- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/4/17 at 9:59 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
quote:
she and her husband took out a personal line of credit to pay her staff.
Can we start an investigation into how she paid back that loan?
To me, this is the most important question not being asked in the middle of this pontificating. So she took out a line of credit to make payroll. How was she paid back? Was there interest paid on her repayment?
It sounds like a great talking point, but mixing g personal finances with the finances of an NPO of which one has no affiliation other than employment can get dicey.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:00 am to Kramer26
quote:
How could the tax be discontinued? Metro Council puts it on the ballot and the people vote to repeal the tax?
That's a possibility. The case is being put together that this organization is corrupt. So the tax will be repealed. Or the organization will be dissolved and the tax will be repealed automatically
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:01 am to Will Cover
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt that she simply acted on the wishes of the elderly woman. Perhaps she didn't see the blatant conflict of interest being the executrix would pose. She could simply resign as executrix, admit the conflict of interest, and develop protocols to prevent this from happening again.
Instead, she took the nuclear option and thinks she did no wrong. That's what makes this a major problem.
Instead, she took the nuclear option and thinks she did no wrong. That's what makes this a major problem.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:01 am to slackster
She may have done this before. Maybe others will come forward if she admits COI
This post was edited on 4/4/17 at 10:04 am
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:02 am to slackster
the nuclear option you are suggesting is better known as the "dindu defense"
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:02 am to upgrayedd
She tries to make it look like she was being magnanimous, but in all reality she probably didn't want to miss payroll because then questions start getting asked and she looks bad for not being able to meet quota, and it invites unwanted scrutiny for people to start digging (and likely finding corruption).
Plus if people stop getting paid they may start blowing whistles.
Plus if people stop getting paid they may start blowing whistles.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:03 am to fr33manator
What would it actually take for this place to have an audit done by the State or outside firm?
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:04 am to slackster
quote:I agree with this.
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt that she simply acted on the wishes of the elderly woman. Perhaps she didn't see the blatant conflict of interest being the executrix would pose. She could simply resign as executrix, admit the conflict of interest, and develop protocols to prevent this from happening again.
Instead, she took the nuclear option and thinks she did no wrong. That's what makes this a major problem.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:04 am to slackster
quote:
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt that she simply acted on the wishes of the elderly woman. Perhaps she didn't see the blatant conflict of interest being the executrix would pose. She could simply resign as executrix, admit the conflict of interest, and develop protocols to prevent this from happening again.
But she's already trying to act like she won't take the money
Let's not give her the benefit of the doubt, because that sum of money is far too much to make that sort of assumption. $500/year, maybe I would allow that. $500/month? frick no. She found a get rich quick scheme, and we caught her in the act. She shouldn't be treated as anything but an unethical thief
Also they would NEVER give a white person the "benefit of the doubt" in this kind of scenario
This post was edited on 4/4/17 at 10:05 am
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:06 am to brbengalgal
quote:
She's probably done this many times. I'm surprised that no others have come forward.
Or, because of their access to the personal lives of the elderly, they know who has family who would know about their finances and who doesn't.
Since many don't have contact with family or they live far away, they can set up these wills (or insurance policies) with the family being none the wiser, thus the questions don't get raised.
Tarsha may not have known that there was another person on the bank account and therefore would be able to stop her crooked scheme.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:08 am to fr33manator
quote:
but in all reality she probably didn't want to miss payroll because then questions start getting asked
Exactly. Like how do you miss payroll at all when you are receiving state funding?
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:10 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
That's my point. You would think Gravy and the SJW's would be on the side of the people that were ripped off. I thought that was their mission in life. Protecting the injustices against the black people of BR.
Well Gravy and MM this is an injustice. Where's the outrage for this poor family?
The SJW definition of "racism" that MM and GC subscribe to is race + power = racism. This definition also applies to their levels of outrage when it comes to defending the actions of certain people. They defend TCA because of her race plus the power (of the purse) that she holds. Unfortunately, the elderly lady, as well as her family, have the race part of the equation but lack any power that will benefit GC and MM. Therefore, they cannot come to the aid of vulnerable citizens because it does not benefit them in any way.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:11 am to slackster
quote:
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt that she simply acted on the wishes of the elderly woman.
That's why I would like to know if there are any other cases where she has been named in wills since she has been with the COA. If this is the only time, then I can easily give her the benefit of the doubt.
Look, we all know that there are always two sides to every story and the truth is usually in the middle of those. Maybe the deceased lady really didn't like her family and said frick it, I'm not giving them shite. That is certainly possible.
But even if she did do that to spite her family, Amar shouldn't have took it because of the blantant conflict it is. Noko needs to do some more digging to see if there are any other elderly people that have named Amar as executor of their wills.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:13 am to SPEEDY
There has to be some kind of Lexis/Nexis style search on probate courts looking for certain names such as Amar's to find this kind of stuff via computer vs by hand.
WBRZ likely had the kinds of subscriptions needed to do this.
WBRZ likely had the kinds of subscriptions needed to do this.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:14 am to upgrayedd
quote:
The SJW definition of "racism" that MM and GC subscribe to is race + power = racism. This definition also applies to their levels of outrage when it comes to defending the actions of certain people. They defend TCA because of her race plus the power (of the purse) that she holds. Unfortunately, the elderly lady, as well as her family, have the race part of the equation but lack any power that will benefit GC and MM. Therefore, they cannot come to the aid of vulnerable citizens because it does not benefit them in any way.
Then maybe ole Gravy and MM should stop quoting the Bible since they can't see which is right and which is wrong
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:15 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Of course TCA says she doesn't want the money now. She's not brain-dead, she's trying to cover her arse and not look corrupt when she's been caught
It shows how clueless she is. She thinks the problem is being compensated when the real problem is acceptint the role in the estate in the first place. Declining the compensation doesn't make it any less of a conflict of interest.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:16 am to OysterPoBoy
You damn well better take out a loan to fill that pig trough. You don't want any of dem other pigs squealing.
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:16 am to Will Cover
I asked in other thread and no answer. Who is her actual boss and how is she paid? Is she paid from taxpayer money, or elderly people's that they service insurance?
Posted on 4/4/17 at 10:17 am to Will Cover
At no point in our altruism are we allowed to steal. Accepting the premise that one helps their fellow man does not license one to then orchestrate a theft . This is the basis of professional ethics. If one feels that good deeds on the one hand somehow cancel out stealing family inheritance from young children, then you forfeit your moral standing to be in a position of leadership. And there is nothing in this case that justifies collecting a fee in perpetuity at the expense of the deceased family and minor grandchildren. Furthermore, if this stands I will personally make it a point to advocate publicly against all involved at every opportunity, including doing everything I can to defund EBRCOA as long as it is administered by a known thief.
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News