- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So DA George Barnhill had the same video in possession since the day of the Arbery murder
Posted on 5/7/20 at 10:09 pm to Pesticide
Posted on 5/7/20 at 10:09 pm to Pesticide
quote:
I never once saw him point the gun until there was a struggle for it. Therefore my previous statement is true. Not illegal to own a gun or have gun in your possession.
The driver of the vehicle is standing in the opposite lane of traffic with a wide stance. You can’t see how the shotgun was pointed at this point because of the shadow. But his stance indicates he has the shotgun drawn in some fashion that isn’t just sling over his shoulder.
The guy in the back of the truck is on the phone with his left hand and has a pistol in his right that is not holstered.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 10:59 pm to Pesticide
quote:
What video are you watching? Watched that vid frame by frame. It never happened.
0:14
quote:
Again. What video are you watching. The man is on the phone. Once the first shot rang out he put his phone down and picked up his gun off the toolbox.
Watch closely. His right hand never touches the toolbox. He brings it to his left to send the slide forward after his left hand puts the phone down.
Posted on 5/7/20 at 11:41 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
Once rushed by the deceased (hypothetical but corroborated by the DA) could the shooter have feared for his life?
You keep spewing this but there is no other video. That reasoning & explanations for the McMichael's not being charged came from the 2nd D.A., who has already recused himself from this case. Those statements were made before the actual video got leaked. That New York Times article was released April 26th. The video leaked out May 5th. The LEAKED video & this "SECOND" video you keep harping on are the same video.
The quotes you keep citing from George Barnhill are meaningless now since he is no longer on the case. Secondly, his statements along with the ones the McMichael's gave to police don't match up with what is seen on the video. Third, Barnhill looks like a fool claiming that the McMichael's actions fell under Georgia's citizen's arrest law when the law states the citizen's attempting the arrest have to witness A FELONY OCCURRING. The McMichael's (Greg) by their own statements never saw Arbery on or looking around the property in question which means they didn't witness a felony. At the least, Arbery would be guilty of trespass which is only a misdemeanor, NOT A FELONY. Barnhill's own reasoning for not charging the McMichael's was bullshite based off Greg's statement to police after the shooting. All this is why the GBI were able to come in & get arrest warrants for the McMichael's so quickly.
Between the footage of the video & George Barnhill's statements as to what is on the video & his reasoning as to why he didn't arrest the McMichael's, Barnhill looks to huge piece of shite as well. Barnhill is going to have his own legal issues if/when the Feds come to town & start sniffing around this case.
This post was edited on 5/8/20 at 1:03 am
Posted on 5/8/20 at 12:04 am to BigBrod81
quote:
You keep spewing this but there is no other video. That reasoning & explanations for the McMichael's not being charged by him came from the 2nd D.A., who has already recused himself from this case. Those statements were made before the actual video got leaked. That New York Times article was released April 26th. The video leaked out May 5th. The LEAKED video & this "SECOND" video you keep harping on are the same video.
The quotes you keep citing from George Burnhill are meaningless now since he is no longer on the case. Secondly, his statements along with the ones the McMichael's gave to police don't match up with what is seen on the video. Third, Burnhill looks like a fool claiming that the McMichael's actions fell under Georgia's citizen's arrest law when the law states the citizen's attempting the arrest have to witness A FELONY OCCURRING. The McMichael's (Greg) by their own statements never saw Arbery on or looking around the property in question which means they didn't witness a felony. At the least, Arbery would be guilty of trespass which is only a misdemeanor, NOT A FELONY. Burnhill's own reasoning for not charging the McMichael's was bullshite based off Greg's statement to police after the shooting. All this is why the GBI were able to come in so quickly & get arrest warrants for the McMichael's so quickly.
Between the footage of the video & George Burnhill's statements as to what is on the video & his reasoning as to why he didn't arrest the McMichael's, Burnhill looks to huge piece of shite as well. Burnhill is going to have his own legal issues if/when the Feds come to town & start sniffing around this case.
Well since you have cracked the case I guess there is no need for a grand jury and a lynch mob should be assembled immediately.
Get off your high horse of zero doubt and 100% presumption and let the justice system do its job.
The only evidence in the case is not the 30 second video.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 12:18 am to AndyCBR
Have you read the entire police report? I have. I doubt you have.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 12:39 am to BigBrod81
quote:
Have you read the entire police report? I have. I doubt you have.
You'd probably be better off wiping your arse with that police report
Posted on 5/8/20 at 12:46 am to Powerman
quote:
You'd probably be better off wiping your arse with that police report
Both the police report & Barnhill's statements as to why he didn't prosecute are both trash. I'm just saying I've read them while I know the guy I was replying to didn't since he was quoting statements made by Barnhill as fact. Too many inconsistencies between the video & prior statements given by several parties involved in this entire incident.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 1:18 am to Pesticide
quote:
The driver of the vehicle is standing in the opposite lane of traffic with a wide stance
What video are you watching? Watched that vid frame by frame. It never happened.
Lol Wut?

Posted on 5/8/20 at 2:01 am to BigBrod81
quote:
Have you read the entire police report? I have. I doubt you have.
No, does the police report + the 30 second video make up all the evidence in the case?
I imagine there are 911 calls, there are probably eyewitnesses, there may be other video, the statements of the accused are relevant, forensic evidence, etc.
You've already tried the case and the trial hasn't even begun.
My defense of letting the justice system run its course is not de facto support for the shooter.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 7:59 am to AndyCBR
quote:
Actually, yes it is.
Many shootings have been justified or reduced to manslaughter based on the belief that one was "in fear for their life". Whether real or perceived.
This is the standard by which lethal force can be justified.

You are completely wrong.
The standard is "reasonability" - would a reasonable person, under this set of circumstances, fear for their life or fear great bodily harm.
It would be chaos is the law judged every action on perception.
quote:
Does a reasonable person have fear for their life at the time they used lethal force?
Yes, or great bodily harm.
The actual perception of the person seeking the defense in not the standard.
If I have same weird phobia against redheads and I see one walking on the other of the street; I can't just walk over and kill them with immunity even if my sense of fear is real (perceived) to me.
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:33 am to Powerman
quote:
Citizen's arrest is a little bit different than citizen's execution on the spot don't you think?
I lol'd
Posted on 5/8/20 at 8:36 am to Pesticide
You’re bad at watching stuff 

Popular
Back to top
