Started By
Message

re: Old man rant - the new “low watt” light bulbs suck

Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142188 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

the AC is rectified to DC
and if you've ever been rectified, you know how painful that can be
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54479 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

That is a much bigger issue with incandescent bulbs. LEDs can handle being cycled on and off several hundred times a second without issue. That is how they "dim".

This hasn't proven true in practice for me. I mentioned in the above post that I have an LED bulb that has been burning for at least 7 years without a problem, having never been turned off. The others from that box have been long gone, and the comparison wasn't even close.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16606 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

LEDs can handle being cycled on and off several hundred times a second without issue. That is how they "dim".


That's how they make "noise" in circuits and simply being hooked up to 60 Hz AC that is already turning them on and off 60 times/second is detrimental to their durability. That's why they need extra circuitry to fix their flickering and not cause headaches. Dimmable LEDs are even worse which is why the best ones are not dimmable.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11967 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Only during the senior citizen swinger parties!


quote:

77-year-old-man illegally obtained US$2K worth of erectile drugs and intended to sell them in retirement community: police


Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28710 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

If you're connected to the grid and worried about it from a cost standpoint, why? You might save 100 bucks over the course of your life living to 80 plus years old.
Quick math:

A typical 60 watt incandescent minus an equivalent 10 watt LED is 50 watts of wasted power. Times 2 hours per day is 100 watt-hours. Times 365 days per year is 36.5 kWh. Times ~15 cents/kWh is ~$5.50. Times, let's say, 40 more years of life is $220.

Per bulb.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
30190 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:31 pm to
Thanks. I’m just here to have a good time.
Posted by num1lsufan
Meraux
Member since Feb 2004
1208 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:37 pm to
I’ve had a house full of LED bulbs & might’ve changed 2 in 15 years.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:38 pm to
Agree 1000% cost 10 times as much though
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25727 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

That's how they make "noise" in circuits and simply being hooked up to 60 Hz AC that is already turning them on and off 60 times/second is detrimental to their durability.


I am not 100% sure I understand what you are saying. LEDs are not significantly impacted by strobing them. LEDs are used in many functions where they strobe constantly. One example many people have in their homes is a LED backlit TV. There is no negative effect on LEDs with turning them off and on like incandescent bulbs. That is why they work so well in some many applications.

quote:

That's why they need extra circuitry to fix their flickering and not cause headaches.


The need extra circuitry to function and not just to reduce flicker. The need DC current. They will first need a bucking transformer, then a 4-diode bridge rectifier, then a capacitor for the filter circuit, and a regulation circuit to produce stable voltage you still have a bit of a saw tooth wave (all positive polarity) after the filter portion of the driver circuit. This is all you need for some LED applications but in others, you will need a pulse width modulation circuit to strobe the LED for variable light output. This is a VERY simple circuit and I imagine most LED drivers in bulbs use a constant current source circuit with a couple of transistors, a couple of resistors, a diode (maybe), and a PWM controller (if they are dimmable).

Some people are more prone to flicker induced headaches than others. The problem is low frequency non-visible. The old tar ballast fluorescent bulbs flickered at 120hz which is apparently right in the sweet spot to cause certain people headaches. LED drivers almost always have flicker designed into them but a well-designed one will use much higher frequency flicker. If it is dimmable it should be designed so the lowest frequency output is higher than what is known to trigger headaches. Again the high frequency on-off cycling does not effect longevity in LEDs.



As I was typing this it struck me it would be interesting to wire a house with a single bucking transformer at the load center and run all the lighting circuits from it. It would be more energy efficient, reduce the part count/cost in the individual bulbs, reduce the heat in the bulbs by taking out the primary heat producer which should increase longevity, and potentially reduce the cost of wiring by using smaller gauge wire but might not always be the case since lighting circuits would have to be independent of all the 120v circuits for everything else. The problem with this is it would complicate wiring in the walls/ceiling since the low and high-voltage wires have to be separated to meet NEC and you would have to have separate boxes for switches where you had ceiling fan and light switches again due to the required separation of hi and low voltage.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164288 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Govt shouldn’t be dictating what type of lightbulbs we can have, how much water we can use to flush

Trump fixed this after Obama screwed up light bulbs and shower heads but Biden went back to the garbage regulations.

With Trump being a hotel guy it was funny how he harped on how light bulbs and shower heads suck during 2016. Of all the bluster it was one of the things you could tell he had a lot of experience in dealing with.
This post was edited on 11/15/23 at 11:12 pm
Posted by LSUGUMBO
Shreveport, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8529 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

These piece of shite bulbs do not last 10x longer than the incandescent bulbs.


I replaced all of our van lights with LED in 2018. In the last 6 months, I’ve replaced 4/6 LED cans in our kitchen, and another just went out. Of course, the previous brand has been discontinued, so I’ve been putting it off so I don’t have either 1 light that’s a different color/brightness than the rest or the trim plate looks different the others.

They are/were ‘only’ about $15 per fixture, so not a huge investment, but we definitely didn’t get 10,000 hours out of them.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38553 posts
Posted on 11/15/23 at 11:43 pm to
Four pages talking about light bulbs. The average age of the OT is now closer to Edison than Justin Bieber.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17052 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 12:47 am to
The LED emitters themselves can last decades. As others said, the problem is the driver circuit boards go out. Buying name brands can alleviate it to some degree, but they still won't live up to their rated life.

The culprit is heat. All the heat generated makes the solder on the board come loose over time. It's especially bad if you put the bulb in a completely closed fixture with no air flow.

Your best bet is to buy a light fixture with built in LEDs. They last longer because they have heat sinks built in and the fixture has much more surface areas to dissipate the heat.
Posted by Pepperoni
Mar-a-Lago
Member since Aug 2013
3486 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 2:55 am to
It’s that quality riposte that only Chicken’s premium subscribers can access.
That’s why I’m here.
Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
80923 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 3:56 am to
They do last longer but is it worth the price difference?
Posted by Pu2kph0
Member since Oct 2022
1111 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 4:49 am to
quote:

They put cheap, shite drivers in them that can’t handle the heat over time. I’m going back to compact fluorescent as I change the dead LEDs.


I went total CFL and was not satisfied. They didn’t last and took too long to “warm up”. If you get a quality LED they tend to last longer. Went total LED from incandescent about 2 years ago. I have yet to have one go out.
Posted by 87PurpleandGold
Arkansas
Member since Sep 2016
498 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 5:04 am to
Dem low watt LEDs prevented 0.00000000000000000001 CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents) Baw! Better for you to be walking in the dark stubbing your toe than all of us drowning in rising ocean levels.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
17849 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 5:15 am to
I still have a huge box of pre-Obama bulbs. Bought a few hundred dollars worth before he banned them.

Posted by GusMcRae
Deep in the heart...
Member since Oct 2008
3239 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Yeah. I installed a lot of LEDs in my house in 2014. Almost all of them are still going strong. You may have bought cheap ones. You have to make sure you buy good ones.


But, why? The light they emit sucks. Creates a miserable ambiance.
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21340 posts
Posted on 11/16/23 at 6:35 am to
My dishwasher and dryer are basically new and don’t work unless you turn them up to 100%. Takes 4 freaking hours to wash dishes and 2-3 cycles to dry clothes.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram