re: “Scott Peterson, The New Evidence”

I am not saying he didn't do it. In fact, I think he did. The problem is, he got the death penalty because he was a slime ball that cheated on his pregnant wife, the sweet adorable girl next door. All her friends loved her, she was going to be the best mother, etc etc. All emotional arguments that have nothing to do with whether or not he killed her, or if someone else did. Did he do it? Probably. Was he convicted in the court of public opinion over concrete evidence? Absolutely.

quote:

---

would of had

---

would have had - you need to get better at English

quote:

---

The marina was an hour and a half away from his house.

---

so not impossible - some research I did said Scott said he left at 9:30 to go to the marina, his cell phone pings him as leaving their neighborhood around 10, the dog was put in their backyard by a neighbor around 10:15

So he could’ve abducted Laci himself

quote:

---

Then they should be able to find at least one shred of evidence since they claim he moved her body all over the place. He cooperated from day 1 and got burned for it

---

There’s tons of evidence. You’re looking for CSI proof, which usually only exists on CSI.


You’re never going to get 100% proof. But at the end of the day, Scott is as innocent as OJ is.

quote:

---

I have a hard time believing there’s ‘new’ evidence because he was acting pretty suspicious when he was arrested.

---

Like I said before, if the Innocence Project is on it then theres new evidence

quote:

---

Like I said before, if the Innocence Project is on it then theres new evidence

---

The Innocence Project has nothing to do with his case:

https://innocenceproject.org/news/statement-on-developments-in-the-scott-peterson-case-california/

quote:

---

I am not saying he didn't do it. In fact, I think he did. The problem is, he got the death penalty because he was a slime ball that cheated on his pregnant wife, the sweet adorable girl next door. All her friends loved her, she was going to be the best mother, etc etc. All emotional arguments that have nothing to do with whether or not he killed her, or if someone else did. Did he do it? Probably. Was he convicted in the court of public opinion over concrete evidence? Absolutely.

---

I think this s a good summation. Its that he was tried in public opinion pushed by press to make him a bad guy from day 1. And the prosecutors were negligent in passing anything to defense that might hurt them getting a conviction. Even the notes taken by lead investigator in first 2 days were destroyed.

I expected maybe a few iffy finds by the innocence project but was stunned at so many finds. The problem is he would never get a fair second trial because all the key evidence is gone and the witnesses are 23 years older, which memories fade over time. It needed to happen then and so he’ll never get one. And he’ll stay in jail regardless.

I keep an open mind when credible information is presented. The prosecutor has a sketchy history. And once they fixated on him at start of day 1, they never looked at any other option. They never fully explored witnesses.

I will give a knock to defense. They could have called those witnesses and didn’t. They thought they had proven reasonable doubt. Big mistake.

Another point is trying to use baby weight at time of death. They brought in one lady to testify on how old the baby was at time of death to use trying to pin death timing to 24 Dec. She said the time would range from 23 Dec to mid-Jan and it was impossible to pin a date due to so many variables in last trimester. So prosecutors 4 days later found another man who would say it was 23-24 Dec. That was a dagger. And yet it is very flawed.

Another was using only wind to determine how body got from where he took boat out to where it washed up. Flawed again. Using modern tech the and old current and wind data the body would not have washed up where found.

So many things and with more modern tech you get different results.

He still likely did it but I had no idea how bad the case was and how corrupted the prosecutor was.

quote:

---

The Innocence Project has nothing to do with his case:

---

The LA Innocence Project does and they partnered with top end post conviction lawyers and the CFSI. They do the exact same thing and have to separate entities for funding purposes

quote:

---

doesn’t mean it’s not made up or fabricated

---

Huh, What’s made up? These are witness statements the Modesto PD got and never followed up on any of them. Just stop commenting if you haven’t watched the latest

quote:

---

I never said it was - if the prosecution didn’t do a good job then what does it matter what their theory is?

---

Are you serious? That’s their argument lol. If not then theres reasonable doubt. What are you not getting?

quote:

---

These are witness statements the Modesto PD got and never followed up on any of them.

---

Not all of them - some of the ‘statements’ are new - this is from the LA innocence project website:

quote:

---

the willingness and courage of the witnesses who continue to come forward with information shedding light on what really happened

---

The website also says this:

quote:

---

the bodies were most likely put into the water off the Albany Bulb

---

I don’t think that proves he’s innocent - those places are only a few miles apart

quote:

---

Just stop commenting if you haven’t watched the latest

---

why? Who the hell are you to tell me whether or not to comment on a message board? I haven’t seen the new documentary but there are articles about it and some of the info is in the LA innocence project website
LA Innocence Project

quote:

---

You are just pulling shite out of your arse at this point

---

no - this is from the Modesto newspaper

quote:

---

Officers located people who said they saw her in the park about 10 a.m. Karen Servas, a neighbor, said she spotted the Petersons' golden retriever about 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, his leash attached and muddy. Servas said she returned the dog to its yard, not realizing there might be something amiss. Read more at: LINK

---

Servas later testifies she put the dog in the backyard around 10:18 - whether or not she’s coached to say that - we have no idea

Here is the info about the cell phone:
Cell phone

So that’s where I got my info from, among other sources that you can easily find yourself.