Started By
Message

re: United Airlines say if Americans were less fat they could save 80 million on fuel

Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:06 am to
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12724 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:06 am to
Just by the author’s writing style, I smell bull excrement, but she may be on to something if you multiply it over the hundreds of thousands of flights UA flies each year. It really comes down to a rounding error.

You are talking about 1,000 less pounds on jet that typically weighs several tons with 100 passengers.


Next thing you know, someone will say let’s physically remove the empty seats on a plane for fuel savings, the airline will then spend double or triple the savings on fuel for the added labor cost of the removal and installation of the seats in the plane. But some egg head in management said it would save the airline some money.

You could also just tell people to pack less crap and lighten the luggage.


I had this happen at work. Someone complained about using and wasting bottled water. So they went ahead and purchased 2 new water coolers and started getting Kentwood water delivery and a boxes of paper cups for water. Running the numbers it was still cheaper to to purchase 40 packs of bottle water at Sam’s.

This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 7:16 am
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:24 am to
quote:

redstick13


I don’t disagree with using BMI, but there are a lot of in-shape folks in the “overweight” category. I’m on the edge of healthy and overweight and I’m in great shape. Once you edge over into obese, though…

Maybe use body fat percentage as the measure and use smart scales or body scanners at the airport to impose surcharges on the whales. That also builds embarrassment and public shame into the equation, which there isn’t enough of these days for fatsos.
This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 7:27 am
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
9178 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Then let's start paying for flights by the pound
would love this. Step on a huge scale with yourself , your bags, and your carryons .
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Then let's start paying for flights by the pound
would love this.


Sightseeing helicopters charge a 50% surcharge locally if youre over 250.

Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1933 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Luggage is not due to fuel it’s due to the bag guy having to handle your bags different because of the weight.


What does this look like? Genuinely curious.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Maybe use body fat percentage as the measure and use smart scales or body scanners at the airport to impose surcharges on the whales.


Weight is weight
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89828 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:53 am to
That’s why you should pay per weight.

Like when shipping something.


Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40884 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 7:57 am to
quote:

would love this. Step on a huge scale with yourself , your bags, and your carryons .


This is exactly how it works when you take a chopper offshore.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26542 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:09 am to
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42369 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Charge by the pound then.


Give space proportionate to pay as well
Posted by GeauxTigers123
Member since Feb 2007
3699 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Sightseeing helicopters charge a 50% surcharge locally if youre over 250.


Do they weigh everyone or just the really big folks.
This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 8:13 am
Posted by Ohiotigerfan
South of I-10
Member since Oct 2004
1302 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:17 am to
No they would book more air freight. Made the should charge by the pound?
Posted by Polycarp
Texas
Member since Feb 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:22 am to
I don’t really care about saving them money. I thought they were going all DEI anyway?
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44439 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:24 am to
Like a moth to a flame, the OT’s super athletes come to shite on the BMI metric. Never fails.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20635 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:30 am to
quote:

How the frick it's ok for a 300lb+ person to pay the same as someone under 200lb, yet 10lb over on your luggage results in fees like that is absolutely ridiculous.


Bc fat shaming and social media backlash.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59227 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:33 am to
quote:

How the frick it's ok for a 300lb+ person to pay the same as someone under 200lb,

You’re not a real man unless you weigh 200 lbs
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20635 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Like a moth to a flame, the OT’s super athletes come to shite on the BMI metric. Never fails.


I’m not a “super athlete” by any means, but the BMI chart has been shown to have some significant drawbacks.

Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Aubie Spr96

I’m in the health and fitness board running thread with you. You know I’m not in shitty shape. Whatever runs I post on there are about 1/6 of what I do throughout the week, depending on the week, and split between gym, bike, run, and swim.

But for someone that only and exclusively runs or does nothing but endurance work, I can see why one would be convinced that the BMI scales are 100% applicable across the human population. Skinny fat is a thing, even for some endurance athletes.
This post was edited on 10/27/24 at 12:31 pm
Posted by Pitt Road
Mid-Florida
Member since Aug 2017
1200 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

It may save the airline a ton of $, but it won’t be in fuel savings because takeoff and landings are the only time weight matters.


I don't believe this is correct, the more weight, the more drag, the more drag, the more fuel at cruise.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20424 posts
Posted on 10/27/24 at 10:45 am to
Sugar is a poison that kills slowly, but effectively.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram