Started By
Message

re: Turing Pharma still selling AIDS med @750$/pill, but has new competition@1$/pill

Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

. This also provides incentive for a cheaper drug. What he did wasn't necessarily "wrong".


You're an arse. Complete and total arse.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
21310 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:45 pm to
The Fed will find a way to make the 1$ med unavailable or not meet some required cryptic requirement for distribution.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11987 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The FDA



The Fed doesn't regulate anything but monetary policy baw.
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5910 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

You're an arse. Complete and total arse.

You sound like a person on my FB feed that said "we dont need a business man for president, we need someone with a heart" (obviously in support of Bernie). Sounds like you don't understand economics. What I said is the cruel nature of business.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47486 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Investors applauded the move, driving Imprimis shares (IMMY) up 7% to $6.41 in early trading Friday.


Somebody liked the move


Those investors drove it up from $5.97 to a whopping $6.41!?????
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
8057 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

How? The drug was toxic and had been around for a while. More profits is more money towards research. Kinda nuts how people don't understand the concept of making money. He bought the company and had every right to raise prices. Simple as that. These drug companies simply cannot make money at how much it costs to make a drug. People who hate Skhreli are the same people who go out and buy Iphones but don't care that they are made in shitty factories in bad conditions at high profit margins. No one complains about Tim Cook.


Sure, he had the right to raise prices, but doing it in a way that invited another entrant was pretty dumb.

Your other points about drug companies are just a regurgitation of what big pharma wants you to believe. Why don't you look at the marketing budgets of a pharmaceutical company in comparison to R&D.

We understand business just fine.

Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47486 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

The anti-Shkreli circlejerk is kinda annoying. He raised the price of a drug because drug companies already operate on a loss. This was to fund more research for a better drug. This also provides incentive for a cheaper drug. What he did wasn't necessarily "wrong".


100% this.

The knee jerk reaction was typical.

The real-life situation could be way different.

Wait to see if IMMY gets on the formulary lists.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11987 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Why don't you look at the marketing budgets of a pharmaceutical company in comparison to R&D.


I would think this is justified. There is a rush to market a product that faces patent cliffs. Once the patent expires it's free game for anybody to produce a generic version.
Posted by cyogi
Member since Feb 2009
5145 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Shkreli

Has absolutely no clue what he's doing.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184680 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:25 pm to
In his defense, the CEO that raised the price said that doing so would make other companies interested in making alternatives to this drug and even spur research into other areas of needs in that market. He was 100% correct apparently.
Posted by Brian12
Member since Apr 2015
392 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:35 pm to
That reminds me of the rumor that a 100 mpg carburetor was bought and shelved by an oil company back in the 80's. I seriously doubt its true but then again you never really know.


quote:

Over the years, I've heard several people say that they believe there is already a cure for things like cancer and aids, but that the money is in the treatment and not the cure so these drugs never see the light of day. I think that's total horseshite,because I don't think people/companies are that evil, plus a hell of a lot of money could be made off the cure too. People believe some outrageous shite.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

You sound like a person on my FB feed that said "we dont need a business man for president, we need someone with a heart" (obviously in support of Bernie). Sounds like you don't understand economics. What I said is the cruel nature of business.


I get what you're saying, but Shkreli is an a-hole. He is. Does that make him a bad CEO? Not necessarily. Losing $55 million because you tried to price gouge your customers? That's a bad CEO.

He tried to jack up the price and got undercut by getting too greedy. He deserves everything that is coming to him.

It's almost like you are defending him and assuming this price gouging scheme he has is a good idea. All its going to do is raise competition, the exact point of a free market economy.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 2:37 pm to
The story is a little more complicated than some of y'all think. The new company's version of the drug is not FDA-approved. The only reason they can do this is that they will compound the drug custom-made for each person who uses it instead of mass-manufacturing the pills. The FDA has traditionally looked the other way for cases like this because of the low volume that is usually involved.
Posted by The Boob
Member since Mar 2010
773 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 2:44 pm to
Shkreli has his own hedge fund

Gouges prices

Hillary announces plans to regulate

Pharmaceutical market plummets on news of regulation

Skreli and friends short the market all the way down with their hedge fund money

He never planned to make money on his drug company, it was just a tool to manipulate the market, and for that I think he's a genius
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

If only people could realize that this is the perfect example why regulating drug prices is unnecessary. Another example is the pricing war between viekira pak and harvoni. The competition has already put pressure on GILD to lower prices. But maybe that's just me


Too bad Viekira Pak has been killing people...
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52820 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 3:47 pm to
Actually he won't lose any money. From Reddit.

quote:

Not a chance. Turing was probably making a little profit at 13.50 per pill. They only have to sell 2% of what they used to sell to make the same amount of money at the $750 price. This competitor is a compounded drug, which means it can only be made and sold to individuals with a prescription. So they cant make the drug, ship it around the country and let it sit on shelves until someone buys it. Turing can. So unfortunately Turing will be losing no money and laughing all the way to the bank.
This post was edited on 10/23/15 at 3:48 pm
Posted by sullivanct19a
Florida
Member since Oct 2015
5239 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

The anti-Shkreli circlejerk is kinda annoying. He raised the price of a drug because drug companies already operate on a loss. This was to fund more research for a better drug. This also provides incentive for a cheaper drug. What he did wasn't necessarily "wrong".


i dont believe that. can you source it?
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47486 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

i dont believe that. can you source it?


He talked about it in one of the hit-job knee jerk interviews he did back in the firestorm days after he raised the price.

Probably search Diane Sawyer or something... you'll find it.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10747 posts
Posted on 10/23/15 at 4:15 pm to
Love it. Anything to crush the biotech bubble.

LABD all the way to the bank.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram