- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: Body found in Brian Laundrie search
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:23 pm to rumproast
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:23 pm to rumproast
quote:
Lejeune claim
That’s negligent infliction of emotional distress. Different elements than IIED. NIED requires you to witness an accident to receive bystander damages for emotional distress. You are confusing the claims.
One of the most famous IIED cases that was successful and went all the Way to the US Supreme Ct was the people that picketed at dead soldier’s funerals with offensive signs. Parents sued and Protesters were found guilty of IIED. It was overturned because of first amendment protest protections. But without that, the verdict would stand. Laundries wouldn’t have that first amendment defense here.
I think that IIED case sets a precedent that you don’t frick with dead kid’s parents.
1
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:25 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
If purposely hiding information from a missing girl’s family isn’t intentional infliction of emotional distress, what is?
Maybe if his parents tortured and killed the girl in front of her parents....or maybe mailed pieces of her to the parents over time.....??? I'd say those would probably get past an exception.... But being silent? No way.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:27 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
Yep...you are right on Lejeune...I amended it already. About the only time I see infliction claims these days....
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:36 pm to rumproast
quote:
I'd say those would probably get past an exception.... But being silent? No way.
Maybe I’m jaded by years of either corrupt or dumb judges not dismissing cases for failure to state a claim. But I’d say the vast majority of judges wouldn’t dismiss. I guarantee there’s a plaintiffs attorney willing to take a shot.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:36 pm to Will Munny
Epstein may have also had an imposter-corpse
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:38 pm to SEClint
Speaking of that did lBL have any dealings with the Clintons?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:45 pm to Funky Tide 8
Woohoo, hopefully this OT jizz fest of two mentally ill individuals in a toxic relationship will finally go away.
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:46 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
Every Plate Customers
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:47 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
In a potential civil case like this, looking back at the investigation that was going on at the time, how would the fifth amendment come into play with the parents?
In a civil case that would allege IIED that would be going after his parents for not talking, how would they be liable for something like that if they stayed quiet because they legitimately believed anything they said could possibly incriminate them?
Does that question make sense?
It seems like that would be saying that you are expected to incriminate yourself in a situation like that or face a potential lawsuit that could very well bankrupt you.
In a civil case that would allege IIED that would be going after his parents for not talking, how would they be liable for something like that if they stayed quiet because they legitimately believed anything they said could possibly incriminate them?
Does that question make sense?
It seems like that would be saying that you are expected to incriminate yourself in a situation like that or face a potential lawsuit that could very well bankrupt you.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:49 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
Is this the longest thread on tigerdroppings?
Classic.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:54 pm to WDE24
quote:
The Wikipedia and law and order lawyers in this thread are embarrassing themselves
It not just that.. the people in here give uninformed opinions and hypotheticals on partial information that may or may not be completely accurate at the time and they stand on their soapboxes and preach the shite like it’s gospel… I get that it’s a message board and it’s perfectly fine to speculate but some of y’all really need to take a step back and understand that at the end of the day, we (the general public) don’t really know shite about what exactly happened or what’s going on ‘behind the scenes’
I’m talking about the crime and the disappearance, not the BS legal shite these dollar general lawyers are bickering about
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 10/20/21 at 8:57 pm to pussywillows
laundrie family attorney discusses what happened today, and other aspects of the case...he states that the FBI was notified on 9/13 that BL didn't return from hiking...this was 2 days after GP was reported missing, the FBI was not even involved at that point...NPPD was not notified until 9/17...
interview, part 1
interview, part 2
interview, part 1
interview, part 2
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:00 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:Probably not any good ones, but because this is high profile someone might. I doubt the Family pursues such.
I guarantee there’s a plaintiffs attorney willing to take a shot.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:01 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:yes and it’s an interesting one
Does that question make sense?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:07 pm to WDE24
Don’t know if this was posted or if this person in Sarasota, Florida is telling the truth but tweeted at 11:41 am
“Got a friend @ the sheriffs dept and they said they just found Brian Laundrie dead w/ a bullet hole in his head in the Carlton Reserve”
“Body was submerged in water and in pieces (probably gators). Water levels came down and that is how the body was discovered “
LINK
“Got a friend @ the sheriffs dept and they said they just found Brian Laundrie dead w/ a bullet hole in his head in the Carlton Reserve”
“Body was submerged in water and in pieces (probably gators). Water levels came down and that is how the body was discovered “
LINK
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:09 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:HEEEEYYYYY. What's wrong with Dollar General????????
not the BS legal shite these dollar general lawyers are bickering about
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:24 pm to tigerskin
quote:I had no idea he knew the Clintons.
hey just found Brian Laundrie dead w/ a bullet hole in his head
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:42 pm to WDE24
quote:
In a civil case that would allege IIED that would be going after his parents for not talking, how would they be liable for something like that if they stayed quiet because they legitimately believed anything they said could possibly incriminate them? Does that question make sense?
It makes a lot of sense and is definitely an interesting question.
Invoking the 5th Amendment doesn’t protect you from civil liability. If you don’t talk because it may implicate you in a criminal matter, that’s your right under the fifth amendment. But you suffer whatever consequences that brings on the civil side.
Say I sell my house in a state that requires you to disclose if a murder occurred (I think a few states require this), and I don’t because I don’t want to incriminate myself for a murder that I committed in the house..
The 5th amendment doesn’t protect me from a suit by a buyer that later finds out you murdered your wife there. Your reason for not sharing the information doesn’t matter.
I think since IIED requires outrageous conduct, the Laundrie lawyer would argue that not talking when implicated in a crime is reasonable, taking you out of the IIED outrageous conduct arena. But, if I represented the Patito family I would say the fact that you have to invoke the 5th shows that you engaged in outrageous conduct not acceptable in society (aka committed a crime). It’s a double edged sword. Who knows how that would shake out.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:49 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
Is this the longest thread on tigerdroppings?
Is this the record for how many times this question has been asked in a single thread.
No, seriously. I've seen this exact question posted at least 10 times in this thread.
Ftr, I have no idea what's the longest thread in TD history.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 9:54 pm to QJenk
quote:
No, seriously. I've seen this exact question posted at least 10 times in this thread.
Nah. It gets asked in every hurricane thread. It is even on our OT Hurricane Thread BINGO(tm) card.
Page 532 of 549
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News