Started By
Message
locked post

Pfizer Documents Reveal they Had ‘Evidence’ Suggesting ‘Increased Risk of myocarditis

Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:41 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:41 am
LINK

quote:

"“There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

“Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (from Pfizer or Moderna), and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose.”








Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
39958 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:42 am to
Well, Big 10 can’t play football now
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55490 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:43 am to
Full documents here

quote:

• “There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”
• “Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (from Pfizer or Moderna), and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose.” [PAGE 19]
• “The reasons for male predominance in myocarditis and pericarditis incidence post COVID-19 vaccination remain unknown.” [PAGE 28]
• “The pattern of cases conform, as per the label, to a pattern of myocarditis cases occurring in majority of young males below 29 years of age within the first two weeks postvaccination...” [PAGE 19]
• “Since April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), particularly in adolescents and young adults (CDC 2021).” [PAGE 18]
• “Myocarditis events were defined as encounters with a billing or encounter diagnosis consistent with an ICD10-CM or SNOMED CT code for myocarditis which fell within two weeks of receiving dose 1, 2, or 3 of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.”
• “Incidence rates of myocarditis were measured for each vaccine dose with denominator signifying the total number of patients receiving that dose and numerator signifying the total number of patients meeting the above criteria for an encounter for myocarditis following that dose.”
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
45634 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:43 am to
People need to be in jail.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14039 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Well, Big 10 can’t play football now


Did they really ever play though?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104494 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:44 am to
Umm, this is just Pfizer talking about what was already public information. Yeh they knew, they are quoting studies and published information
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
13346 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

"There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”


You know what else has this? Covid
It is weird that the vaccine didnt actually contain sars-cov-2 virus but it created the same side effect
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47825 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:45 am to
sounds like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Google need to band together to censor this incredibly harmful information
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4770 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:46 am to
Good thing they had immunity from lawsuits well before they realized this could happen. What a coincidence.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104494 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:46 am to
I mean this is also from 2022

Where exactly do y’all think this was “buried”

CDC publishing reports on potential myocarditis side effect back in 2022….
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:47 am
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47825 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:48 am to
I’m not opposed to vaccination.

I just take any and every opportunity to shite on the aforementioned websites for their censorship policies, especially circa 2021-2022
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17337 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to
I wonder how many will read the non-highlighted text?

1/1000?
Posted by St Stooge
Member since Feb 2017
370 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to
This is literally listed as a potential side effect in the vaccine’s information sheet. Lay off the Qanon conspiracy theories.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
34935 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to
Of course they knew

I remember reading a trial participants experience and the person woke up with the shakes so hard they chipped a tooth

They just buried the side effect information and trotted out the “muh 95% effective” line that also had no basis

Scientific study integrity tossed on the ground like a banana peel

They should be hung from the highest trees for the birds to feast on
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104494 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to
In the leaked document “bombshell”, they literally cite the public studies the data came from acting like this report is anything is absolutely ridiculous, even for this site
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104494 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

They just buried
This document is simply Pfizer quoting and documenting public studies What was buried?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69307 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

People need to be in jail.


No. This is more like it…



Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
4518 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Where exactly do y’all think this was “buried”


It was buried while everyone was being bullied and threatened and mandated into taking the vaccine. You jackass.
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am
Posted by TheLSUriot
Clear Lake, TX
Member since Oct 2007
1542 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am to
quote:

It is weird that the vaccine didnt actually contain sars-cov-2 virus
You are right but don't even know why. The mRNA vaccine produced a product even worse. Whole mRNA and fragments translocating from the injection site and leading to localized and systemic production of modified spike protein products was harmful in ways not fully understood yet.
At least that is my educated scientific guess.

*edited for spelling
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:55 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104494 posts
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am to
quote:

It was buried
The studies in that document were all published at the time they were done, in 2021 and 2022. They weren’t buried at all

This website was posting about then as well.
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram