- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The largest object in the universe is no longer TON 618
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:29 am to SingleMalt1973
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:29 am to SingleMalt1973
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 4:30 am
0
Posted on 12/17/24 at 5:48 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
luminous, accreting black holesquote:
Sounds nasty.
Nah man. The darker the berry, the sweeter the juice.
This post was edited on 12/17/24 at 5:49 am
Posted on 12/17/24 at 6:05 am to Ghost of Colby
quote:
That’s a wormhole to go down that will blow your mind on the size of some black holes, and that’s just “Supermassive Black Holes” This thing is a “stupendously massive”.
Gonna need to get up to ludicrous speed just to get through it.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 6:37 am to SuperSaint
quote:
one of our LLotOT that post in the Lunch Thrays
Wonder which one SS?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 6:44 am to scrooster
Like anyone could even know that, Napoleon.
This seems like a case of the blind men trying to describe an elephant. "might be 100 billion sons big, maybe more. Who knows. It's also invisible since it's a black hole. But no way my instrument I measure it with is malfunctioning, even a little.
I'm pretty sure about this, so the only reasonable thing to do is hurry to publish my hypothesis. "
This seems like a case of the blind men trying to describe an elephant. "might be 100 billion sons big, maybe more. Who knows. It's also invisible since it's a black hole. But no way my instrument I measure it with is malfunctioning, even a little.
I'm pretty sure about this, so the only reasonable thing to do is hurry to publish my hypothesis. "
Posted on 12/17/24 at 7:14 am to Huck Finn
quote:
I'm pretty sure about this, so the only reasonable thing to do is hurry to publish my hypothesis.
This is a rather solid plan in the scientifical community. Make an outlandish hypothesis about something so immense and bizarre, use big scientastic words like "stupendous" in your dumbed down explanation. If you are proven wrong, it'll be years after you are dead and forgotten.
On a side note, what is with the word "explanation"? if the root is explain, where does the "i" go... Some things just can't be explained with science.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 7:16 am to scrooster
Trust the science
Posted on 12/17/24 at 7:20 am to scrooster
Take this about my lady down....she hasn't gotten her wegovy yet.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 7:21 am to Ghost of Colby
Too early for this much thinking! 
Posted on 12/17/24 at 7:36 am to scrooster
Meh. I'll wait for Phoenix A+
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:07 am to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Everybody knows it’s Lizzo..
STop making fun of Lizzo or shes not coming to Tiger Droppings anymore!!!
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:10 am to scrooster
What does Star Trek and toilet paper have in common?
They search the black hole looking for Clingons.
Sorry, old kids joke seemed appropriate
They search the black hole looking for Clingons.
Sorry, old kids joke seemed appropriate
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:12 am to scrooster
IIRC they created the concept of dark matter because there wasn’t enough mass in the universe to account for some of the movements they were observing. I wonder if they’ve relooked at this given the size and mass of some of these back holes.
I’m of the opinion that if you have to make something up because your math and observations don’t align…then it’s probably the math or observations.
I’m of the opinion that if you have to make something up because your math and observations don’t align…then it’s probably the math or observations.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:13 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
And physicists have absolutely no clue how something can get so large. It’s not from feeding, there isn’t enough time in time itself for something to feed itself to this size.
Given the second law of thermo, it started out more massive. I guess you can take it all the way back to the big bang.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:16 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
I’m of the opinion that if you have to make something up because your math and observations don’t align…then it’s probably the math or observations.
Of course. When astrophysicists say "dark matter", they are admitting their observations are not sufficient and they trust the math.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:19 am to scrooster
Black holes are wormholes to the other side of the universe. On our side we their black holes as dark matter.
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:23 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
And physicists have absolutely no clue how something can get so large. It’s not from feeding, there isn’t enough time in time itself for something to feed itself to this size.
It's pulling mass in from another universe?
Posted on 12/17/24 at 9:00 am to scrooster
quote:
The largest object in the universe is no longer TON 618
Correct....it's one of Waffle House's regulars
Posted on 12/17/24 at 9:04 am to scrooster
The human mind can’t comprehend the size of our sun, much less 100 billion of them. Space is bonkers.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News