- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist is proud to harass families of children who were killed
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:04 pm to NPComb
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:04 pm to NPComb
1
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:05 pm to TheBaker
quote:
Maybe I shouldn't have used the terms "taken out" earlier. Maybe. Maybe not. But given this dude's invention and the ongoing fuel crisis going on in this country, It can make one scratch his/her head and wonder. Let's see...a deranged white dude drives 200 miles and goes to that very specific store is "support" of:
1) white supremacy
2) ...who uses an AR-15 in a mass shooting
3) ...who coincidently also killed a man who invented a water-ran vehicle
AGAIN, It's just something to think about I'm not gonna go on a long rant claiming this was a guaranteed government plot. But don't think for ONE SECOND that the government isn't capable of electing an unknown "Manchurian candidate" to execute an event like this.
So let me unpack, the conspiracy is, the Biden Administration, that is committed to wanting to move away from fossil fuels, that is now reluctantly but aggressively trying to get oil companies to up their refining capacity and overcharge or expand operations due to the hyper inflation in the energy market we are seeing, is simultaneously trying to kill off through mass shooting events, the very sort of things that could get him out of this bind and also achieve his larger agenda?
The motive alone doesnt add up.
Setting aside there is zero evidence to support this conspiracy
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:06 pm to TheBaker
quote:
He invented a hydrogen engine/vehicle that ran completely off of water.
No, he did not. I found the patent: 9863309
He claimed to have invented a system to provide more efficient small-scale electrolysis of hydrogen, and he claimed that such a system could be installed in an internal combustion vehicle to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions.
Nowhere did he claim that he could run an engine/car completely on water - at least not in his patent application. That would be absurd considering electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen requires at least the same amount of energy input as combustion of said hydrogen.
The novel part of his invention was apparently a method of using sludge generated during electrolysis to improve overall yield/efficiency.
Clearly a smart guy, but he didn’t invent a perpetual motion machine (which is basically what you described).
ETA: Sensational claims like “he invented a car that runs on water!” are how these theories start in the first place. They are also why you get a collective eye roll from anybody with any chemistry or engineering background.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:07 pm to WDE24
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:11 pm to TheBaker
That isn’t what your claim was or, more correctly, the claim of the conspiracy theorists you are parroting.
Post a link of local news recently covering his invention. What you linked is a story telling people who he was as a victim of the mass shooting.
Just be honest and admit you thought the facts pushed by the conspiracy theorists were true and you repeated them without verification.
While at the same time saying this
Post a link of local news recently covering his invention. What you linked is a story telling people who he was as a victim of the mass shooting.
Just be honest and admit you thought the facts pushed by the conspiracy theorists were true and you repeated them without verification.
While at the same time saying this
quote:
It's wrong to assume things that you blindly choose not to believe.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:12 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No you aren’t. You think it’s a credible or plausible scenario. Just say it.
I personally need a little more info to go on before pulling the trigger (no pun intended) on actually believing this (conspiracy) as fact. All I'm saying is it's possible and don't blindly believe the government isn't capable of planning/executing something like this.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:18 pm to TheBaker
People need to do their own research.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:20 pm to dgnx6
Gentlemen Joe is never at fault.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:29 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Every question that's been asked of me in this thread, I have answered (at least once). I can't help it if you're late to the party and just too damn lazy to do the research.
Oh good. You're back, presumably to answer the questions that you avoided for the entire thread.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:33 pm to TheBaker
quote:Unfortunately, on this board, that makes you a commie liberal scum conspiracy theorist.
I personally need a little more info to go on before pulling the trigger (no pun intended) on actually believing this (conspiracy) as fact. All I'm saying is it's possible and don't blindly believe the government isn't capable of planning/executing something like this.
I post on this board because I thought it was different from the nutjobs on the PT. There doesn't seem to be much difference.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:33 pm to lostinbr
quote:
He claimed to have invented a system to provide more efficient small-scale electrolysis of hydrogen, and he claimed that such a system could be installed in an internal combustion vehicle to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions.
Nowhere did he claim that he could run an engine/car completely on water - at least not in his patent application. That would be absurd considering electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen requires at least the same amount of energy input as combustion of said hydrogen.
Let me reiterate. This stuff, while batshit, makes this shooting somewhat interesting.
I ask, again: what makes Sandy Hook so interesting?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:39 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
My insinuations are that the media can't be trusted and that there are very powerful and very evil people among us. Nobody in 9 pages has presented a single bit of "actual evidence" to contradict that. But I am entertained at how you folks stand behind the media as a bastion of truth.
I'm not sure why everyone is giving you such grief over this. Around 600-700,000 babies are aborted in the U.S. every single year by their OWN mothers. That's roughly 2000 babies PER DAY in this country.
Clearly these children have been "sacrificed" for the greater good (career, financial situation, etc.), so why is it such a stretch to think that some of these events may have been orchestrated to push an agenda?
I'm not saying the events didn't happen, I suppose I'm thinking something much worse. There are some sick and twisted folks walking among us, and they may not hesitate to do something like this for the "greater good" so to speak.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:46 pm to HouseMom
quote:This.
I'm not saying the events didn't happen, I suppose I'm thinking something much worse.
When you have sick phuks powerful enough that laws don't apply to them, who knows what kind of pedophilia, "gang" initiation type shite they come up with.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:47 pm to HouseMom
quote:
I'm not sure why everyone is giving you such grief over this. Around 600-700,000 babies are aborted in the U.S. every single year by their OWN mothers. That's roughly 2000 babies PER DAY in this country.
This has nothing to do with the topic at hand
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:48 pm to LNCHBOX
Monkeys might fly out of your arse too.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:51 pm to TX Tiger
They have been planned and carried out????
Please give us examples of this here in the United States.
Please give us examples of this here in the United States.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:51 pm to OldmanBeasley
quote:That kind of naive reaction is how they keep getting away with it.
I'm not sure why everyone is giving you such grief over this. Around 600-700,000 babies are aborted in the U.S. every single year by their OWN mothers. That's roughly 2000 babies PER DAY in this country.
This has nothing to do with the topic at hand
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:54 pm to TX Tiger
Getting away with what?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 12:58 pm to TGFN57
quote:And yet another question already been answered.
They have been planned and carried out????
Please give us examples of this here in the United States.
Google CIA planned false flags (2.33 MILLION results)
Posted on 6/15/22 at 1:06 pm to TX Tiger
Has there been one on US soil verified since Operation Northwoods? I think the CIA has operated in this realm mostly overseas since then.
The FBI has certainly had some shady shenanigans in its sordid history. I don’t know of a false flag type mass shoot if though. I do think they were heavily involved in the assassination a of Malcom X and Fred Hampton though as part of Cointelpro.
The FBI has certainly had some shady shenanigans in its sordid history. I don’t know of a false flag type mass shoot if though. I do think they were heavily involved in the assassination a of Malcom X and Fred Hampton though as part of Cointelpro.
Page 11 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News