Started By
Message
locked post

Pitt researchers develop weed breathalyzer.

Posted on 9/6/19 at 12:40 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106050 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 12:40 am
Your time has come, potheads. LINK

quote:

PITTSBURGH (Aug. 27, 2019) — As recreational marijuana legalization becomes more widespread throughout the U.S., so has concern about what that means for enforcing DUI laws. Unlike a breathalyzer used to detect alcohol, police do not have a device that can be used in the field to determine if a driver is under the influence of marijuana. New research from the University of Pittsburgh is poised to change that. 
An interdisciplinary team from the Department of Chemistry and the Swanson School of Engineering has developed a breathalyzer device that can measure the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound in marijuana, in the user’s breath. Current drug testing methods rely on blood, urine or hair samples and therefore cannot be done in the field. They also only reveal that the user has recently inhaled the drug, not that they are currently under the influence.
The breathalyzer was developed using carbon nanotubes, tiny tubes of carbon 100,000 times smaller than a human hair. The THC molecule, along with other molecules in the breath, bind to the surface of the nanotubes and change their electrical properties. The speed at which the electrical currents recover then signals whether THC is present. Nanotechnology sensors can detect THC at levels comparable to or better than mass spectrometry, which is considered the gold standard for THC detection. 
“The semiconductor carbon nanotubes that we are using weren’t available even a few years ago,” says Sean Hwang, lead author on the paper and a doctoral candidate in chemistry at Pitt. “We used machine learning to ‘teach’ the breathalyzer to recognize the presence of THC based on the electrical currents recovery time, even when there are other substances, like alcohol, present in the breath.”
Hwang works in the Star Lab, led by Alexander Star, PhD, professor of chemistry with a secondary appointment in bioengineering. The group partnered with Ervin Sejdic, PhD, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, to develop the prototype. 
“Creating a prototype that would work in the field was a crucial step in making this technology applicable,” says Dr. Sejdic. “It took a cross-disciplinary team to turn this idea into a usable device that’s vital for keeping the roads safe.” 
The prototype looks similar to a breathalyzer for alcohol, with a plastic casing, protruding mouthpiece, and digital display. It was tested in the lab and was shown to be able to detect the THC in a breath sample that also contained components like carbon dioxide, water, ethanol, methanol, and acetone. The researchers will continue to test the prototype but hope it will soon move to manufacturing and be available for use.
“In legal states, you’ll see road signs that say “Drive High, Get a DUI,’ but there has not been a reliable and practical way to enforce that,” says Dr. Star. “There are debates in the legal community about what levels of THC would amount to a DUI, but creating such a device is an important first step toward making sure people don’t partake and drive.” 
The paper detailing this research, “Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Detection using Semiconductor-enriched Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Chemiresistors,” (DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00762) was published in the journal ACS Sensors and was coauthored by Sean Hwang, Long Bian, David White, Seth Burkert, Raymond Euler, Brett Sopher, Miranda Vinay and Alexander Star, from the Department of Chemistry, and Nicholas Franconi, Michael Rothfuss, Kara Bocan, and Ervin Sejdic, from the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 



Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64665 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 12:43 am to
Sounds like this only detects smokers and not those who may ingest edibles.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38504 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 12:44 am to
Finally

Can't wait for the checkpoints. to our law enforcement. ( only to those with a designated driver of course)
This post was edited on 9/6/19 at 12:45 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62706 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 1:07 am to
quote:

They also only reveal that the user has recently inhaled the drug, not that they are currently under the influence.
Posted by PrimetimeDaBoss
Swag City, USA
Member since Oct 2008
7144 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 2:10 am to
fricking nerds
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
12124 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 2:43 am to
Thc stays in your urine/blood for up to 30 days and saliva up to 4. I think you can figure out the rest.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135030 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 2:46 am to
quote:

Thc stays in your urine/blood for up to 30 days and saliva up to 4. I think you can figure out the rest.



I think it’s silly that you could go to a state where it’s legal, enjoy it legally, then come back home and a month later lose your job.

Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21403 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 3:40 am to
quote:

Thc stays in your urine/blood for up to 30 days and saliva up to 4.

Thc has a relatively short half life. What you speak of are thc metabolites. While similar, 2 very different things.
Posted by lsuoilengr
Member since Aug 2008
5473 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 4:06 am to
Big problem for the oilfield in Canada. They all like their pot up there. Companies will have to abscond
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
20395 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 4:54 am to
quote:

Sean Hwang, Long Bian, David White, Seth Burkert, Raymond Euler, Brett Sopher, Miranda Vinay and Alexander Star, from the Department of Chemistry, and Nicholas Franconi, Michael Rothfuss, Kara Bocan, and Ervin Sejdic, from the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 


Fixing to be some rich mofos. Law enforcement agencies can see the dollar signs from this tech and will pay handsomely to get it.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11577 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 5:22 am to
Awesome. Even less of a reason to continue criminalizing weed.
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 5:47 am to
OUTSTANDING.
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:00 am to
quote:

I think it’s silly that you could go to a state where it’s legal, enjoy it legally, then come back home and a month later lose your job.


Totally unrelated. Companies have the right to know if they're employees are potheads whether it's illegal or not. If they don't want stoners working for them they shouldn't have to keep paying them.

Similarly, if you don't want to work for a company that doesn't want stoners, you are free to find one that doesn't drug test. Freedom works both ways.
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:03 am to
THC doesn't stay in your system for a month. THC metabolites can be in your system, not active THC. You CAN'T GET HIGH on metabolites.
Posted by Mad Dogg
LA
Member since Sep 2016
4234 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:06 am to
This should be the only way my employer can test for marijuana.
Posted by GhostofRicht
Member since Sep 2019
62 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:17 am to
quote:

I think it’s silly that you could go to a state where it’s legal, enjoy it legally, then come back home and a month later lose your job.

That is why you poors need to get a job where they don't drug test. Not a hard concept to understand. I haven't been drug tested for a job in 10+ years.
Posted by LeroyBrown
South Side Of Chicago
Member since Jul 2017
588 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:20 am to
bastards

Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26748 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:24 am to
frick them
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:27 am to
quote:

Totally unrelated. Companies have the right to know if they're employees are alcoholics whether it's illegal or not. If they don't want drunks working for them they shouldn't have to keep paying them.


See how dumb you sound?
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49099 posts
Posted on 9/6/19 at 6:27 am to
quote:

I think it’s silly that you could go to a state where it’s legal, enjoy it legally, then come back home and a month later lose your job.



I was in Denver with a friend in January visiting another friend. I really would have enjoyed edibles the entire time and flight home like my buddy did.
But he owns his own company.


That same buddy is in Austin now waiting on us to get there. They'll all be giddy on edibles and I'll be sippin ma vodka and beer tomorrow on GameDay. FML
This post was edited on 9/6/19 at 6:28 am
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram