- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: Body found in Brian Laundrie search
Posted on 10/20/21 at 6:59 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 10/20/21 at 6:59 pm to Chucktown_Badger
i believe they've had dogs (both S&R and cadaver) out there one more than one occasion...i find it very odd that his parents' found more evidence in one morning than LE found in weeks...
3
Posted on 10/20/21 at 6:59 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
This is not a good look for the FBI. Guy was in the first place they looked the whole time. Did no one think "hey, he may be dead, let's roll through with the dogs?" Or shite, he didn't even have to be dead for dogs to track/find him.
According to the FBI, the area where the parents said he might be and where his belongings were found was underwater. Looked perfectly dry today. My question is why didn’t they search there once the water was gone before reopening the park?
We don’t know if it was underwater when BL first went to the park or whether it was underwater when the search started.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:03 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
There is really no case against the parents unless they knew it was going to happen.
We don’t know what the parents knew and when. But, I could see a lawyer filing a lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress. They knew Gabby was missing, that she had not returned home, that their son took her van and left her, and they let the parents suffer for weeks by failing to tell them a single thing. This stonewalling of the Petito family gave their son time to get away and die either accidentally or by suicide, thereby preventing the family from getting answers or justice. I think a lawyer can fit that into the elements of IIED. Quite literally the example they give on Wilkipedia for an IIED case (which I know is shite) is not telling someone where their kid is.
With respect to criminal prosecution, it doesn’t matter when Brian’s warrant was issued. Everyone keeps saying it’s impossible for parents to be charged because if they helped him it was done before a warrant was issued. That’s not true.
If someone walks in my house covered in blood and says they just killed their wife. I can’t put them in my car and drive them to Mexico just because a warrant hasn’t been issued yet. I am still an accessory after the fact.
The issue is that they had to know that a crime was committed and then helped Brian in some way (financially, emotionally, supplies, help him buy time to evade police, etc.)
The hard component will be proving their knowledge. But, that knowledge can be proved with circumstantial evidence, so it just depends on what the police have there, if anything.
The fact that they walked police right to where Brian was camping tells me they knew all along where he was. If in his belongings he has supplies that they bought, a burner phone that they bought, etc. it could get bad for the parents. But we have no clue what police have or don’t have on the parents.
So people conclusively saying either—that they will be charged or can’t be charged—have no idea because we have no idea what the parents have done and what the police have uncovered along the way.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:11 pm to pussywillows
quote:
i find it very odd that his parents' found more evidence in one morning than LE found in weeks...
I also find it odd that they went to Walmart yesterday and bought flats of water, FedExed what appeared to be food, and went to the AT&T store yesterday.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:12 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
quote:
But, I could see a lawyer filing a lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Would be dismissed with the quickness.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:16 pm to SEClint
quote:
imposter-corpse.
I think they’re playing the Maryland Death Fest this year
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:16 pm to pussywillows
quote:I dont, I highly suspect them
find it very odd that his parents' found more evidence in one morning than LE found in weeks...
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:18 pm to pussywillows
quote:
.i find it very odd that his parents' found more evidence in one morning than LE found in weeks...
They knew where he was.....why do you find that odd?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:20 pm to SEClint
same here...i've never known LE to allow civilians, let alone the parents of a missing person/POI, to physically search for and handle possible evidence...
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:21 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Would be dismissed with the quickness.
On what basis?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:22 pm to LarryCLE
quote:
Can’t rack up much overtime if you find him right away
Hes right gif
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:22 pm to LSUFAITHFUL
Failure to state a claim. The facts alleged wouldn’t get it done even if true as alleged.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:28 pm to Funky Tide 8
Absolutely nothing about this timeline makes a lick of sense.
They close the Park for 6 weeks using Airboats helicopters, Cadaver Dogs and they come up with zilch. They reopen the park for 1 day...invite parents back in supposedly ..and Presto! Bones and Backpack w notes.
-insert the Broward County FBI psyop w/Nicholas Cruz as evidence.
None of it is convincing, in fact all the evidence continues to suggest BL is not dead. Meanwhile he’s still posting to his multiple social media accounts. And all you ever hear about the reported sightings is the 3 guys who they mistook for BL.
“Law enforcement officials searching for Laundrie Wednesday said they found Laundrie’s backpack and notebook near where the remains were discovered.“
BL himself has set numerous misdirects, why not fake his death too..? Cadaver dogs can smell a submerged body..a backpack with a typical notebook in it would float not sink but it doesn’t get found till today..and for added dramatic effect found ‘near some bones’..
Is it too early to call it a Psyop?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:29 pm to Lee Beauregard
Are you suggesting someone planted skeletal remains in that particular location? I want to hire these people to plan my disappearance.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:31 pm to Lee Beauregard
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:34 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
The remains were found in an area recently under water.
Even if he died in the water, which would be weird, his body would float within 2-3 days and dogs should've still been able to catch his scent from him being in the area even if he was underwater.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:38 pm to billjamin
quote:
However, I think they get smoked on the civil case. Not that anyone will ever get paid besides some lawyers, but I think a jury makes a big award for some fringe legal bs.
This would be a problem that everyone should be concerned with.
The parents aren't talking. If they don't talk and no other evidence is uncovered, there will be no grounds to charge them with any crimes.
If a civil suit is persued and allowed to go forward and her family ultimately wins, that is holding the parents accountable for the actions of their grown child. That is not a good precedent to set.
It becomes even worse if his parents don't talk, but the jury in the civil suit awards her family with whatever amount of money strictly on feelings.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:38 pm to weagle99
quote:
All I am saying is that we (the public) don’t know enough yet to convict in him a court of law, but many of you want to skip a trial and find him guilty based on what you believe to be true. That isn’t how it is supposed to work.
The OT isnt a court of law you fricking retard. It's a message board where we can think what we want. You have enough posts on TD to know how these types of threads go.
And you have to be some kind of stupid to think he didn't kill her
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:42 pm to baybeefeetz
Disagree.
Elements are:
Under Florida law, to state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a complaint must allege four elements: (1) deliberate or reckless infliction of mental suffering; (2) outrageous conduct; (3) the conduct caused the emotional distress; and (4) the distress was severe.
Element 1: Our daughter, who resides with the Laundries was missing for a month. We called and begged the Laundries, with whom
our daughter resides, for a month to tell us when the last time they saw our daughter, heard from my daughter or their son, where they were the last time they talked to them, etc. They hung up on us, ignored our texts and pleas for information. Eventuality we found out that Brian was there the entire time, without our daughter, and that he had stolen her van and credit cards. The Laundries knew that Gabby was separated from her vehicle and that Brian took it and returned home without her. Any parent would know that purposefully withholding this valuable and time critical information about Gabby when she was missing would cause severe emotional distress.
Element 2: this behavior is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.
I don’t think Elements 3 and 4 are up for debate. I’m pretty sure they get past the pleading stage.
Elements are:
Under Florida law, to state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a complaint must allege four elements: (1) deliberate or reckless infliction of mental suffering; (2) outrageous conduct; (3) the conduct caused the emotional distress; and (4) the distress was severe.
Element 1: Our daughter, who resides with the Laundries was missing for a month. We called and begged the Laundries, with whom
our daughter resides, for a month to tell us when the last time they saw our daughter, heard from my daughter or their son, where they were the last time they talked to them, etc. They hung up on us, ignored our texts and pleas for information. Eventuality we found out that Brian was there the entire time, without our daughter, and that he had stolen her van and credit cards. The Laundries knew that Gabby was separated from her vehicle and that Brian took it and returned home without her. Any parent would know that purposefully withholding this valuable and time critical information about Gabby when she was missing would cause severe emotional distress.
Element 2: this behavior is so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.
I don’t think Elements 3 and 4 are up for debate. I’m pretty sure they get past the pleading stage.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 7:42 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
was in the first place they looked the whole time. Did no one think "hey, he may be dead, let's roll through with the dogs?" Or shite, he didn't even have to be dead for dogs to track/find him.
Cadaver dogs were used at the Reserve. When the dogs were first spotted there by media, authorities stated that they were for "training purposes".
I don't know how long used the dogs, or how thorough of a job they may have done covering the Reserve with the dogs.
Page 530 of 549
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News