Started By
Message

re: Treatment for infant muscle wasting disease to hit market. potential price: $2 million

Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:15 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64330 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

When does this actually happen though? People that need it seem to find a way.


Here is another example...

quote:

Woman says her son couldn't afford his insulin – now he's dead


quote:

When Nicole Smith-Holt's 26-year-old son died, he had just moved out of his parents' home and was starting a life of his own.

"The hardest part is every time I tell the story, it's like reality slaps me in my face that my son is no longer here," Smith-Holt told CBS News correspondent Anna Werner.

Her son, Alec, was a Type 1 diabetic – someone who needs to take insulin every day to survive. But turning 26 meant his parents' insurance would no longer cover the cost, shooting his monthly cost for insulin and supplies up to $1,300 per month, according to his mom.


What makes me mad about this is that while this guy died because he couldn’t afford insulin, if he’d have been a junkie instead of a diabetic, he could go down to the Methadone clinic and got the drugs he needs for free.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Here...
quote:

They found that kids who lacked health insurance were 60 percent more likely to die in the hospital than were kids who had insurance. After adjusting for such differences as race and gender, uninsured kids were still 37.8 percent more likely to die than kids with insurance coverage.


Causation and correlation. From that same article:

quote:

And though the study does not prove that being uninsured boosts a child's mortality risk, it does suggest a strong association between insurance status and odds of dying.


They didn't die because they lacked health insurance. They died because their parents/guardians didn't pursue treatment (free treatment in all likelihood) when a problem arose.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
36937 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Well your issue is with the insurance company, not really the wheel chair manufacturer.


Is it? Is the insurance company marking up the product and taking a cost?

I think the problem is more with the retailer that the insurance company is making him use.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
36937 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

They didn't die because they lacked health insurance. They died because their parents/guardians didn't pursue treatment (free treatment in all likelihood) when a problem arose.



...

Becuase they could not afford the treatment. Because they did not have insurance to help shoulder the cost.

If I don't have car insurance, I'm not more likely to cause an accident. But if I do get into an accident, dealing with it is going to be a lot harder if I don't have car insurance.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20225 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:32 am to
It's a bold move. I'd imagine it's pretty hot where these decision makers are headed.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Her son, Alec, was a Type 1 diabetic – someone who needs to take insulin every day to survive. But turning 26 meant his parents' insurance would no longer cover the cost, shooting his monthly cost for insulin and supplies up to $1,300 per month, according to his mom.


That doesn't make sense. I'm sure that's what it felt like to his mother, but that number seems awfully high, and there are plenty of ways to lower it.
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
5788 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:36 am to
Just wait until there is a cure for all cancers. There will be wars started.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Becuase they could not afford the treatment. Because they did not have insurance to help shoulder the cost.


That's not how it works in the real world for multiple reasons, Medicaid being one of them. Healthcare is more complicated than necessary, I'm not arguing otherwise, but there are plenty of resources available for people who "can't afford" it.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Is it? Is the insurance company marking up the product and taking a cost?

I think the problem is more with the retailer that the insurance company is making him use.


The insurance company and providers negotiate many of those rates. If the wheel chair provider is selling the SAME chair for $330 on Amazon, blaming them makes no sense.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
36937 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 11:01 am to
quote:

That's not how it works in the real world for multiple reasons, Medicaid being one of them. Healthcare is more complicated than necessary, I'm not arguing otherwise, but there are plenty of resources available for people who "can't afford" it.



There are holes in the safety net. Even after Obamacare/Medicaid expansion.

That complexity just makes the holes larger.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
36937 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 11:04 am to
quote:

The insurance company and providers negotiate many of those rates. If the wheel chair provider is selling the SAME chair for $330 on Amazon, blaming them makes no sense.


If the retailer has to deal with an insurance claim, there is a cost associated with that (processing/admin costs). But that's not 10X the cost of the equipment itself.

I think the retailer realized that he could bilk more money out of the insurance company - significantly more -than if he sells it direct.

And the insurance company just raises rates or shifts cost-sharing to cover it.
Posted by LSUtwolves
Member since Jun 2016
846 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 11:14 am to
are you saying there should be some kind of government regulation? sounds like libtard hogwash
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9515 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

I am usually in the drug company’s corner but if they are pricing this because they can hold people “hostage” with the life of their child instead of some sort of cost/amortization basis


What do you mean by this? Amortization has nothing to do with pricing.

People don't understand that a capitalistic society is exactly why the U.S. and other countries were able to innovate medicine as fast as they have.

As a biotech company owner, would you take huge amounts of risk, spend billions, and devote years to researching treatments for a capped margin of X percentage? No... you'd play it safe and stick with selling current drugs.

People need to understand the world isn't perfect, but if you like innovation then you need to accept that companies will charge a shitload for groundbreaking discoveries.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

What do you mean by this? Amortization has nothing to do with pricing.


It's not exactly amortization, but he's pointing out the company is going to recoup their investment plus their margins.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9515 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

It's not exactly amortization, but he's pointing out the company is going to recoup their investment plus their margins.


Figured so.

Let's just make a regulation capping margins at 70% and see how fast companies stop innovating

Not to mention the accounting behind all this
Posted by Norbert
Member since Oct 2018
3117 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Only the wealthiest of the wealthy will be able to pay for it.


At first...
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Seems cruel but these people don't work for free either
you're right they get government grants
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61042 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

you're right they get government grants



And they develop something that previously didnt exist. Should they not receive government funding?
Posted by Open Dore Policy
The Commodore State
Member since Oct 2012
4472 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Even at $2M, most of us would probably be willing to pay for their own children.




Abso-fricking-loutly.

And I understand the work that goes into it, but there should be no reason that we as a culture shouldn't give a baby anything that can help or save their life.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:50 pm to
It amazing the lengths people will go to justify greed
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram