- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The “time price” of square foot of housing is 24% lower than the 1950s
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:47 pm
The myth that your parents and grandparents had it better off re housing
Jeremy Horpedahl, an associate professor of economics at the University of Central Arkansas and a Cato Institute adjunct scholar, completed an analysis on housing amenities and found the following:
Jeremy Horpedahl, an associate professor of economics at the University of Central Arkansas and a Cato Institute adjunct scholar, completed an analysis on housing amenities and found the following:
quote:
On average, only 22 percent of homes had the amenities Horpedahl looked at in 1956; today, 82 percent of them do.
quote:
Median home size has almost doubled, rising from about 1,150 square feet in 1956 to roughly 2,210 square feet today. Over the same period, average household size has shrunk from 3.3 people to 2.51. The result is a dramatic increase in living space per person—from just 348 square feet in 1956 to about 880 square feet today. That’s 532 more square feet per person, or a 153 percent increase. Had space per person stayed at its 1956 level, the typical home today would measure only about 874 square feet.
quote:
The median home cost about $14,500 in 1956—roughly $12.61 per square foot. With average wages at $1.85 an hour, each square foot required 6.82 hours of earning. Today, the median home price is about $420,300, or $190.18 per square foot. However, average wages have risen to $36.53 an hour (before benefits), bringing the time price down to 5.21 hours per square foot. So, while the dollar price per square foot has risen 15-fold, wages have increased nearly 20-fold. The result is the time price of housing has fallen by almost 24 percent.
Compared to 1956, we now enjoy 532 more square feet per person as well as homes packed with 3.7 times more amenities—and all of it for about 24 percent less time per square foot.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Crock of shite
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:53 pm to TheGeauxt9
Do you have alternative data?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:56 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why 1956? The people that bought those homes are dead. You should compare the year Boomers were in their late 20s or early 30s. So that would be the late 70s into the 80s.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Square footage on homes is often overlooked when people compare prices across different decades.
My grandmother's house had 2 bedrooms, one bath, and a window AC unit added much later.
No one would stoop to buy a house like that these days.
My grandmother's house had 2 bedrooms, one bath, and a window AC unit added much later.
No one would stoop to buy a house like that these days.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Human Progress
What in the hell is this publication ?

Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:00 pm to LSUSUPERSTAR
quote:
be the late 70s into the 80s.
I think other than higher percentage of HVAC and ranges the rest wouldn't be so drastically different. A 2,000 sq ft house was gigantic in 1990, at least in south louisiana.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:01 pm to Archives
Yep.
This is the “dream house” that a 1965 auto worker in Michigan was living in
This is the “dream house” that a 1965 auto worker in Michigan was living in
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
University of Central Arkansas and a Cato Institute adjunct scholar
lol
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Interesting choice in year to cherry pick. I’m sure that wasn’t intentional…


Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:03 pm to Archives
quote:
Square footage on homes is often overlooked when people compare prices across different decades.
Compare any house in BR in 2010 to now and get back to me
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:04 pm to Archives
quote:
Square footage on homes is often overlooked when people compare prices across different decades. My grandmother's house had 2 bedrooms, one bath, and a window AC unit added much later. No one would stoop to buy a house like that these days.
Plenty of people would buy it, depending on the location. Hell, turn it into an apartment on the upper east side of Manhattan and it’s probably worth $1M. The issue is that because the price of land has skyrocketed, no one is building houses that size anywhere near where people actually want to live.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:07 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is the “dream house” that a 1965 auto worker in Michigan was living in
which is almost assuredly unaffordable for someone working on the line of plant today
which is the point in all of these conversations
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:08 pm to Archives
quote:What?
My grandmother's house had 2 bedrooms, one bath, and a window AC unit added much later. No one would stoop to buy a house like that these days.
You put that house in an area that isn’t the ghetto and it would be snatched up immediately.
Anecdotal, but those homes are getting snatched up by companies, torn down, and then massive homes are built on the land. Happening in my neighborhood to all the homes built in the 70s/80s.
Also, why did he choose 1956 as the year to compare? Makes me question whether he has an agenda.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:10 pm to Scruffy
quote:
You put that house in an area that isn’t the ghetto and it would be snatched up immediately. Anecdotal, but those homes are getting snatched up by companies, torn down, and then massive homes are built on the land. Happening in my neighborhood to all the homes built in the 70s/80s.
It’s become very common in Baton Rouge for old houses on decent sized lots to get torn down and replaced by two two-story pseudo-shotguns side by side, taking up the whole lot. Land is just too valuable to let it “go to waste” these days.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:10 pm to Archives
quote:
My grandmother's house had 2 bedrooms, one bath, and a window AC unit added much later.
No one would stoop to buy a house like that these days.
These houses sale in a day for $250k in my neighborhood in fricking Shreveport
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:11 pm to Joshjrn
Specifically where in BR are you referring to?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:12 pm to Joshjrn
quote:Like I said, it’s happening around me too.
It’s become very common in Baton Rouge for old houses on decent sized lots to get torn down and replaced by two two-story pseudo-shotguns side by side, taking up the whole lot. Land is just too valuable to let it “go to waste” these days.
What would make more money? Selling a single 1500 sqft home or tearing it down and building two 2000+ sqft homes on the land, each selling for double the original?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:13 pm to Salmon
quote:yeah now a house like that is purchased by a young professional couple with help form mom and dad, probably
which is almost assuredly unaffordable for someone working on the line of plant today
which is the point in all of these conversations
Posted on 6/1/26 at 8:17 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
Specifically where in BR are you referring to?
Southdowns
Garden District
Old houses are torn down and replaced with farmhouse shiplap monstrosities
Popular
Back to top


19








