Prehistoric women were probably better at hunting than men, scientists suggest

“We can just say that male physiology is female thanks to modern trans theory; therefore, it was women all along who were the superior physical sex.

I'm not sure how that translates to actually taking an animal?

quote:

---

The wider hips of a woman also are an advantage, a physiological study published in American Anthropologist found. Likely an adaptation to aid in childbirth,

---

Genius

This “scientific” article is complete bullshite, High C suggests.

quote:

---

The female hormone, she says, is “really the unsung hero” as it better modulates how quickly a person burns their energy reserves and delays fatigue.

---

quote:

---

she says

---

Ya don't say

Women were able to lure animals to them using the scent of their period blood.

quote:

---

I  guess we will find out when it eventually cracks off one day and men have to put women back in their place.

---

This is what people don't understand. Equality, in all of its forms, is a legal fiction that only exists due to civilized society. Once that thin veneer wears off, its back to survival of the fittest.

quote:

---

Women have a metabolism better suited to endurance, according to Dr Cara Ocobock, director of the Human Energetics Laboratory at the University of Notre Dame.

‘Going for the kill’
“[This] would have been critical in early hunting because they would have had to run the animals down into exhaustion before actually going in for the kill,” she said.

---

What a stupid fricking conclusion.

They may have a hormone that gives them a metabolism suited better to endurance, but men still have better endurance overall so who gives a shite.