- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Pfizer Documents Reveal they Had ‘Evidence’ Suggesting ‘Increased Risk of myocarditis
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:41 am
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:41 am
LINK

quote:
"“There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”
“Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (from Pfizer or Moderna), and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose.”
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:42 am to BugAC
Well, Big 10 can’t play football now
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:43 am to BugAC
Full documents here
quote:
• “There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”
• “Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (from Pfizer or Moderna), and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose.” [PAGE 19]
• “The reasons for male predominance in myocarditis and pericarditis incidence post COVID-19 vaccination remain unknown.” [PAGE 28]
• “The pattern of cases conform, as per the label, to a pattern of myocarditis cases occurring in majority of young males below 29 years of age within the first two weeks postvaccination...” [PAGE 19]
• “Since April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), particularly in adolescents and young adults (CDC 2021).” [PAGE 18]
• “Myocarditis events were defined as encounters with a billing or encounter diagnosis consistent with an ICD10-CM or SNOMED CT code for myocarditis which fell within two weeks of receiving dose 1, 2, or 3 of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.”
• “Incidence rates of myocarditis were measured for each vaccine dose with denominator signifying the total number of patients receiving that dose and numerator signifying the total number of patients meeting the above criteria for an encounter for myocarditis following that dose.”
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:43 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Well, Big 10 can’t play football now
Did they really ever play though?
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:44 am to TDsngumbo
Umm, this is just Pfizer talking about what was already public information. Yeh they knew, they are quoting studies and published information
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:44 am to BugAC
quote:
"There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”
You know what else has this? Covid

It is weird that the vaccine didnt actually contain sars-cov-2 virus but it created the same side effect
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:45 am to BugAC
sounds like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Google need to band together to censor this incredibly harmful information
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:46 am to TDsngumbo
Good thing they had immunity from lawsuits well before they realized this could happen. What a coincidence.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:46 am to Ross
I mean this is also from 2022
Where exactly do y’all think this was “buried”
CDC publishing reports on potential myocarditis side effect back in 2022….
Where exactly do y’all think this was “buried”
CDC publishing reports on potential myocarditis side effect back in 2022….
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:47 am
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:48 am to lsupride87
I’m not opposed to vaccination.
I just take any and every opportunity to shite on the aforementioned websites for their censorship policies, especially circa 2021-2022
I just take any and every opportunity to shite on the aforementioned websites for their censorship policies, especially circa 2021-2022
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to BugAC
I wonder how many will read the non-highlighted text?
1/1000?
1/1000?
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to BugAC
This is literally listed as a potential side effect in the vaccine’s information sheet. Lay off the Qanon conspiracy theories.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to BugAC
Of course they knew
I remember reading a trial participants experience and the person woke up with the shakes so hard they chipped a tooth
They just buried the side effect information and trotted out the “muh 95% effective” line that also had no basis
Scientific study integrity tossed on the ground like a banana peel
They should be hung from the highest trees for the birds to feast on
I remember reading a trial participants experience and the person woke up with the shakes so hard they chipped a tooth
They just buried the side effect information and trotted out the “muh 95% effective” line that also had no basis
Scientific study integrity tossed on the ground like a banana peel
They should be hung from the highest trees for the birds to feast on
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:50 am to Ross
In the leaked document “bombshell”, they literally cite the public studies the data came from
acting like this report is anything is absolutely ridiculous, even for this site

Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to Lawyered
quote:This document is simply Pfizer quoting and documenting public studies
They just buried

Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
People need to be in jail.
No. This is more like it…

Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:51 am to lsupride87
quote:
Where exactly do y’all think this was “buried”
It was buried while everyone was being bullied and threatened and mandated into taking the vaccine. You jackass.
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am to Corinthians420
quote:You are right but don't even know why. The mRNA vaccine produced a product even worse. Whole mRNA and fragments translocating from the injection site and leading to localized and systemic production of modified spike protein products was harmful in ways not fully understood yet.
It is weird that the vaccine didnt actually contain sars-cov-2 virus
At least that is my educated scientific guess.

*edited for spelling
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:55 am
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:52 am to Earnest_P
quote:
It was buried

This website was posting about then as well.
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 10:53 am
Popular
Back to top
