- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paying poor men to get snipped?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:45 am to fareplay
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:45 am to fareplay
quote:
Probably cheaper for the tax payers in long term.
So would implementing Sir Francis Galton's ideas, which you are skirting around the margins of. As the sage, Mike Ehrmantraut said: "No more half measures."
0
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:16 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'd pay to have your thread starting privileges snipped.
We have a pool on what kind of car he's not going to buy next.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:03 pm to fareplay
We should have been doing this for years. It removes the weakest from the gene pool. But based on the down votes I guess everyone prefers a society full of retards and paying endless taxes for their welfare.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:14 pm to fareplay
Women who are taking government handouts should be on Norplant the whole time. Responsible young adults should be offered incentives to procreate.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:18 pm to WhiskeyThrottle
quote:Medicaid used to cover it post pregnancy for low income women and now they do not. Sterilization should not be cost prohibitive for people who want it. Even incentivizing it is cheaper than government support for children.
I do believe that people who do not want kids, should have an avenue to get sterilized at an extremely small cost.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:33 pm to fareplay
quote:
I see a lot of baby mama drama videos where they don’t want to be a part of their children’s lives.
lol! Where you come across this crap? Maury Povich?
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:44 pm to LNCHBOX
Where do I chip in?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 1:56 pm to fareplay
quote:
Wouldn’t it be more feasible for govt to just give $1k to a willing man to get snipped? Free of charge +1k to buy weed or whatever.
I say give them $5k to make it more enticing. There are a lot of dudes, especially brothers who have a lot of kids. I ran into a black dude I graduated with awhile back. We were talking and he had his little boy with him, He told me it was his youngest, I asked how many he had.. Dude told me 9. 4 different women. He wasn't married.
Now I don't care whether someone is married or not, but that's probably 4 different women, lets assume at least two of them has other kids for other dudes. Lets assume 3 or the 4 are on welfare.
If 9 kids end up having an average of 2 kids each, that's 18 kids. And well, you get the point.
I also personally think we have too many people on earth. 8.2 billion. Overall, people are having less children and I saw that the population is supposed to max out at 10.2 billion people and is then projected to decrease. A good number would probably be 4-5 billion people.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:03 pm to fareplay
I remember reading an article about 20 years ago about a group project Prevention doing this.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:10 pm to fareplay
quote:
Probably cheaper for the tax payers in long term.
Not if the ratchets are hoes. You could snip 90% of the dudes and 80% of the women would still get pregnant.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:34 pm to Dawgfanman
If on welfare and capable of working but won’t…snip snip
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:38 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Wouldn’t it be more efficient to pay women to get their tubes tied?
Or, If you want any kind of public assistance for your child, come get snipped, before 2 children require funds.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:42 pm to Piebald Panther
My cousin's S-I-L had a surprise baby many years after her hubs got snipped and yes it was his.
And yes they followed protocol.
This was many, many years ago... in the early 70s maybe? Maybe snip jobs are more reliable now.
And yes they followed protocol.
This was many, many years ago... in the early 70s maybe? Maybe snip jobs are more reliable now.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 2:43 pm to fareplay
quote:
Wouldn’t it be more feasible for govt to just give $1k to a willing man to get snipped? Free of charge +1k to buy weed or whatever.
Pay them $10k, $100k, whatever. Virtually no amount of money is too much. Pay the women too.
I've gone from being anti-abortion, to being for free abortion and sterilization clinics on every street corner.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 3:53 pm to fareplay
Sure. No problem tax dollars paying. Cheaper than lifelong welfare benefits for offspring.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:37 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Wouldn’t it be more efficient to pay women to get their tubes tied?
i'm fine with both
Posted on 8/13/25 at 10:06 am to fareplay
Make it like $20k for any unmarried man 18 or older.
Posted on 8/13/25 at 10:14 am to fareplay
New babies in developed countries like USA are declining at the same time that immigration is being restricted, so it is unlikely your suggestion would be adopted .
Posted on 8/13/25 at 11:02 am to vistajay
doesn’t have to be black and white. it would likely help the declining birth rate numbers if you actually incentivized married citizens with jobs to have children. just an idea tho, call me crazy.
Posted on 8/13/25 at 11:22 am to fareplay
quote:
I see a lot of baby mama drama videos where they don’t want to be a part of their children’s lives. Totally get it, don’t want kids. Wouldn’t it be more feasible for govt to just give $1k to a willing man to get snipped? Free of charge +1k to buy weed or whatever.
Why do men have to face sterilization? It is women who are receiving all the gov't aid.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News