Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Ultimate "Piss You Off" Story for Today

Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:38 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19811 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:38 pm
Colorado. A family in their backyard at a toddler's birthday party. Next door lives a Deputy K9 handler. The K9 gets loose, jumps the fence, grabs a hold of the little girl, breaks her femur, disfigures her, and attacks the dad who tried to help. (Dad said he could hear the dog crushing his daughter's bones). Both little girl and dad were in hospital. Total medical bills were about 300k.

DA prosecuted the deputy for "harboring dangerous dog." The Deputy invoked qualified immunity and said since he was cleaning his dog's pen at the time, this constituted "official duties." The jury bought it and he walked.

The family tried to get an attorney for a civil suit, but every attorney rejected the case saying it's impossible to win because of how well the law protects negligent Cops. The dad also said the Department promised they would "make it right" but lied and have done nothing. They won't even reply to the media for comment. Total POS department.

Posted by Gifman
Captiva, FL
Member since Jan 2021
19681 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:39 pm to
Sounds like a piece of shite jury
Posted by DarkDrifter
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
5937 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:42 pm to
I'm going Law Abiding Citizen on the Dog and the Neighbor...
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
28009 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

The Deputy invoked qualified immunity and said since he was cleaning his dog's pen at the time, this constituted "official duties." The jury bought it and he walked.
This just doesn't make sense.

Beyond the fact that claiming this as official duties is nonsense...If a K9 officer WAS actually out patrolling, and the dog got out of the car and attacked an innocent bystander, wouldn't the department be liable for damages???

I don't understand how they got to 1) say it was official duties for qualified immunity and 2) not be liable if it was official duties
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:44 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78060 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:46 pm to
White women would raise money for this little female, but they gave all of their money to a child murderer.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36667 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I don't understand how they got to 1) say it was official duties for qualified immunity and 2) not be liable if it was official duties


Yea, someone is at least civilly liable. It's actually better that he was performing "official" duties, because that should put the city on hook. A K9 is a police officer. This should be no different than if a cop personally did this.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
28009 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Yea, someone is at least civilly liable. It's actually better that he was performing "official" duties, because that should put the city on hook. A K9 is a police officer. This should be no different than if a cop personally did this.
Agreed. As a simple spectator from a website reading about this, It doesn't anger me that the K9 and cop are pulling qualified immunity on some BS technicality. But the family not getting paid out by someone or getting an answer to anything kinda pisses me off.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
45439 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:52 pm to
I can understand why the deputy wasn't charged, but if it was official duties the police dept. should be liable.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74688 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:06 pm to
I’m no lawyer, but if a K9 is considered to an officer like any other cop, what would be the legal, both criminal and civil, consequences if a human cop had jumped the fence and attached this little girl causing her serious bodily injury?

There has to be some liability on the part of this city and its police department of some sort, right?
Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1669 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

There has to be some liability on the part of this city and its police department of some sort, right?



the civil judgement will be significant, sucks that little girl and her dad had to go through that.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:27 pm
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
17755 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:37 pm to
Yeahhhhhhhh that guy would be getting a visit after a year or two of cooling off
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
7173 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:38 pm to
My question is why did the dog become aggressive? I thought most K9 police dogs are pretty chill until instructed otherwise.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92429 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:48 pm to
It’s just a few bad apples
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
11939 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:04 pm to
Bootlickers rejoice
Posted by KingOfTheWorld
South of heaven, west of hell
Member since Oct 2018
7967 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:07 pm to
Somebody and their “K-9” are dying.
Posted by Flapjacks
Member since Oct 2023
284 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a piece of shite jury


I have some good friends from Colorado, but the politics of that state lately make me think they have a majority of shitheads.
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
34317 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 6:14 pm to
Sounds like if dad would’ve shot the dog he’d have been charged with murdering a cop.

Very fricked up
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6315 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:14 pm to
Shouldn't this be a federal lawsuit? Colorado can pound sand.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139245 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:34 pm to
That dog would be getting plenty of antifreeze milk bones tossed over the fence
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
63358 posts
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:52 pm to
I will have to think about the criminal charges….but I don’t believe for a second that they couldn’t find an attorney to handle a civil case for them….
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram