
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Plane crash in Palm Beach County today
Posted on 11/3/26 at 1:37 pm to MaxxPain2
Posted on 11/3/26 at 1:37 pm to MaxxPain2
quote:
Disagree....few years ago we were flying into Eagle Ridge airport near Beaver Creek Colorado, and it was windy and turbulent as frick as we started our descent. Female pilot gets on intercom and says tower told her that the window of opportunity to land was closing and we had to get on ground asap. She told us it was going take some aggressive maneuvering so buckle up and get ready. The steep angles and precision she displayed in fricking awful conditions was on point. She was standing in front of the cockpit when we were deplaning, and I fist bumped her and told her she was a complete bad arse.
yeah. there's a huge difference between saying women shouldnt be flying and saying that women should be given artifically increased opportunities just because they are women. i think men generally speaking have a more natural inclination for things like flying planes, but there are plenty men that i wouldnt trust with a powerwheel. similarly, i know many female pilots who have done well. i also know many females who probably shouldnt even be allowed to drive motorvehicles.
this is one of the biggest problems with DEI is that it casts doubt on the abilities of people who genuinely ARE good at their jobs and earned it.
but blanket statements like "women shouldnt be flying" is stupid and obviously incorrect.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 1:42 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 11/3/26 at 1:50 pm to baldona
quote:
Am I crazy to feel like 600-700 ft altitude change for turbulence seems EXTREME and not something 99% of Charters would want to experience?
Not crazy, IMHO.
Think it through. When your Lear 60 is in turbulence that pushes and pulls it 800 feet up or down, you are not in control of your jet for those moments. It is out of control. 800 feet is just over 266 yards. That is a huge distance to be bounced up and down and not in control of your jet.
If you manage to somehow retrieve the situation and get back in control of your jet, you should consider yourself fortunate, because that sometimes does not happen. Being bounced around for 266 yards up and down is really upsetting and you might not get back into control.
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 11/3/26 at 1:52 pm to Champagne
quote:
. Being bounced around for 266 yards up and down is really upsetting and you might not get back into contro
why Juan Brown was promoting the Upset Recovery school at the end of his video.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:02 pm to MaxxPain2
quote:
we were flying into Eagle Ridge airport near Beaver Creek Colorado, and it was windy and turbulent as frick as we started our descent. Female pilot gets on intercom and says tower told her that the window of opportunity to land was closing and we had to get on ground asap.
Is the co-pilot not the one on the coms?
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:10 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Never heard of this until today. That's scary. I was wondering why a fast moving plane couldn't just level off. I know so little about flight/planes.
ended up in mach tuck
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:10 pm to baldona
Media briefing day 2 happening now. They’ve found the left elevator in 3 pieces a mile or so from the crash site.
ETA: they’re going into the crater tomorrow most likely.
ETA: they’re going into the crater tomorrow most likely.
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:16 pm to jlovel7
quote:
They’ve found the left elevator in 3 pieces a mile or so from the crash site.
1.3 to 3.8 miles from crash site
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:19 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I was wondering why a fast moving plane couldn't just level off
A wing keeps a jet in the air because the wing creates a low pressure area above the wing that yields to a higher pressure area under the wing.
But the particular conditions that maintains this condition of higher pressure lifting up the wing are destroyed when some wings are passing through the atmosphere at too high a speed that approaches Mach 1. When that happens, the point in space lifting up on the wing moves out of place. When it moves far out of place to a point where the higher pressure uplift is no longer even on the wing - it has moved behind the wing and is pushing up into nothing.
The wing no longer has lift. The speed of Mach Tuck condition removed the uplift capability of the wing, and there's no way to slow back down to regain the proper uplift position.
The Lear 60 is a jet that is well-known to be subject to overspeed and Mach Tuck problems. It's a tricky jet and I would not fly one.
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:19 pm to MaxxPain2
quote:
She was standing in front of the cockpit when we were deplaning, and I fist bumped her and told her she was a complete bad arse.
Nice. I’m sure you also probably yelled “OH YEAH GIRL POWER BABY” to her on the way out.
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:26 pm to Ziggy
I think a few things need to happen. Modernization of aging aircraft in the skies and ballistic parachutes where applicable.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:31 pm to Champagne
one thing is for sure, 99.9% of us (myself included) never heard the term mach tuck before yesterday, and today we're all experts 
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:34 pm to Ziggy
quote:
1.3 to 3.8 miles from crash site
Sigh.
quote:
Ziggy
Next family reunion that we have, I'm not likely to speak to you.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:40 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
i think men generally speaking have a more natural inclination for things like flying planes, but there are plenty men that i wouldnt trust with a powerwheel. similarly, i know many female pilots who have done well. i also know many females who probably shouldnt even be allowed to drive motorvehicles.
this is one of the biggest problems with DEI is that it casts doubt on the abilities of people who genuinely ARE good at their jobs and earned it.
As much as many people refuse to admit it there are ingrained characteristics of men and women that naturally make them suited for different things.
From AI, but here are a few that would apply for pilots:
quote:
Navigational Strategies
• Men's Tendency: More often rely on abstract, global, or Euclidean metrics like cardinal directions (north, south, east, west) and overall 3D geometric layout.
• Women's Tendency: More often rely on local landmarks (such as buildings, signs, or distinct features) and sequential, memorized routes
quote:
Mental Rotation: On average, men tend to score higher on tests requiring the mental rotation of 3D objects or shapes. This gap is one of the more consistent statistical differences in cognitive testing.
quote:
Brain Activity and Processing Styles
• Action vs. Introspection: Under acute pressure, imaging studies show that the male amygdala (the brain's emotional hub) often connects more strongly to motor and action-oriented regions of the brain, pushing toward physical or problem-focused fixes.
• Internalization and Ruminating: The female brain under stress frequently activates regions tied to emotional regulation, social cognition, and self-reflection. This can lead to deeper cognitive processing, planning, or rumination, which helps women evaluate complex interpersonal stakes but also increases vulnerability to anxiety and depression.
• Locus Coeruleus: The brain's alertness center (locus coeruleus) contains more stress-neurotransmitter receptors and clears chemicals slower in females, making women experience certain stress inputs with greater intensity.
quote:
Grey Matter Dominance: Male processing tends to pull significantly from grey matter, the localized blocks of tissue where actual computation and action-oriented decisions occur. This favors a deep, hyper-focused "tunnel vision" approach. In a complex scenario, a grey-matter-dominant approach is more likely to break down the situation by triaging inputs sequentially rather than absorbing them all at once.
This post was edited on 11/3/26 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:48 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
What if the government gives you a tax benefit for hiring women if minorities?
The Federal government nor any state gives businesses tax breaks for hiring solely based on gender . Now maybe if she was a single mother or returning to work from prison....but she was not.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 2:50 pm to Champagne
Yeah, I googled it. Totally new concept for me.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 3:19 pm to Champagne
quote:
higher pressure uplift is no longer even on the wing - it has moved behind the wing and is pushing up into nothing.
That's not good.
quote:
The wing no longer has lift
Also not good.
quote:
It's a tricky jet and I would not fly one
Nor would I. But then parallel parking is rough for me.
Posted on 11/3/26 at 3:31 pm to MaxxPain2
quote:
She was standing in front of the cockpit when we were deplaning, and I fist bumped her and told her she was a complete bad arse.
Was this before or after the Pat Benatar song broke out and the whole plane erupted in applause?
Posted on 11/3/26 at 3:39 pm to JudgeHolden
For those ripping the co-pilot, this from a professional pilot:
For non-pilots, RHS is Right Hand Seat. The PIC or Pilot in Command is in left seat (LHS).
quote:
I’ve been flying professionally for 30 years, and that girl did a much better job than anyone has the right to expect from a 20 year old kid. She’s a credit to her instructors, and her training, and she would be more than welcome to sit in the RHS of any jet I was captain of. If it were only possible.
For non-pilots, RHS is Right Hand Seat. The PIC or Pilot in Command is in left seat (LHS).
Posted on 11/3/26 at 3:39 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Careful, scientific facts are apparently sexist to most of the OT users on here

Popular
Back to top



1








