- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tort reform bill just passed the house by a veto-proof majority, 72-28.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:17 pm to FearTheFish
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:17 pm to FearTheFish
quote:
Eliminating collateral source?
Collateral source isn't that big a deal. No one really cares that much about it.
The jury threshold is an absolute killer and will have far reaching, catastrophic unintended consequences for the court system over the next decade. It is asinine.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:19 pm to skinny domino
I’m not seeing any other source saying the bill passed the house or by what margin. Anyone have a link?
Edit: LINK
Edit: LINK
This post was edited on 5/29/20 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:20 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
So when do my insurance rates drop?
lulz
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:22 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
The jury threshold is an absolute killer and will have far reaching, catastrophic unintended consequences for the court system over the next decade. It is asinine.
And yet, every other state in the country has survived either with jury thresholds lower than $15,000, or no threshold at all.
Why exactly will this be soooooo catastrophic?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:23 pm to Indefatigable
Because the attorneys are going to lose the money that comes from judges siding favorably with them.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:23 pm to jrobic4
quote:
Please, please tell me you're joking! We're talking about the Louisiana house.
quote:
Tort reform bill just passed the house by a veto-proof majority,
I didn't see Louisiana in the subject line.......so......how was I supposed to know I don't live in Louisiana nor to I follow their politics?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:25 pm to ultratiger89
quote:
I didn't see Louisiana in the subject line.......so......how was I supposed to know I don't live in Louisiana nor to I follow their politics?
Because tort law is typically a matter of state law rather than federal law.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:25 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
will have far reaching, catastrophic unintended consequences for the court system over the next decade. It is asinine.
Hey look. I found a slimy lawyer on TD
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:26 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Collateral source isn't that big a deal. No one really cares that much about it.
Nobody cares about collateral source? Seriously? So when a plaintiff has 300k in medical charged and 80% of that is written off by the hospital you don’t think that matters to plaintiff lawyers and damage calculations now? That’s a huge part of damage calculations, especially to uninsured plaintiffs. They could ask the medical providers to hold off on write downs, but medical providers may in turn demand money from the settlement as a quid pro quo. Either way, it’s a big deal.
This post was edited on 5/29/20 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:26 pm to Slippy
I tired telling her this had nothing to do with her being a woman. But that she was a liberal lawyer against tort reform that actively encourages women to murder their children. Thats why people dont like her.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:28 pm to Fun Bunch
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:30 pm to brewhan davey
quote:
Because tort law is typically a matter of state law rather than federal law
you're right, I had heard talk of federal tort reform for businesses opening back up to prevent lawsuits in case people got COVID.....but again I don't follow all the bills and shite going through even the federal legislature and I'm not a lawyer.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:31 pm to go ta hell ole miss
quote:
Nobody cares about collateral source? Seriously? So when a plaintiff has 300k in medical charged and 80% of that is written off by the hospital you don’t think that matters to plaintiff lawyers and damage calculations now? That’s a huge part of damage calculations, especially to uninsured plaintiffs. They could ask the medical providers to hold off on write downs, but medical providers may in turn demand money from the settlement as a quid pro quo. Either way, it’s a big deal.
This
I'm guessing that guy is pissed that he can no longer have his Dr. buddies ramp up artificially high medical bills for his clients' damages claims.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:32 pm to Scruffy
MS has a jury trial threshold of $200. Courthouses aren’t packed.
I’ve said it time and time again, lawyers on both sides will have to get serious about their cases. No more taking expected damages awards for granted, to an extent. Juries will pop you when you don’t expect it and, at least in MS, sometimes award zero for extremely minor accidents.
I still have no idea how the elimination of collateral source will work. Will someone from a health insurance company have to be called to testify about what was actually paid?
I’m completely neutral and not hypocritical at all. This may take cases from me and I realize that. I just STRONGLY support the Seventh Amendment.
I’ve said it time and time again, lawyers on both sides will have to get serious about their cases. No more taking expected damages awards for granted, to an extent. Juries will pop you when you don’t expect it and, at least in MS, sometimes award zero for extremely minor accidents.
I still have no idea how the elimination of collateral source will work. Will someone from a health insurance company have to be called to testify about what was actually paid?
I’m completely neutral and not hypocritical at all. This may take cases from me and I realize that. I just STRONGLY support the Seventh Amendment.
This post was edited on 5/29/20 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:33 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
lawyers on both sides will have to get serious about their cases
Queue "I value the case at eleventy billion dollars"
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:33 pm to Indefatigable
A certain hospital in Mississippi bills $11,000 for a lumbar MRI but has an agreement with BCBS to only pay about $4,000. Plaintiff gets to show the jury the $11,000 bill though 
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:35 pm to dgnx6
quote:
I tired telling her this had nothing to do with her being a woman. But that she was a liberal lawyer against tort reform that actively encourages women to murder their children. Thats why people dont like her.
I read this in a drunken slur.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:36 pm to go ta hell ole miss
quote:
Nobody cares about collateral source? Seriously? So when a plaintiff has 300k in medical charged and 80% of that is written off by the hospital you don’t think that matters to plaintiff lawyers and damage calculations now?
No, most don't care.
The jury threshold destroys city courts that make up a large bulk of dockets and disposes of all of the small time claims.
Those are now gone. Cases worth 10,000.00 will take 7 years to get to trial.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 3:37 pm to Fun Bunch
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 12:58 pm
Popular
Back to top


8






