was a dumbass and FAFO
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:16 pm to Ingeniero
I remember people in the original thread confused as to why she shot him. But he had that shite coming snd very much was the aggressor.
Good for her.
Good for her.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:38 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Might be the right call, but black people act like this all the time. Curious to see if the shoe still fits when it's on the other foot.
What?
Are you saying if it was a black man aggressively walking towards a white woman, the white woman would have been charged for killing him? In Florida?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:49 pm to Ingeniero
Going by the video I saw, it's the right call.
The guy was being very confrontational and wouldn't let up, even after he saw her with the gun and her doing her best to avoid the situation.
The guy was being very confrontational and wouldn't let up, even after he saw her with the gun and her doing her best to avoid the situation.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:51 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Called it in the original thread. Especially with the longer video, this guy was very much in the wrong.
To be honest this one is a gray area. At one point where she'd drawn her weapon she turned her back to him. Hard to prove fear of bodily harm.
On his part, when somebody points a gun at you, your point is mute. Mouth should be too. If they give you the option to walk, take it.
Can't hear what's going on, cannot tell if she is continuing to provoke him or not. Or if she's just warning him to back off and leave her alone.
Quick note: Has no bearing on the shooting, but here in MO this woman would have been in jail. (Unless it was KC or STL). Substantial history of repeat offender driving without a license, dating all the way back to 2014. Repeat history of not following through on fine payments, and defaulting her cases. Repeat here results in jail after strike 3, minimum 1 year.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:59 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:string her up!!!
Substantial history of repeat offender driving without a license, dating all the way back to 2014. Repeat history of not following through on fine payments, and defaulting her cases
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:04 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
string her up!!!
Nah. I'm just making a point of character.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 10:13 pm
Popular
Back to top

10











