- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Scott Peterson, The New Evidence”
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:40 pm to Howyouluhdat
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:40 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
The media was on him 24/7. He said he dyed it to hopefully allow him some privacy if I remember correctly. The money he had on him was to pay his sister back for something and the golf course he was going to was in San Diego which is 20 min from the border. He wasn’t trying to flee
Pretty coincidental to have all of those things line up to make it appear he was fleeing. Kind of like how coincidental it was that the 2 bodies just happened to be found near where he went fishing
1
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:46 pm to OU Guy
quote:
After watching this documentary, I have serious questions about the case.
That's what documentaries are designed to do to get views. Cases get mishandled all the time. Some of the perps are still guilty af even with bad procedures see O.J.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:48 pm to OU Guy
Is it just me, or does it seem like at least 90% of the people who the Innocence Project defends are actually guilty?
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 2:58 pm to OU Guy
no need to b/c he's guilty
next
next
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:12 pm to jchamil
quote:
Kind of like how coincidental it was that the 2 bodies just happened to be found near where he went fishing
Bodies are found in the SF bay all the time. It’s not a secret dumping ground and it was 4 months later. Why wouldn’t a guilty person just lie and say he was further away from where he actually was just to cover their tracks? If you are using the fishing trip as a cover it doesn’t make sense to admit that’s where you were if you know there’s a possibility of the bodies being found close to that
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:14 pm to UFFan
quote:
Is it just me, or does it seem like at least 90% of the people who the Innocence Project defends are actually guilty?
Well they have exonerated a lot of people so unlikely. They turn down tons of cases they know they can’t win
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:18 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Why wouldn’t a guilty person just lie and say he was further away from where he actually was just to cover their tracks? If you are using the fishing trip as a cover it doesn’t make sense to admit that’s where you were if you know there’s a possibility of the bodies being found close to that
Because that's where he actually was. Maybe he didn't lie because he thought someone could have seen him and fishing would be a plausible reason to be there; it's easier to keep track of as few lies as possible. He didn't think the bodies would be found most likely.
He has the worst luck of all time if all of these things are truly just coincidental and he's innocent.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:29 pm to jchamil
quote:
Because that's where he actually was. Maybe he didn't lie because he thought someone could have seen him and fishing would be a plausible reason to be there; it's easier to keep track of as few lies as possible. He didn't think the bodies would be found most likely.
So he’s worried about someone seeing him fishing but not moving a dead body from two different locations? Look he may be guilty but if he is he did a damn good job of covering his tracks as far as DNA, fingerprints etc. goes.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:48 pm to Howyouluhdat
quote:
Bodies are found in the SF bay all the time. It’s not a secret dumping ground and it was 4 months later. Why wouldn’t a guilty person just lie and say he was further away from where he actually was just to cover their tracks? If you are using the fishing trip as a cover it doesn’t make sense to admit that’s where you were if you know there’s a possibility of the bodies being found close to that
Probably why he initially told a few people he was golfing and not boating before that lie kind of fell through
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News