Started By
Message

re: State to announce I-10 expansion today

Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:36 am to
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
27561 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:36 am to
Also, the pros exit off before the big merge with 110 then get right back on after a few blocks on the surface streets.

It actually helps congestion and is faster.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76784 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:36 am to
Epic Clusterfrick will ensue
Posted by OneSaintsFan
St. George, La
Member since Jan 2009
1929 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Epic Clusterfrick will ensue


You are right, so let's do nothing and enjoy our current cluster.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3806 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:39 am to
This is stupid. They haven't even applied for the money yet. This is all tied to "if" funding is approved.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76784 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:39 am to
oh no, I'm glad they are doing it. I just know what a cluster frick it will be.
This post was edited on 1/12/18 at 10:27 am
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
39268 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:41 am to
Still waiting on I-49
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
30530 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:42 am to
If it's like I-20 this will be a 25 year project
Posted by Mac
Member since Nov 2007
14810 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:42 am to
quote:

It's going to be a nasty few years but it will be worth it if they do it correctly.

Yea that's going to be horrible
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
22281 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Spend a half billion to put a band aid. Just get the money and build a loop



You do realize that $500M is not going to touch a loop, right?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43085 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:45 am to
quote:

No, Baton Rouge's need for a new bridge or loop doesn't change the fact that I-10 needed to be widened 25 years ago. This would have to happen regardless.


Exactly right.

This project needed to be done whether you build a loop or not.

All interstates in EBR need to be a minimum, of six lanes (3 in each direction). With this project and the one for Highland on East we will be close if not there when completed. There would be no bottlenecks in the parish.

Hopefully the planners can see fit to incorporate a by-pass or a couple of by-passes or even a loop in the mid range plans and get that started using private companies and toll roads.

But this project had to advance and the fact that it took so long is an indication of how politics drives this state instead of practicality.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49697 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:45 am to
quote:


You do realize that $500M is not going to touch a loop, right?



No he doesn’t. He’s a moron.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49100 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:47 am to
quote:

You do realize that $500M is not going to touch a loop, right?


It'll get it started and tolls for 30 years will cover the remaining 5.5b

And those tolls will never go away.
I-30 in DFW and the CCC in NOLA-Westbank are the only two places I've driven that USED to have a toll.
Posted by slinger1317
Northshore
Member since Sep 2005
7135 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:51 am to
quote:

The only location along the interstate's 2,400 miles between Jacksonville, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, where traffic does not share two or more lanes is eastbound just after the Highland Road exit and the foot of the bridge in eyeshot of downtown Baton Rouge.


I wasn't aware of this one lane section. I checked google earth and can't see any place along that stretch that is one lane??
Posted by Jimmy2shoes
The South
Member since Mar 2014
11004 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:51 am to
don't think it will help when its completed in 2085
This post was edited on 1/12/18 at 8:52 am
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43085 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:52 am to
quote:

And it didn't take a gas tax.


When people balked at raising taxes we were told we were doomed. Now this project and a few others are moving forward. Amazing.
Posted by bayou choupique
the banks of bayou choupique
Member since Oct 2014
1848 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:53 am to
so the video said they will get rid of shoulders to make more thru lanes due to right of way constraints....

baw....a loop is the only answer.

and to the poster above who mentioned 500 Million, that will not even pay for one new bridge across the river.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104483 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:54 am to
I-10 goes to one lane in San Antonio, both ways.



They have a loop however, but if you are just taking I-10 through the city, it'll go down to one lane.
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
26450 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:54 am to
Oh it be german alright.

LINK
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43085 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

I wasn't aware of this one lane section. I checked google earth and can't see any place along that stretch that is one lane??


It's one through land with an exit lane on the side of it.

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43085 posts
Posted on 1/12/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

And those tolls will never go away. I-30 in DFW and the CCC in NOLA-Westbank are the only two places I've driven that USED to have a toll.


Have you ever used the Sunshine Bridge?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram